Skip to main content

Cutaneous Inputs Yield Judgments of Line Length That Are Equal to, or Better Than, Those Based on Kinesthetic Inputs

  • Conference paper
Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication (EuroHaptics 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7283))

Abstract

An experiment was designed to investigate haptic perception of length depending on whether inputs were cutaneous or derived from passively-guided movements. Cutaneous inputs appeared to offer more accurate information than did those from kinesthesis. Our results are inconsistent with the view that, for identification of raised line drawings, kinesthetic inputs are more important than tactile inputs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergmann Tiest, W.M., van der Hoff, L.M., Kappers, A.M.: Cutaneous and kinaesthetic perception of traversed distance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE World Haptics Conference, pp. 593–597 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jansson, G.: Haptic perception of outline 2d shape: The contributions of information via the skin, the joints and the muscles. In: Bril, B., Ledebt, A., Dietrich, G., Roby-Brami, A. (eds.) Advances in Perception - Action Coupling, pp. 25–30. Editions EDK, Paris (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Noll, N.C., Weber, R.J.: Visual and tactile scanning: moving scan versus moving medium. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 23, 473–476 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Magee, L.E., Kennedy, J.M.: Exploring pictures tactually. Nature 283, 287–288 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibson, J.J.: Observations on active touch. Psychological Review 69(6), 477–490 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Srinivasan, M.A., LaMotte, R.H.: Tactual discrimination of softness. Journal of Neurophysiology 73, 88–101 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giachritsis, C., Wright, R., Wing, A.: The Contribution of Proprioceptive and Cutaneous Cues in Weight Perception: Early Evidence for Maximum-Likelihood Integration. In: Kappers, A.M.L., van Erp, J.B.F., Bergmann Tiest, W.M., van der Helm, F.C.T. (eds.) EuroHaptics 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6191, pp. 11–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ernst, M.O., Banks, M.S.: Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415, 429–433 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Symmons, M.A., Richardson, B.L., Wuillemin, D.B.: Components of haptic information: skin rivals kinesthesis. Perception 37, 1596–1604 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Richardson, B.L., Symmons, M.A., Wuillemin, D.B.: The relative importance of cutaneous and kinesthetic cues in raised line drawing exploration. In: Ballesteros, S., Heller, M.A. (eds.) Touch, Blindness, and Neuroscience, pp. 247–250. Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia, Madrid (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aron, A., Gabrieli, J., Hedden, T., Ketay, S., Markus, H.: Cultural influences in neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science 19(1), 12–17 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson, B.L., Symmons, M.A., Accardi, R.: The TDS: a new device for comparing active and passive-guided touch. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8, 414–417 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Loo, C.K., Hall, L.A., McCloskey, D.I., Rowe, M.J.: Proprioceptive contributions to tactile identification of figures: dependence on figure size. Behavioural Brain Research 7(3), 383–386 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Van Doorn, G.H., Richardson, B.L., Symmons, M.A., Howell, J.L. (2012). Cutaneous Inputs Yield Judgments of Line Length That Are Equal to, or Better Than, Those Based on Kinesthetic Inputs. In: Isokoski, P., Springare, J. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication. EuroHaptics 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7283. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31404-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31404-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31403-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31404-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics