Dissociation of Vibrotactile Frequency Discrimination Performances for Supra-Threshold and Near-Threshold Vibrations

  • Scinob Kuroki
  • Junji Watanabe
  • Shin’ya Nishida
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7283)


For the wide range of vibration frequencies, the human capacity for vibrotactile frequency discrimination has been reported constant. However, vibrotactile detection depend on two different receptors, one is Meissner corpuscle for low frequencies and the other is Pacinian corpuscle for high frequencies. To examine the impact of input pathway on frequency discrimination task, discrimination capacity has been compared directly by using supra-threshold and near-threshold stimuli since near-threshold stimuli mainly activate one input pathway. Each standard frequencies 15, 30, 60, 120, 240 and 480 Hz at amplitude 6dB and 16 dB detection threshold, was paired with a series of comparison frequencies, and discrimination capacity was quantified by the discriminable frequency increment (Δf) and the Weber Fraction (Δf/f). The result revealed constant and good discrimination capacities for strong stimulus conditions but discrete and bad capacities for weak stimulus conditions. Near-threshold stimuli produced a marked impairment in vibrotactile discrimination at the high standard frequencies around 240 Hz, probably detected by Pacinian corpuscle, but relatively little effect at lower frequencies, mainly detected by Meissner corpuscle.


Comparison Stimulus Standard Frequency Weber Fraction Frequency Discrimination Pacinian Corpuscle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gescheider, A., Bolanowski, S.J., Hardick, K.R.: The frequency selectivity of information-processing channels in the tactile sensory system. Somatosens Mot. Res. 18(3), 191–201 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Talbot, W., Darian-Smith, I., Kornhuber, H., Mountcastle, V.B.: The sense of flutter-vibration: Comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand1. J. Neurophys. 31(2), 301–334 (1968)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goff, G.: Differential discrimination of frequency of cutaneous mechanical vibration. J. Exp. Psychol. 74, 294–299 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahns, D., Perkins, N., Sahai, V., Robinson, L., Rowe, M.: Vibrotactile frequency discrimination in human hairy skin. J. Neurophys. 95(3), 1442–1450 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    LaMotte, R., Mountcastle, V.: Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychological measurements. J. Neurophys. 38(3), 539–559 (1975)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mountcastle, V., Talbot, W., Sakata, H., Hyvarinen, J.: Cortical neuronal mechanisms in flutter-vibration studied in unanesthetized monkeys: Neuronal periodicity and frequency discrimination. Journal of Neurophysiology 32(3), 452–484 (1969)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scinob Kuroki
    • 1
  • Junji Watanabe
    • 1
  • Shin’ya Nishida
    • 1
  1. 1.NTT Communication Science LaboratoriesJapan

Personalised recommendations