Advertisement

FTLBS: Fault Tolerant Load Balancing Scheme in Wireless Sensor Network

  • Srimanta Halder
  • Monomita Mazumdar
  • Prasenjit Chanak
  • Indrajit Banerjee
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 176)

Abstract

In wireless sensor network (WSN) hundreds or thousands of sensor nodes perform their sensing and transmitting tasks independently. Due to adverse environment, the probability of fault occurrence is very high in wireless sensor network. Higher frequency of fault occurrence decreases the performance as well as lifetime of WSN. The ability of fault tolerance is a primary metric of good wireless sensor network. Energy is an imperative issue in WSN. The sensor nodes include very small battery power and once the nodes are deployed they cannot be recharged or replaced. In this paper, we propose a fault tolerant load balancing scheme (FTLBS) to increase fault tolerability and lifetime of sensor network. The proposed scheme organizes the entire sensor network into groups and levels. In this technique we propose multipath data transmission technique for fault tolerance and the transmission load is balanced by varying group size. It dynamically selects a route based on fitness of the nodes. This approach delivers data efficiently with minimum delay even in faulty network. The simulation results establish that our proposed work gives better performance compared to existing fault tolerant methods.

Keywords

Wireless sensor network (WSN) load fault tolerance base station (BS) group group head 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Banerjee, I., Chanak, P., Sikdar, B.K., Rahaman, H.: EER: Energy Efficient Routing In Wireless Sensor Network. In: IEEE International Technology Symposium 2011, IIT kharagpur, India, January 14-16 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gao, B., Xiong, S., Xu, Z.: The Application of Wireless Sensor Networks in Machinery Fault DiagnosisGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci, E.: A Survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 40(8), 102–114 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Intanagonwiwat, C., Govindan, R., Estrin, D.: Directed diffusion: A Scalable and Robust Communication Paradigm for sensor Networks. In: ACM Intl., Conf. on Mobile Computing and Networking, pp. 56–67 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, S., Foneseca, R., Culler, D.: Reliable Transfer on Wireless Sensor Networks. In: The First IEEE International Conference on Sensor and Ad hoc Communication and Networks, pp. 449–459 (October 2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heinzelman, W.R., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy-Efficient Communication Protocol for Wireless Micro sensor. In: IEEE Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Younis, O., Fahmy, S.: HEED: A Hybrid, Energy-Efficient, Distributed Clustering Approach for Ad Hoc Sensor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 3(4), 366–379 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aslam, N., Phillips, W., Robertson, W.: A Unified Clustering and Communication Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. IAENG International Journal of Computer Science 35(3), 249–258 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loscri, V., Morabito, G., Marano, S.: A two-levels hierarchy for low-energy adaptive clustering hierarchy (TL-LEACH). In: Vehicular Technology Conference, pp. 1809–1813 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Banerjee, I., Chanak, P., Rahaman, H., Das, N.: GBFTS: Group Based Fault Tolerant Scheme in Wireless Sensor Networks. International Journal of Information and Electronics Engineering 2(2), 179–184 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heinzeman, W.R., Chandrakasn, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Procl. of IICSS (January 2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vu, H., Nguyen, T., Mittal, N., Venkatesan, S.: PEQ: A Privacy-Preserving Scheme for Exact Query Evaluation in Distributed Sensor Data Networks. In: 28th IEEE International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, SRDS 2009, pp. 189–198 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boukerche, A., Nelem Pazzi, R.W., Araujo, R.B.: Fault-tolerant wireless sensor network routing protocols for the supervision of context-aware physical environments. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clark, D., Tennehouse, D.: Architectural Consideration for a New Generation of Protocols. In: Proc ACM SiGCOMM (September 1990)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kulik, J., Heinzelman, W.R., Balakrishnan, H.: Negotiation-based protocols for disseminating information in wireless sensor networks. Wireless Netwroks 8, 169–185 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Banerjee, I., Rahaman, H., Sikder, B.: UDDN: Unidirectional Data Dissemination via Negotiation. In: International Conference on Information Networking, Pusan Korea, January 23-25 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Banerjee, I., Chanak, P., Sikdar, B.K., Rahaman, H.: EERIH: Energy Efficient Routing via Information Highway in Sensor Network. In: IEEE International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical and Computer Technology, Kanyakumari, India, March 23-24 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Srimanta Halder
    • 1
  • Monomita Mazumdar
    • 1
  • Prasenjit Chanak
    • 1
  • Indrajit Banerjee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyBengal Engineering and Science UniversityShibpurIndia

Personalised recommendations