Innovation niche stability with a short-term policy intervention

  • Antonio Lopolito
  • Piergiuseppe Morone
  • Richard Taylor
Part of the Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems book series (LNE, volume 662)


This article presents an agent-based (AB) model designed to investigate the emergence of innovation niches. The novel contribution of this paper is to assess whether the introduction of institutional agents of change (referred to as spreaders), whose sole activity is to persuade firms to switch from the dominant technology (i.e. the regime technology) to a new technology, can prompt the emergence of a stable and self-sustained innovation niche. The following two results were obtained: (1) as the number of spreaders in the system increases, the latency time required for the niche to take off reduces steadily; (2) policy withdrawal can take place and this does not compromise the pathway towards full niche development, although it considerably slows it down. However, policy withdrawal can only be carried out with conditions that a critical mass of users is reached. Interestingly, as the number of spreaders increases, the critical mass threshold increases as well, but the time required for reaching the threshold decreases. This result stresses the importance of social resources in the niche development process as well as the importance of a dense network of supporters


Policy Action Critical Mass Individual Power Perfect Competition Institutional Agent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kemp, R., 1994. Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability. The problem of technological regime shifts, Futures 26, 1023-1046.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kemp, R., Schot, J.W., Hoogma, R., 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of Strategic Niche Management, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10, 175-196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klepper, S., 1997. Industry Life Cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change 6, 145-81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lopolito, A., Morone, P., Taylor, R., 2012. Strategic Niche Management and Policy Actions: What does it takes to switch from supporter to adopter of a new technology? Submitted to Research Policy. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lopolito, A., Morone, P., Sisto, R., 2011a. Innovation niches and socio-technical transition: A case study of bio-refinery production. Futures 43, 27-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lopolito, A., Morone, P., Taylor, R., 2011b. Socio-technical transition pathways and social networks: a toolkit for empirical innovation studies. Economics Bulletin 30, 2720-2731.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raven, R.P.J.M., 2005. Strategic niche management for biomass. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology. Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rogers, E. M., 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, Fifth Edition. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilensky, U., 1999. NetLogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Lopolito
    • 1
  • Piergiuseppe Morone
    • 2
  • Richard Taylor
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. of Production and Innovation (PrIME)University of FoggiaFoggiaItaly
  2. 2.Dept. of EconomicsFoggiaItaly
  3. 3.Oxford OfficeStockholm Environment Institute,OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations