Advertisement

Evaluative Adjectives, Scale Structure, and Ways of Being Polite

  • Lisa Bylinina
  • Stas Zadorozhny
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7218)

Abstract

This study is an attempt to add new facts and conclusions to draw from them to an old topic – semantics of evaluative adjectives (Bierwisch 1989). The evidence we will be using is based on a corpus study. The more general goal of this paper is to develop and describe a pipeline that would help solve quantitative semantic tasks in an easier and more systematic way, this particular study being an example.

Keywords

Scale Structure Positive Form Gradable Adjective Pointwise Mutual Information Corpus Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baroni, M., Bernardini, S.: Bootcat: Bootstrapping corpora and terms from the web. In: Proceedings of LREC 2004, pp. 1313–1316 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. Bartsch, R., Vennemann, T.: Semantic Structures: A Study in the Relation between Syntax and Semantics, Frankfurt (1973)Google Scholar
  3. Bierwisch, M.: The semantics of gradation. In: Bierwisch, M., Lang, E. (eds.) Dimensional Adjectives: Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation, pp. 71–261. Springer, Berlin (1989)Google Scholar
  4. Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  5. Church, K.W., Hanks, P.: Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics 16, 22–29 (1990)Google Scholar
  6. Evert, S.: The statistics of word cooccurrences: word pairs and collocations, PhD thesis. Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Fano, R.: Transmission of Information: A Statistical Theory of Communications. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1961)Google Scholar
  8. Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. Syntax and Semantics 3, 41–58 (1975)Google Scholar
  9. Hollander, M., Wolfe, D.: Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley series in probability and statistics: Texts and references section. Wiley (1999)Google Scholar
  10. Horn, L.: A natural history of negation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1989)Google Scholar
  11. Kennedy, C.: Projecting the adjective: the syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison, PhD thesis, UCSD (1999)Google Scholar
  12. Kennedy, C.: Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 30, 1–45 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kennedy, C., McNally, L.: Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81(2), 345–381 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leech, G.: Principles of pragmatics. Longman, London (1983)Google Scholar
  15. McNally, L.: The Relative Role of Property Type and Scale Structure in Explaining the Behavior of Gradable Adjectives. In: Nouwen, R., van Rooij, R., Sauerland, U., Schmitz, H.-C. (eds.) ViC 2009. LNCS, vol. 6517, pp. 151–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mills, S.: Gender and Politeness. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rotstein, S., Winter, Y.: Total adjectives vs. partial adjectives: Scale structure and higher-order modifiers. Natural Language Semantics 12, 259–288 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sassoon, G.: A slightly modified economy principle: Stable properties have non-stable standards. In: Sinn und Bedeutung 16, Utrecht (2011)Google Scholar
  19. Sassoon, G., Toledo, A.: Absolute vs. relative adjectives: Variance within vs. between individuals. In: Proceedings of SALT21 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. Solt, S.: Comparison to fuzzy standards. In: Sinn und Bedeutung 16, Utrecht (2011)Google Scholar
  21. van Rooij, R.: Being polite is a handicap: Towards a game theoretical analysis of polite linguistic behaviour. In: Tennenholtz, M. (ed.) TARK (9) (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa Bylinina
    • 1
  • Stas Zadorozhny
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Linguistics OTSUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Yandex LLCRussia

Personalised recommendations