Skip to main content

DP Test in Geotechnical Characterization of Shallow Landslides Source Area: Results and Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Landslide Science and Practice

Abstract

Aiming at improving the knowledge on the source areas of shallow landslides, this research deals with the geotechnical characterization of the debris slope cover of arenaceous formations, by means of low cost dynamic penetration tests (Dynamic Probing – DP).

The knowledge of strength parameters of this material is fundamental to understand the triggering mechanisms of the shallow landslides. Therefore, in order to determine the typical values of relative density (DR) and internal friction angle (φ′), many tests were performed and the results of 132 Dynamic Probing tests, 74 Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) and 14 laboratory shear tests, were analysed. The comparison between the φ′ values obtained by DP tests with those resulting from direct shear tests evidenced a good linear correlation. This confirmed the satisfactory and repeatable results of DP tests. Therefore, Dynamic Probing can be an effective, simple, practical and inexpensive tool for the geotechnical characterization of hazardous slopes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Campbell RH (1975) Soil slip, debris flows and rainstorms in the Santa Monica mountains and vicinity, southern California. U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 851, 51p

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmignani L, Conti P, Cornamusini G, Meccheri M (2004). The internal northern Apennines, the northern Tyrrhenian Sea and the Sardinia-Corsica Block. In: Crescenti V, D’Offizi S, Merlino S, Sacchi L (eds), Geology of Italy, Soc. Geol It., Spec. Vol. for 32th IGC Florence 2004, pp 59–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmignani L, Lazzarotto A (2004) Geological Map of Tuscany (Italy). Regione Toscana, Spec. Edition for the 32nd IGC, Florence. Tip. L.A.C., Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • Casagli N, Dapporto S, Ibsen ML, Tofani V, Vannocci P (2006) Analysis of the landslide triggering mechanism during the storm of 20th-21st November 2000, in Northern Tuscany. Landslides 3:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascini L (2004) The flowslides of May 1998 in the Campania region, Italy: the scientific emergency management. Rivista Italiana di Geotecnica 2:11–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Conti P, Lazzarotto A (2004) Geology of Tuscany: evolution of the state-of- knowledge presented by geological maps and the new geological map of Tuscany, 1:250,000 scale. In: Morini D, Bruni P (ed) The Regione Toscana project of geological mapping. Spec. Vol. for the 32nd IGC, Florence, pp 25–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosta G, Guzzetti F, Marchetti M, Reichenbach P (1990) Morphological classification of debris-flow processes in South-Central Alps (Italy). In: Proceedings of the 6th International IAEG Congress, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 1565–1572

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato Avanzi G, Giannecchini R, Puccinelli A (2004) The influence of the geological and geomorphological settings on shallow landslides. An example in a temperate climate environment: the June 19, 1996 event in the north western Tuscany (Italy). Eng Geol 73:215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delmonaco G, Leoni G, Margottini C, Puglisi C, Spizzichino D (2003) Large scale debris-flow hazard assessment: a geotechnical approach and GIS modelling. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:443–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Prete M, Guadagno FM, Hawkins AB (1998) Preliminary report on the landslides of 5 May 1998, Campania, southern Italy. Bull Eng Geol Environ 57:113–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vita P, Di Clemente E, Rolandi M, Celico P (2007) Engineering geological models of the initial landslides occurred on April 30 2006, at Mount di Vezzi (Ischia Island, Italy). Italian J Eng Geol Environ 2:119–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen SD, Wieczorek GF (1988) Landslides, floods, and marine effects of the storm of January 3–5, 1982, in the S. Francisco Bay Region, California. U.S. Geological Survey Professional paper, 1434, 310p

    Google Scholar 

  • Elter P, Giglia G, Tongiorgi M, Trevisan L (1975) Tensional and compressional areas in the recent (Tortonian to present) evolution of the Northern Apennines. Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata 17:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekanayake JC, Philipps CJ (2002) Slope stability thresholds for vegetated hillslopes: a composite model. Can Geotech J 39:849–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannecchini R (2005) Rainfall triggering soil slips in the southern Apuan Alps (Tuscany, Italy). 6th Plinius Conf. on Mediterranean Storms (EGU), Mediterranean Sea, 17–24 October 2004. Adv Geosci 2:21–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannecchini R (2006) Relationship between rainfall and shallow landslides in the Southern Apuan Alps (Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagno FM, Revellino P (2005) Debris avalanches and debris flows of the Campania Region (southern Italy). In: Jakob M, Hungr O (eds) Debris-flow Hazard and related phenomena. Springer, pp 489–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungr O, Evans SG, Bovis M, Hutchinson JN (2001) Review of the classification of landslides of the flow type. Environ Eng Geosci 7:221–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson JN (1988) Morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology. In: Bonnard C (ed) Proceedings of the 5th international symposium on landslides, vol 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T, Tanaka Y, Tadashi K, Kouji K, Kouichi S, Shinji T, Shintaro A (1995) Case study of rock debris avalanche gravel liquefied during 1993 Hokkaido-Nansei-Oki earthquake. Soil Found 35:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao SSC, Whitman RV (1986) Overburden correction factors for SPT in sand. J Geotech Eng 112(3):373–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Presti D, Sqeglia N (2008) Prove penetrometriche dinamiche. Hevelius (ed) Benevento, Italy, (in Italian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagani (2011) DPSH Dynamic penetrometers (TG 63–100; TG 63–150; TG 63–200). URL: http://www.pagani-geotechnical.com/index.php?id=67. Accessed 24 June 2011

  • Pandeli E, Ferrini G, Lazzari D (1994) Lithofacies and petrography of the Macigno formation from the Abetone to the Monti del Chianti areas (Northern Apennines). Memorie della Società Geologica Italiana 48:321–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson PK, Wride CE (1997) Cyclic liquefaction and its evaluation based on the SPT and CPT. In: Proceedings of the NCEER workshop on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils: technical report NCEER-97-0022, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, pp 41–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers DJ (2006) Subsurface exploration using the Standard Penetration Test and the Cone Penetration Test. Environ Eng Geosci 12(2):161–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassa K (1998) Recent urban landslide disasters in Japan and their mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference environmental management, vol 1, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 45–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmertmann JH (1978) Use of SPT to measure dynamic soil properties? Yes, but…!. In: Dynamic geotechnical testing, ASTM STP 654, pp 341–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Skempton AW (1986) Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and overconsolidation. Geotecnique 36(3):425–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanoff G, Sanglerat G, Bergdhal U, Melzer KJ (1988) Dynamic probing (DP): international reference test procedure. In: De Ruiter (ed) Proceedings of ISOPT-I, vol 1, Balkema, pp 53–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang C, Zhu J, Ding J, Cui X, Chen L, Zhang J (2011) Catastrophic debris flows triggered by a 14 August 2010 rainfall at the epicenter of the Wenchuan earthquake. Landslides. doi:10.1007/s10346-011-0269-5

  • Youd TL, Idriss IM (2001) Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(4):297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang FW, Sassa K, Wang G (2002) Mechanism of a long-runout landslide triggered by the August 1998 heavy rainfall in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Eng Geol 63:169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuri Galanti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Avanzi, G.D., Galanti, Y., Giannecchini, R., Duchi, S., Presti, D.L., Marchetti, D. (2013). DP Test in Geotechnical Characterization of Shallow Landslides Source Area: Results and Perspectives. In: Margottini, C., Canuti, P., Sassa, K. (eds) Landslide Science and Practice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31325-7_33

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics