Skip to main content

Corpus Evidence for Preference-Driven Interpretation

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language and Meaning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7218))

  • 1692 Accesses

Abstract

We present the Cards corpus of task-oriented dialogues and show how it can inform study of the ways in which discourse is goal- and preference-driven. We report on three experimental studies involving underspecified referential expressions and quantifier domain restriction.

We are indebted to Karl Schultz for designing the game engine underlying the Cards corpus. This research was supported in part by ONR grant No. N00014-10-1-0109 and ARO grant No. W911NF-07-1-0216.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, J.F., Miller, B.W., Ringger, E.K., Sikorski, T.: A robust system for natural spoken dialogue. In: Proceedings of ACL, pp. 62–70 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Büring, D.: On D-trees, beans, and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(5), 511–545 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., Larsson, S.: Accommodation and reaccommodation in dialogue. In Göteborg Papers in Computational Linguistics. Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C.: Constraining Interpretation: Sentence Final Particles in Japanese. Ph.D. thesis, UMass Amherst (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P.: Optimal inquisitive discourse. In: Aloni, M., Butler, A., Dekker, P. (eds.) Questions in Dynamic Semantics, pp. 83–101. Elsevier (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vault, D., Stone, M.: Learning to interpret utterances using dialogue history. In: Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (EACL 2009), pp. 184–192. Association for Computational Linguistics, Athens (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Djalali, A., Clausen, D., Lauer, S., Schultz, K., Potts, C.: Modeling expert effects and common ground using Questions Under Discussion. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Building Representations of Common Ground with Intelligent Agents, AAAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, J.: Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In: Seligman, J. (ed.) Language, Logic, and Computation. CSLI (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginzburg, J., Fernandez, R.: Computational models of dialogue. In: Clark, A., Fox, C., Lappin, S. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing. Blackwell (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, J.: The logic of interrogation. In: Matthews, T., Strolovitch, D. (eds.) Proceedings of SALT IX, pp. 109–126. Cornell University (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, S.: Semantics and Pragmatics of Arbitrariness. Ph.D. thesis, Penn. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C.: Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In: Yoon, J.H., Kathol, A. (eds.) OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 91–136. The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics (1996) (revised 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rooy, R.: Questioning to resolve decision problems. Journal Linguistics and Philosophy 26, 727–763 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoubye, A.: Descriptions, truth value intuitions, and questions. Journal Linguistics and Philosophy 32(6), 583–617 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoia, L., Shockley, D.M., Byron, D.K., Fosler-Lussier, E.: SCARE: A situated corpus with annotated referring expressions. In: Proceedings of LREC (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, H.S., Anderson, A., Bard, E.G., Doherty-Sneddon, G., Newlands, A., Sotillo, C.: The HCRC map task corpus: Natural dialogue for speech recognition. In: HLT 1993: Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology, pp. 25–30. ACL (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Toosarvandani, M.: Association with Foci. Ph.D. thesis, UC Berkeley (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Djalali, A., Lauer, S., Potts, C. (2012). Corpus Evidence for Preference-Driven Interpretation. In: Aloni, M., Kimmelman, V., Roelofsen, F., Sassoon, G.W., Schulz, K., Westera, M. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7218. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31482-7_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31481-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31482-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics