A Theoretical Process Model for Smartphones

  • Frances Chevonne Dancer
  • David A. Dampier
  • Jacqueline M. Jackson
  • Natarajan Meghanathan
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 178)


Smartphones are increasing in popularity due to functionality, portability, convenience and affordability. Because of this, examiners must acquire and analyze these devices when criminal activity is suspected to have occurred. In order to obtain this information, it has to be extracted in a way that is repeatable and testable. There are several process models available for guidance, but the ad-hoc approach is a popular alternative. The dilemma is that ad-hoc approaches and the forensic investigative process models available are not well suited for the examination of such devices. These approaches may cause the validity of investigator skill and methods to fall under scrutiny. To address this, there is a need for an investigative framework tailored to the unique qualities of smartphones. A group of forensic researchers, examiners, and students were surveyed in order to gauge whether this audience feels that this type of process model is needed and the results are presented.


Digital forensics Small Scale Digital Device Smartphone & Process model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baryamureeba, V., Tushabe, F.: The Enhanced Digital Investigation Process Model. In: Digital Forensics Research Workshop (August 2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beebe, N.L., Clark, J.G.: A Hierarchical, Objectives-Based Framework for the DigitalInvestigations Process. Digital Investigation 2(2), 146–166 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carrier, B.D., Spafford, E.H.: An Event-Based Digital Forensic Investigation-Framework. In: Book An Event-Based Digital Forensic Investigation Framework. An Event-Based Digital Forensic Investigation Framework (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choney, S.: 2009: Cell phone sales will be down but not out (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5. (Current February 27, 2011)
  6. 6.
    Ciardhuain, S.O.: An Extended Model of Cybercrime Investigations. International Journal of Digital Evidence 3(1), 1–22 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dancer, F.C., Dampier, D.A.: A Platform Independent Process Model for Smart-phones Based on Invariants. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Fifth IEEE International-Workshop on Systematic Approaches To Digital Forensic Engineering,SADFE, pp. 56–60. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harrill, D.C., Mislan, R.P.: A Small Scale Digital Device Forensics ontology. Small Scale Digital Forensics Journal 1(1), 1–6 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palmer, G.: A Road Map for Digital Forensic Research. In: First Digital Forensics Research Workshop, DFWRS (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ramabhadran, Forensic Investigation Process Model for Windows Mobile Devices, (Current September 15, 2010)
  11. 11.
    Reith, Carr, C., Gunsch, G.: An Examination of Digital Forensic Models. International Journal of Digital Evidence 1(3), 1–12 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frances Chevonne Dancer
    • 1
  • David A. Dampier
    • 1
  • Jacqueline M. Jackson
    • 2
  • Natarajan Meghanathan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringMississippi State UniversityStarkvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceJackson State UniversityJacksonUSA

Personalised recommendations