Advertisement

How Long Is a Short Sentence? – A Linguistic Approach to Definition and Validation of Rules for Easy-to-Read Material

  • Annika Nietzio
  • Birgit Scheer
  • Christian Bühler
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7383)

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to empirical validation and verification of guidelines for easy-to-read material. The goal of our approach is twofold. One the one hand, the linguistic analysis investigates if the well-known rules are really applied consistently throughout the published easy-to-read material. The findings from this study can help define new rules and refine existing rules.

One the other hand, we show how the software developed for the linguistic analysis can also be used as a tool to support authors in the production of easy-to-read material. The tool applies the rules to the new text and highlights any passages that do not meet those rules, so that the author can go back and improve the text.

Keywords

Relative Clause Learning Disability Sentence Length Linguistic Analysis Short Sentence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Capito: Barrierefreie Information - Qualittsstandard (2012), http://www.capito.eu/ (retrieved January 27, 2012)
  2. 2.
    Di-Ji Project: Begründung zur BITV 2.0 Anlage 2, Teil 2 – Leichte Sprache (2012), http://www.di-ji.de/r/bitv2a2t2 (retrieved April 19, 2012)
  3. 3.
    Di-Ji Project: Leitfaden zur erstellung von online-informationen in leichter sprache (2012), http://www.di-ji.de/r/rls (retrieved April 19, 2012)
  4. 4.
    German Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs: Verordnung zur Schaffung barrierefreier Informationstechnik nach dem Behindertengleichstellungsgesetz, BITV (2011), http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bitv_2_0/index.html (retrieved February 01, 2012)
  5. 5.
    Inclusion Europe: Information for all - European standards for making information easy to read and understand. (Available in English, German, and several other languages) (2009), http://www.inclusion-europe.org/LLL/documents/ (retrieved January 31, 2012)
  6. 6.
    LanguageTool: Style and Grammar Checker (2012), http://www.languagetool.org/ (retrieved February 01, 2012)
  7. 7.
    Naber, D.: A Rule-Based Style and Grammar Checker. Master’s thesis, Universität Bielefeld (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    O’Brien, S.: Controlling Controlled English - An Analysis of Several Controlled Language Rule Sets. In: Proceedings of EAMT-CLAW (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C): Web Accessibility Initiative Research and Development Working Group, RDWG (2012), http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/ (retrieved January 27, 2012)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annika Nietzio
    • 1
  • Birgit Scheer
    • 1
  • Christian Bühler
    • 1
  1. 1.Forschungsinstitut Technologie und Behinderung (FTB)der Evangelischen Stiftung VolmarsteinWetter (Ruhr)Germany

Personalised recommendations