Preference for Combining or Separating Events in Human and Avatar Decisions
According to the Renewable Resources Model people have limited emotional resource capacity for making decisions. As a result people have a general preference for spreading outcome events over time (Linville and Fisher (1991). This study examines whether the introduction of avatars will alleviate limited emotional resources and result in increased preference for combining events. This hypothesis was tested using a 2x2 factorial between subjects design which systematically manipulated the decision outcome (gains versus losses) and avatar use (avatar mediated versus non avatar mediated decisions). Preferences for combining or separating positive and negative emotional impactful events were measured using choice problems of Linville and Fischer (1991). Results show a replication of Linville and Fisher (1991) but only in the non avatar condition. In contrast, in the avatar condition a significant increase of preference for combining events was observed as predicted. The results give support for the Renewable Resource Model.
KeywordsAvatar Mediated Communication Limited resource model Elderly Persons Human decision Making Time preference Spreading of outcomes
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Baumeister, R.F., Smeichel, B.J., Vohs, K.D.: Self-regulation and the executive function: The self as controlling agent. In: Kruglanski, A.W., Higgins, E.T. (eds.) Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, 2nd edn. Guilford, New York (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Janis, L., Mann, L.: Decision making. Free Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar