Wearable Range-Vibrotactile Field: Design and Evaluation

  • Frank G. Palmer
  • Zhigang Zhu
  • Tony Ro
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7383)

Abstract

Touch is one of the most natural methods of navigation available to the blind. In this paper, we propose a method to enhance a person’s use of touch by placing range sensors coupled with vibrators throughout their body. This would allow them to be able to feel objects and obstacles in close proximity to them, without having to physically touch them. In order to make effective use of this vibrotactile approach, it is necessary to discern the perceptual abilities of a person wearing small vibrators on different parts of their body. To do this, we designed a shirt with small vibrators placed on the wrists, elbows, and shoulders, and ran an efficient staircase PEST algorithm to determine their sensitivities on those parts of their body.

Keywords

Spatial Navigation Vibrotactile Threshold Alternative Perception Vibrotactile Feedback Pulse Width Modulation Signal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization, Visual impairment and blindness, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs282/en/
  2. 2.
    Second Sight, http://www.2-sight.com
  3. 3.
    Wicab, Inc., Brainport Vision Technology, http://vision.wicab.com/technology/
  4. 4.
    Gonzalez-Mora, J.L., et al.: Seeing the world by hearing: Virtual Acoustic Space (VAS) a new space perception system for blind people. In: Information and Communication Technologies, pp. 837–842 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cardin, S., Thalmann, D., Vexo, F.: A wearable system for mobility improvement of visually impaired people. Vis. Comput. 23(2), 109–118 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lieberman, H.R., Pentland, A.P.: Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: the best PEST. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation 14(1), 21–25 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Torres-Gil, M.A., Casanova-Gonzalez, O., González-Mora, J.L.: Applications of virtual reality for visually impaired people. WSEAS Transactions on Computers 9(2), 184–193 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindeman, R.W., Yanagida, Y., Noma, H., Hosaka, K.: Wearable vibrotactile systems for virtual contact and information display. Virtual Reality, 203–213 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sch, S. & Hulin, T.: Evaluation of vibrotactile feedback to the human arm. Configurations 3–6 (2006), http://lsc.univ-evry.fr/~eurohaptics/upload/cd/papers/f78.pdf
  10. 10.
    Lee, B.-C., Chen, S., Sienko, K.H.: A Wearable device for real-Time motion error detection and vibrotactile instructional cuing. IEEE Trans. Neural Systems and Rehab. Eng. 19(4) (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lieberman, J., Breazeal, C.: TIKL: Development of a wearable vibrotactile feedback suit for improved human motor learning. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23, 919–926 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mann, S., et al.: Blind navigation with a wearable range camera and vibrotactile helmet. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Multimedia (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank G. Palmer
    • 1
  • Zhigang Zhu
    • 1
  • Tony Ro
    • 2
  1. 1.City College Visual Computing LaboratoryGrove School of Engineering, City College of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyGrove School of Engineering, City College of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations