Advertisement

Mass Diagnosis in Mammography with Mutual Information Based Feature Selection and Support Vector Machine

  • Xiaoming Liu
  • Bo Li
  • Jun Liu
  • Xin Xu
  • Zhilin Feng
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7390)

Abstract

Mass classification is an important problem in breast cancer diagnosis. In this paper, we investigated the classification of masses with feature selection. Based on the initial contour guided by radiologist, level set algorithm is used to deform the contour and achieves the final segmentation. Morphological features are extracted from the boundary of segmented regions. Then, important features are extracted based on mutual information criterion. Linear discriminant analysis and support vector machine are investigated for the final classification. Mammography images from DDSM were used for experiment. The method achieved an accuracy of 86.6% with mutual information based feature selection and SVM classifier. The experimental result shows that mutual information based feature selection is useful for the diagnosis of masses.

Keywords

Mass diagnosis Mammography Mutual information feature selection Support vector machine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tang, J., et al.: Computer-aided Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer with Mammography: Recent advances. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 13(2), 236–251 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, X.M., Tang, J.S., Zhang, X.: A Multiscale Image Enhancement Method for Calcification Detection in Screening Mammograms. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jemal, A., et al.: Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2001, with a Special Feature Regarding Survival. Cancer 101(1), 3–27 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan, H., et al.: Improvement of Radiologists’ Characterization of Mammographic Masses by Using Computer-aided Diagnosis: An ROC Study. Radiology 212(3), 817–827 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pohlman, S., Powell, K.A., Obuchowski, N.A., Chilcote, W.A., Grundfest-Broniatowski, S.: Quantitative Classification of Breast Tumors in Digitized Mammograms. Medical Physics 23, 1337–1345 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rangayyan, R., Mudigonda, N., Desautels, J.: Boundary Modelling and Shape Analysis Methods for Classification of Mammographic Masses. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 38(5), 487–496 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rojas Dominguez, A., Nandi, A.: Toward Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on Automated Segmentation of Masses in Mammograms. Pattern Recognition 42(6), 1138–1148 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu, X.M., et al.: A Benign and Malignant Mass Classification Algorithm Based on an Improved Level Set Segmentation and Texture Feature Analysis. In: 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, iCBBE (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tang, J.S., Liu, X.M.: Classification of Breast Mass in Mammography with an Improved Level Set Segmentation by Combining Morphological Features and Texture Features. In: El-Baz, A., Acharya U, R., Laine, A., Suri, J. (eds.) Multi Modality State-of-the-Art Medical Image Segmentation and Registration Methodologies, vol. II. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peng, H., Long, F., Ding, C.: Feature Selection Based on Mutual Information Criteria of Max-dependency, Max-relevance, and Min-redundancy. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27, 1226–1238 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shi, J., et al.: Characterization of Mammographic Masses Based on Level Set Segmentation with New Image Features and Patient Information. Medical Physics 35, 280 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cristianini, N., Shawe-Taylor, J.: An Introduction to Support Vector Machines: and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods. Cambridge Univ Pr. (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chan, T., Vese, L.: Active Contours without Edges. IEEE Transactions on Image Processin 10(2), 266–277 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chunming, L., et al.: Minimization of Region-Scalable Fitting Energy for Image Segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 17(10), 1940–1949 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liang, S., Rangayyan, R.M., Leo, D.J.E.: Application of Shape Analysis to Mammographic Calcifications. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 13(2), 263–274 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kilday, J., Palmieri, F., Fox, M.: Classifying Mammographic Lesions Using Computerized Image Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 12(4), 664–669 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chang, C., Lin, C.: LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoming Liu
    • 1
  • Bo Li
    • 1
  • Jun Liu
    • 1
  • Xin Xu
    • 1
  • Zhilin Feng
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Computer Science and TechnologyWuhan University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.Zhijiang CollegeZhejiang University of TechnologyHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations