Advertisement

Communication Access for a Student with Multiple Disabilities: An Interdisciplinary Collaborative Approach

  • Frances Layman
  • Cathryn Crowle
  • John Ravenscroft
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7383)

Abstract

This case study highlights the challenges and outcomes of implementing assistive technology for a 17 year old school student with a profound hearing loss, and significant physical disabilities. It demonstrates the importance of a collaborative team approach and the benefits for the student of using assistive technology with regards to the development of self determination and social relationships. This article is of benefit for inter-professional teams working in special education, particularly with students with multiple disabilities.

Keywords

Accessibility Assistive Technology Augmented and Alternative Communication (AAC) Design for All and User Involvement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Angelo, D.H.: Impact of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Devices on Families. Aug. and Alter. Comm. 16, 37–47 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ball, L.J., Beukelman, D.R., Pattee, G.L.: Acceptance of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Technology by Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Aug. and Al-ter. Comm. 20(2), 113–122 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bausch, M.E., Ault, M.J., Evmenova, A.S., Behrmann, M.M.: Going Beyond AT Devices: Are AT Services Being Considered? J. Spec. Ed. Tech. 23(2), 1–16 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bottcher, L.: Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy, Their Cognitive Functioning, and Social Participation: A review. Child Neuropsych. 16, 209–228 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooper, L., Balandin, S., Trembath, D.: The Loneliness Ex-periences of Young Adults With Cerebral Palsy Who Use Al-ternative and Augmentative Communication. Aug. and Alter. Comm. 25(3), 154–164 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Copley, J., Ziviani, J.: Barriers to the Use of Assistive Tech-nology for Children With Multiple Disabilities. Occ. Therapy Intern. 11(4), 229–243 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Copley, J., Ziviani, J.: Use of a Team-Based Approach to As-sistive Technology Assessment and Planning for Children With Multiple Disabilities: A Pilot Study. Ass. Tech. 19, 109–125 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dell, A.G., Newton, D.A., Petroff, J.G.: Assistive Technol-ogy in the Classroom. Pearson Education, New Jersey (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Derer, K., Polsgrove, L., Reith, H.: A Survey of Assistive Technology Applications in Schools and Recommendations for Practice. J. Spec. Ed. Tech. XIII(2), 62–80 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Enders, A., Hall, H. (eds.): Assistive Technology Source-book. RESNA Press, Washington (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gilbert, J., Bainbridge, L.: Canada- Interprofessional Educa-tion and Collaboration: Theoretical Challenges, Practical So-lutions. In: Leathard, A. (ed.) Interprofessional Collaboration: From Policy to Practice in Health and Social Care, pp. 280–296. Brunner-Routledge, Hove (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hemsley, B., Balandin, S.: Working With People Who Have Cerebral Palsy: A Speech Pathology Perspective. Acquiring Knowl. in Speech, Lang. and Hearing 5(1), 25–27 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koritsas, S., Iacono, T.: Limitations in Life Participation and Independence Due to Secondary Conditions. Am. Assoc. on Intell. and Dev. Dis. 114(6), 437–448 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lloyd, G., Stead, J., Kendrick, A.: Inter-agency Working to Prevent School Exclusion, http://www.jrf.org.uk/publications/inter-agency-working-prevent-school-exclusion2
  15. 15.
    Orelove, F.P., Sobsey, D.: Educating Children with Multiple Disabilities: A Transdisciplinary Approach. P.H. Brookes Publishing Co., Baltimore (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palisano, R., Rosenbaum, P., Walter, S., Russell, D., Wood, E., Galuppi, B.: Development and Reliability of a System to Classify Gross Motor Function in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Dev. Med. & Child Neuro. 89, 214–223 (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parette, H.P., Brotherson, M.J.: Family-Centred and Cultur-ally Responsive Assistive Technology Decision Making. Inf. and Young Children. 17(4), 355–367 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reed, B.G., Kanny, E.M.: The Use of Computers in School System Practice by Occupational Therapists. Phys. and Occup. Therapy in Ped. 13(4), 37–55 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swinth, Y., Case-Smith, J.: Assistive Technology in Early In-tervention: Theory and Practice. In: Case-Smith, J. (ed.) Occupational Therapy and Early Intervention, pp. 342–368. But-terworth Heinemann, Boston (1993)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Todis, B., Walker, H.M.: User Perspectives on Assistive Technology in Educational Settings. Focus on Except. Children 26(3), 1–16 (1993)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    World Health Organization: Towards a Common Language for Functioning, Disability and Health, ICF (The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health), http://www.who.int/classification/icf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frances Layman
    • 1
  • Cathryn Crowle
    • 2
  • John Ravenscroft
    • 3
  1. 1.Cerebral Palsy AllianceAustralia
  2. 2.Children’s HospitalWestmeadAustralia
  3. 3.Moray House School of EducationThe University of EdinburghUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations