Fractionating and Determination of the Soluble Microbial Products

  • Bing-Jie Ni
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses, volume 131)

Abstract

The subfractions of the soluble microbial products (SMP), i.e., utilization-associated products (UAP), and biomass-associated products (BAP), were characterized in terms of formation sequence, MW and chemical natures, using MW and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) measurements, coupled with oxygen utilization rate determination, polysaccharide and protein measurement, 3-dimensional excitation emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analysis. A new approach for determining SMP, UAP and BAP, and their production kinetics was then established. The relationships among the formation of the three subfractions of the SMP and the substrate utilization, as well as the SMP formation mechanisms, were elucidated.

Keywords

Activate Sludge Extracellular Polymeric Substance Soluble Microbial Product External Substrate Excitation Emission Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Al-Halbouni, D., Dott, W., Hollender, J.: Occurrence and composition of extracellular lipids and polysaccharides in a full-scale membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 43, 97–106 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th edn. American Public Health Association, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  3. Aqino, S.F.D.: Formation of soluble microbial products (SMP) in anaerobic digesters during stress conditions. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College, London (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Aquino, S.F., Stuckey, D.C.: Integrated model of the production of soluble microbial products (SMP) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in anaerobic chemostats during transient conditions. Biochem. Eng. J. 38, 138–146 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barker, D.J., Stuckey, D.C.: A review of soluble microbial products (SMP) in wastewater treatment systems. Water Res. 33, 3063–3082 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciston, S., Lueptow, R.M., Gray, K.A.: Controlling biofilm growth using reactive ceramic ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 342, 263–268 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong, B., Jiang, S.: Characteristics and behaviors of soluble microbial products in sequencing batch membrane bioreactors at various sludge retention times. Desalination 243, 240–250 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao, M., Yang, M., Li, H., Yang, Q., Zhang, Y.: Comparison between a submerged membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge system on treating ammonia-bearing inorganic wastewater. J. Biotechnol. 108, 265–269 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grady Jr, C.P.L., Daigger, G.T., Lim, H.C.: Biological Wastewater Treatment, 2nd edn, pp. 282–284. Marcel Dekker, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  10. Gray, S.R., Ritchie, C.B., Tran, T., Bolto, B.A.: Effect of NOM characteristics and membrane type on microfiltration performance. Water Res. 41, 3833–3841 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gray, S.R., Ritchie, C.B., Tran, T., Bolto, B.A., Greenwood, P., Busetti, F., Allpike, B.: Effect of membrane character and solution chemistry on microfiltration performance. Water Res. 42, 743–753 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grunheid, S., Amy, G., Jekela, M.: Removal of bulk dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and trace organic compounds by bank filtration and artificial recharge. Water Res. 39, 3219–3228 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holakoo, L., Nakhla, G., Yanful, E.K., Bassi, A.S.: Chelating properties and molecular weight distribution of soluble microbial products from an aerobic membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 40, 1531–1538 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsieh, K.M., Murgel, G.A., Lion, L.W., Schuller, M.L.: Interactions of microbial biofilms with toxic trace metals 1. Observation and modeling of cell growth, attachment, and production of extracellular polymer. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44, 219–231 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ichihashi, O., Satoh, H., Mino, T.: Effect of soluble microbial products on microbial metabolisms related to nutrient removal. Water Res. 40, 1627–1633 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jarusutthirak, C., Amy, G., Croue, J.P.: Fouling characteristics of wastewater effluent organic matter (EfOM) isolates on NF and UF membranes. Desalination 145, 247–255 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jarusutthirak, C., Amy, G.: Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 969–974 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. Jarusutthirak, C., Amy, G: Understanding soluble microbial products (SMP) as a component of effluent organic matter (EfOM). Water Res. 41, 2787–2793 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. Jiang, T., Myngheer, S., De Pauw, D.J.W., Spanjers, H., Nopens, I., Kennedy, M.D., Amy, G., Vanrolleghem, P.A.: Modelling the production and degradation of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane bioreactors (MBR). Water Res. 42, 4955–4964 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kimura, K., Naruse, T., Watanabe, Y.: Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: relation to membrane fouling. Water Res. 43, 1033–1039 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Labbs, C., Amy, G., Jekel, M.: Understanding the size and character of fouling-causing substances from effluent organic matter (EfOM) in low-pressure membrane filtration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40, 4495–4499 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Laspidou, C.D., Rittmann, B.E.: A unified theory for extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 36, 2711–2720 (2002a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laspidou, C.S., Rittmann, B.E.: Non-steady state modeling of extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 36, 1983–1992 (2002b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Magbanua Jr, B.S., Bowers, A.R.: Characterization of soluble microbial products (SMP) derived from glucose and phenol in dual substrate activated sludge bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 93, 862–870 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Namkung, E., Rittmann, B.E.: Soluble microbial products (SMP) formation kinetics by biofilms. Water Res. 20, 795–806 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ni, B.J., Fang, F., Xie, W.M., Xu, J., Yu, H.Q.: Formation of distinct soluble microbial products by activated sludge: kinetic analysis and quantitative determination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 1667–1674 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ni, B.J., Zeng, R.J., Fang, F., Xie, W.M., Sheng, G.P., Yu, H.Q.: Fractionating soluble microbial products in the activated sludge process. Water Res. 44, 2292–2302 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Noguera, D.R., Araki, N., Rittmann, B.E.: Soluble microbial products in anaerobic chemostates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 44, 1040–1047 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Okamura, D., Mori, Y., Hashimoto, T., Hori, K.: Identification of biofoulant of membrane bioreactors in soluble microbial products. Water Res. 43, 4356–4362 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenberger, S., Laabs, C., Lesjean, B., Gnirss, R., Amy, G., Jekel, M., Schrotter, J.C.: Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 40, 710–719 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schiener, P., Nachaiyasit, S., Stuckey, D.C.: Production of soluble microbial products (SMP) in an anaerobic baffled reactor, composition, biodegradability and the effect of process parameters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 391–400 (1998)Google Scholar
  32. Shon, H.K., Vigneswaran, S., Kim, I.S., Cho, J., Ngo, H.H.: The effect of pretreatment to ultrafiltration of biologically treated sewage effluent: a detailed effluent organic matter (EfOM) characterization. Water Res. 38, 1933–1939 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, L.H., McCarty, P.L., Kitanidis, P.K.: Spreadsheet method for evaluation of biochemical reaction rate coefficients and their uncertainties by weighted nonlinear least-squares analysis of the integrated Monod equation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 2044–2050 (1998)Google Scholar
  34. Smith, P.J., Vigneswaran, S., Ngo, H.H., Ben-Aim, R., Nguyen, H.: A new approach to backwash initiation in membrane systems. J. Membr. Sci. 278, 381–389 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bing-Jie Ni
    • 1
  1. 1.Advanced Water Management CentreThe University of QueenslandSt. Lucia BrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations