Advertisement

Focus, Uniqueness and Soft Presupposition Triggers

  • Andreas Walker
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7218)

Abstract

Von Heusinger (2007) shows that the definite article’s uniqueness presupposition causes problems in a standard account of focus alternatives. He solves this problem by proposing a new lexical entry for the definite article, a solution adopted by Riester and Kamp (2010). This paper shows that the observed behavior is not limited to the definite article, making such a solution undesirable. Our argument is based on two observations: (1) The definite article is a soft presupposition trigger with respect to uniqueness and (2) soft presupposition triggers have a special behavior in focus alternatives.

Keywords

Standard Account Lexical Entry Definite Article Correct Reading Alternative Semantic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, B.: Where Have Some of the Presuppositions Gone? In: Birner, B., Ward, G. (eds.) Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning. Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn. Benjamins, Philadelphia (2006)Google Scholar
  2. Abrusán, M.: Triggering Verbal Presuppositions. In: Li, N., Lutz, D. (eds.) Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20. Vancouver (2011)Google Scholar
  3. Abusch, D.: Lexical Alternatives as a Source of Pragmatic Presuppositions. In: Jackson, B. (ed.) SALT XII. CLC, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  4. Riester, A., Kamp, H.: Squiggly Issues: Alternative Sets, Complex DPs, and Intensionality. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds.) Logic, Language and Meaning. LNCS, vol. 6042, pp. 374–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Romoli, J.: The Presuppositions of Soft Triggers Are Not Presuppositions. In: Ashton, N., Chereches, A., Lutz, D. (eds.) Proceedings of SALT 21. Rutgers University (2011)Google Scholar
  6. Rooth, M.: A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Simons, M.: On the Conversational Basis of Some Presuppositions. In: Hastings, R., Jackson, B., Zvolensky, Z. (eds.) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory, vol. 11. CLC, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  8. Von Heusinger, K.: Alternative Semantics for Definite NPs. In: Schwabe, K., Winkler, S. (eds.) On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Generalizations Across Languages. Benjamins, Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations