Abstract
We present the Cards corpus of task-oriented dialogues and show how it can inform study of the ways in which discourse is goal- and preference-driven. We report on three experimental studies involving underspecified referential expressions and quantifier domain restriction.
We are indebted to Karl Schultz for designing the game engine underlying the Cards corpus. This research was supported in part by ONR grant No. N00014-10-1-0109 and ARO grant No. W911NF-07-1-0216.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, J.F., Miller, B.W., Ringger, E.K., Sikorski, T.: A robust system for natural spoken dialogue. In: Proceedings of ACL, pp. 62–70 (1996)
Büring, D.: On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(5), 511–545 (2003)
Cooper, R., Larsson, S.: Accommodation and reaccommodation in dialogue. In Göteborg Papers in Computational Linguistics. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University (2001)
Davis, C.: Constraining Interpretation: Sentence Final Particles in Japanese. Ph.D. thesis, UMass Amherst (2011)
Dekker, P.: Optimal inquisitive discourse. In: Aloni, M., Butler, A., Dekker, P. (eds.) Questions in Dynamic Semantics, pp. 83–101. Elsevier (2007)
De Vault, D., Stone, M.: Learning to interpret utterances using dialogue history. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009), pp. 184–192. Association for Computational Linguistics, Athens (2009)
Djalali, A., Clausen, D., Lauer, S., Schultz, K., Potts, C.: Modeling expert effects and common ground using Questions Under Discussion. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Building Representations of Common Ground with Intelligent Agents, AAAI (2011)
Ginzburg, J.: Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In: Seligman, J. (ed.) Language, Logic, and Computation. CSLI (1996)
Ginzburg, J., Fernandez, R.: Computational models of dialogue. In: Clark, A., Fox, C., Lappin, S. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing. Blackwell (2010)
Groenendijk, J.: The logic of interrogation. In: Matthews, T., Strolovitch, D. (eds.) Proceedings of SALT IX, pp. 109–126. Cornell University (1999)
Malamud, S.: Semantics and Pragmatics of Arbitrariness. Ph.D. thesis, Penn. (2006)
Roberts, C.: Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In: Yoon, J.H., Kathol, A. (eds.) OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 91–136. The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics (1996) (revised 1998)
van Rooy, R.: Questioning to resolve decision problems. Journal Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 727–763 (2003)
Schoubye, A.: Descriptions, truth value intuitions, and questions. Journal Linguistics and Philosophy 32(6), 583–617 (2009)
Stoia, L., Shockley, D.M., Byron, D.K., Fosler-Lussier, E.: SCARE: A situated corpus with annotated referring expressions. In: Proceedings of LREC (2008)
Thompson, H.S., Anderson, A., Bard, E.G., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Newlands, A., Sotillo, C.: The HCRC map task corpus: Natural dialogue for speech recognition. In: HLT 1993: Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology, pp. 25–30. ACL (1993)
Toosarvandani, M.: Association with Foci. Ph.D. thesis, UC Berkeley (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Djalali, A., Lauer, S., Potts, C. (2012). Corpus Evidence for Preference-Driven Interpretation. In: Aloni, M., Kimmelman, V., Roelofsen, F., Sassoon, G.W., Schulz, K., Westera, M. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7218. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31481-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31482-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)