Each vs. Jeweils: A Cover-Based View on Distance Distributivity

  • Lucas Champollion
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7218)

Abstract

Zimmermann [2002] identifies two kinds of distance-distributive items across languages. The first kind (e.g. each) is restricted to distribution over individuals; the second kind (e.g. German jeweils) can also be interpreted as distributing over salient occasions. I explain this behavior by formally relating this split to the two distributivity operators proposed in the work of Link (atomic operator) and Schwarzschild (cover-based operator), which I reformulate in a Neo-Davidsonian framework.

Keywords

distributivity crosslinguistic semantics algebraic semantics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balusu, R.: Distributive reduplication in Telugu. In: Davis, C., Deal, A.R., Zabbal, Y. (eds.) NELS 36, pp. 39–52. GLSA, Amherst (2005)Google Scholar
  2. Champollion, L.: Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (2010)Google Scholar
  3. Deo, A., Piñango, M.M.: Quantification and context in measure adverbs. In: Ashton, N., Chereches, A., Lutz, D. (eds.) SALT 21, pp. 295–312 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. Dotlačil, J.: Fastidious distributivity. In: Ashton, N., Chereches, A., Lutz, D. (eds.) SALT 21, pp. 313–332 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Dotlačil, J.: Binominal each as an anaphoric determiner: Compositional analysis. In: Aguilar, A., Chernilovskaya, A., Nouwen, R. (eds.) Sinn und Bedeutung 16, MITWPL (to appear, 2012)Google Scholar
  6. Farkas, D.: Dependent indefinites. In: Corblin, F., Godard, D., Marandin, J.-M. (eds.) Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics, pp. 243–268 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. Gil, D.: Distributive numerals. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles (1982)Google Scholar
  8. Krifka, M.: Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In: Bartsch, R., van Benthem, J., van Emde Boas, P. (eds.) Semantics and Contextual Expression, pp. 75–115. Foris, Dordrecht (1989)Google Scholar
  9. Landman, F.: Events and plurality: The Jerusalem lectures. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
  10. Lasersohn, P.: Generalized distributivity operators. Linguistics and Philosophy 21(1), 83–93 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Link, G.: The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In: Link (1998), pp. 11–34 (1983)Google Scholar
  12. Link, G.: Je drei Äpfel - three apples each: Quantification and the German ’je’. In: Link (1998), pp. 117–132 (1986)Google Scholar
  13. Link, G.: Generalized quantifiers and plurals. In: Link (1998), pp. 89–116 (1987)Google Scholar
  14. Link, G.: Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy. CSLI (1998)Google Scholar
  15. Moltmann, F.: Measure adverbials. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 629–660 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moltmann, F.: Parts and wholes in semantics. Oxford University Press (1997)Google Scholar
  17. Oh, S.-R.: Distributivity in an event semantics. In: Hastings, R., Jackson, B., Zvolensky, Z. (eds.) SALT 11, pp. 326–345. CLC Publications, Ithaca (2001)Google Scholar
  18. Schwarzschild, R.: Pluralities. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996)Google Scholar
  19. Szabolcsi, A.: Quantification. Research Surveys in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press (2010)Google Scholar
  20. Zimmermann, M.: Boys buying two sausages each: On the syntax and semantics of distance-distributivity. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  21. Zucchi, S., White, M.: Twigs, sequences and the temporal constitution of predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 187–222 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas Champollion
    • 1
  1. 1.New York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations