Abstract
Usability has become a competitive factor in the software industry. Specifically, the software industry in the United States has recognized this important factor and successfully leverages it for achieving competitive advantage. Compared to this fast development in the US, it seems questionable whether this view is also widespread among small and medium sized software producing and client companies in Germany and whether they direct sufficient attention to usability. This article presents the results of an empirical study exploring the status quo of the importance, the knowledge and the actual use of usability concepts among small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in Germany. Following an organizational field perspective, we investigate how interactions between actors in the software field influence the usability awareness as well as the knowledge and actual use of usability concepts. Based on the results of our study, we provide recommendations on how to increase awareness and maturity of software usability in SMEs in Germany.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Backhaus, K., Plinke, W., Erichson, B., & Weiber, R. (2008). Multivariate Analysemethoden (12 Ausg.). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Bär, N., & Reich, D. (2011). Was Firmen wollen: eine Umfrage zu Usability Dienstleistungen für klein- und mittelständische Unternehmen. S. 250ff.: Jahresband Usability Professionals.
Burns, L. R., & Wholey, D. R. (1993). Adaption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 105–138.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.
Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travel of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sévon (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). Berlin: deGruyter.
David, R. J., & Strang, D. (2006). When fashion is fleeting: Transitory collective beliefs and the dynamics of TQM consulting. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 215–233.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Guler, I., Guillén, M. F., & Macpherson, J. M. (2002). Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 207–232.
Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 593–627.
Hirsch, P. (1972). Processing fads and fashions: An organization-set analysis of cultural industy systems. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 639–659.
Homburg, C., & Krohmer, H. (2005). Marketing management. Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Human Factors International (2011). Certification. Abgerufen am 14. Februar 2011 von http://www.humanfactors.com/certification/default.asp
Kieser, A., & Ernst, B. (2002). In search of explanations for the consulting explosion. In K. Sahlin-Andresson & L. Engwall (Eds.), The expansion of management knowledge: Carriers, flows, and sources (pp. 47–73). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Markowski, N., Grosser, K., & Kuhl, R. (2008). Analyse von Barrieren und Hemmnissen beim Wissenstransfer zwischen Hochschulen und KMU. Düsseldorf: Forschungsberichte des Fachbereichs Wirtschaft der Fachhochschule Düsseldorf.
Palmer, D. A., Jennings, P. D., & Zhou, X. (1993). Late adoption of the multidivisional form by large U.S. corporations: Institutional, political, and economic accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 100–131.
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 116–145.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Stratman, J. K., & Roth, A. V. (2007). Enterprise resource planning (ERP) competence constructs: Two-stage multi-item scale development and validation. Decision Sciences, 33(4), 601–628.
Swan, J. A., & Newell, S. (1995). The role of professional associations in technology diffusion. Organization Studies, 16(5), 847–874.
Usability in Germany (2011). Abschlussbericht zum Projekt “Gebrauchstauglichkeit von Anwendungssoftware als Wettbewerbsfaktor für KMU”. www.usability-in-germany.de: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie.
Valente, T. (1993). Diffusion of innovations and policy decision-making. Journal of Communication, 43(1), 30–45. Winter.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 587–613.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scheiber, F. et al. (2012). Software Usability in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Germany: An Empirical Study. In: Maedche, A., Botzenhardt, A., Neer, L. (eds) Software for People. Management for Professionals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31371-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31371-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31370-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31371-4
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)