Skip to main content

The Precision of “Haptic” Rod Length Perception Is Reduced by Lack of Visual Precision

  • Conference paper
  • 2170 Accesses

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 7283)

Abstract

In studies on haptic rod length perception, participants conventionally report their length estimates by placing a visual landmark at a position equal to the rod’s perceived endpoint. We hypothesized that this visual aspect substantially increases the variability of the recorded length judgments. To examine this, we developed a virtual reality length judgment apparatus that provides better visual information. Participants performed a rod length perception task in both the conventional apparatus and the virtual reality apparatus. The variability of the length judgments was found to be higher in the conventional apparatus. We determined that between half and two-thirds of the variance in the conventional apparatus is haptic variance. Thus, vision accounts for between one-third and half of the variance that was previously thought to be haptic variance. Our finding implies that the virtual reality apparatus may be more suitable for studying subtle effects in haptic rod length perception.

Keywords

  • multi-modal perception
  • dynamic touch
  • sensory integration

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Solomon, H.Y., Turvey, M.T.: Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 14(3), 404–427 (1988)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Kingma, I., van de Langenberg, R., Beek, P.J.: Which mechanical invariants are associated with the perception of length and heaviness of a nonvisible handheld rod? testing the inertia tensor hypothesis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 30(2), 346–354 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Künnapas, T.: Distance perception as a function of available cues. J. Exp. Psychol. 77(4), 523–529 (1968)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradshaw, M.F., Rogers, B.J.: The interaction of binocular disparity and Motion Parallax in the computation of depth. Vision Res. 36(21), 3457–3468 (1996)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Smeets, J.B.J., van den Dobbelsteen, J.J., de Grave, D.D.J., van Beers, R.J., Brenner, E.: Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103(49), 18781–18786 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Debats, N.B., van de Langenberg, R.W., Kingma, I., Smeets, J.B.J., Beek, P.J.: Exploratory Movements Determine Cue Weighting in Haptic Length Perception of Handheld Rods. J. Neurophysiol. 104, 2821–2830 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Menger, R., Withagen, R.: How mechanical context and feedback jointly determine the use of mechanical variables in length perception by dynamic touch. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71(8), 1862–1875 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Chan, T.-C.: The situational effects on haptic perception of rod length. Percept. Psychophys. 58(7), 1110–1123 (1996)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Debats, N.B., Kingma, I., Beek, P.J., Smeets, J.B.J. (2012). The Precision of “Haptic” Rod Length Perception Is Reduced by Lack of Visual Precision. In: Isokoski, P., Springare, J. (eds) Haptics: Perception, Devices, Mobility, and Communication. EuroHaptics 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7283. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31404-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31404-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31403-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31404-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)