Skip to main content

Semi-supervised Clustering: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (MLDM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7376))

Abstract

The exploration of domain knowledge to improve the mining process begins to give its first results. For example, the use of domain-driven constraints allows the focusing of the discovery process on more useful patterns, from the user’s point of view. Semi-supervised clustering is a technique that partitions unlabeled data by making use of domain knowledge, usually expressed as pairwise constraints among instances or just as an additional set of labeled instances. This work aims for studying the efficacy of semi-supervised clustering, on the problem of determining if some movie will achieve or not an award, just based on the movies characteristics and on ratings given by spectators. Experimental results show that, in general, semi-supervised clustering achieves better accuracy than unsupervised methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basu, S., Banerjee, A., Mooney, R.: Semi–supervised clustering by seeding. In: Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basu, S., Banerjee, A., Mooney, R.J.: Active semi-supervision for pairwise constrained clustering. In: Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), pp. 333–344 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Basu, S., Davidson, I., Wagstaff, K. (eds.): Constrained Clustering: Advances in Algorithms, Theory, and Applications. Chapman and Hall/CRC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bilenko, M., Basu, S., Mooney, R.J.: Integrating constraints and metric learning in semi-supervised clustering. In: Proceedings of 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 39(1), 1–38 (1977)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Klein, D., Kamvar, S.D., Manning, C.D.: From instance-level constraints to space-level constraints: Making the most of prior knowledge in data clustering. In: Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 307–314 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. MacQueen, J.B.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 1, pp. 281–297 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schütze, H.: Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rand, W.M.: Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 66(336), 846–850 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scholz, M.: Sampling-based sequential subgroup mining. In: Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 265–274 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shental, N., Bar-Hillel, A., Hertz, T., Weinshall, D.: Computing gaussian mixture models with em using equivalence constraints. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 16 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wagstaff, K., Basu, S., Davidson, I.: When is constrained clustering beneficial, and why. In: AAAI (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wagstaff, K., Cardie, C., Rogers, S., Schrödl, S.: Constrained k-means clustering with background knowledge. In: Proceedings of 18th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 577–584 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wiederhold, G.: Movies database documentation (1989)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silva, A., Antunes, C. (2012). Semi-supervised Clustering: A Case Study. In: Perner, P. (eds) Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. MLDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7376. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31536-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31537-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics