Skip to main content

Just Noticeable Differences of Low-Intensity Vibrotactile Forces at the Fingertip

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7283))

Abstract

The presented study measures JNDs of vibrotactile force amplitudes at nine frequencies in the bandwidth of 5 ... 1000 Hz with 29 subjects taking part in the study. Reference stimuli are placed near the absolute perception threshold of these frequencies, therefore very high discrimination thresholds of 20 dB on average (with a runaway value of 40 dB @ 1000 Hz) are measured. This is in accordance to observations of Weber’s Law for reference stimuli near the perception threshold. Statistical analysis suggests influence of fingertip size on the results, but no influence of fine motor activity (i.e. playing musical instruments, handicraft, computer games) could be asserted with the given dataset. Results can be used to facilitate task-specific design of sensors and actuators in near-threshold contact situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allin, S., Matsuoka, Y., Klatzky, R.: Measuring Just Noticeable Differences For Haptic Force Feedback: Implications for Rehabilitation. In: 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments & Teleoperator Systems (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartoli, C., Beug, M.F., Bruns, T., et al.: Traceable dynamic measurement of mechanical quantities: a new European collaborative project. In: 15th Int. Metrology Cong. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buus, S.: Psychophysical methods and other factors that affect the outcome of psychoacoustic measurements Genetics and the Function of the Auditory System. In: Proceedings of the 19th Danavox Symposium (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cholewiak, S.A., Kim, K., Tan, H.Z., Adelstein, B.D.: A Frequency-Domain Analysis of Haptic Gratings. IEEE Trans. Haptics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Forrest, N., Baillie, S., Kalita, P., Tan, H.Z.: A comparative study of haptic stiffness identification by veterinarians and students. IEEE Trans. Haptics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gescheider, G.A., Wright, J.H., Verillo, R.T.: Information-Processing Channels in the Tactile Sensory System. Psychology Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gescheider, G.A.: Psychophysics - the Fundamentals. Lawrence Erlbaum (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gescheider, G.A., Bolanowski, S.J., Verrillo, R.T., et al.: Vibrotactile intensity discrimination measured by three methods. JASA 87 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hatzfeld, C., Kern, T.A., Werthschützky, R.: Design and Evaluation of a Measuring System for Human Force Perception Parameters. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 162 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hatzfeld, C., Werthschützky, R.: Mechanical Impedance as Coupling Parameter between Force and Deflection Perception: Experimental Evaluation. In: EHC 2012 (accepted paper, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hinterseer, P., Hirche, S., Chaudhuri, et al.: Perception-Based Data Reduction and Transmission of Haptic Data in Telepresence and Teleaction Systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Processing 56 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Leek, M.R.: Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jones, L.A.: Matching forces: constant errors and differential thresholds. Perception 18 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pang, X., Tan, H., Durlach, N.: Manual Resolution of Length, Force and Compliance. In: ASME DSC Advances in Robotics, vol. 42 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pongrac, H.: Vibrotactile perception: examining the coding of vibrations and the just noticeable difference under various conditions. In: Multimedia Systems, vol. 13. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reisinger, J., Wild, J., Mauter, G., Bubb, H.: Haptical feeling of rotary switches. In: EHC 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Peters, R., Hackeman, E., Goldreich, D.: Diminutive Digits Discern Delicate Details: Fingertip Size and the Sex Difference in Tactile Spatial Acuity. Journal of Neuroscience 20 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tan, H.Z., Yang, S., Pizlo, Z., et al.: Manual Detection of Spatial and Temporal Torque Variation through a Rotary Switch. IEEE Trans. Haptics 8 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hatzfeld, C., Werthschützky, R. (2012). Just Noticeable Differences of Low-Intensity Vibrotactile Forces at the Fingertip. In: Isokoski, P., Springare, J. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication. EuroHaptics 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7283. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31404-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31404-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31403-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31404-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics