Breast Density into Clinical Practice

  • Ralph Highnam
  • Natascha Sauber
  • Stamatia Destounis
  • Jennifer Harvey
  • Dennis McDonald
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7361)

Abstract

It is well established that breast density is related to breast cancer risk; making that connection precise, and understanding how to use it in clinical practice, has been a major academic focus since the 1970’s. However, it transpires that the first clinical uses of breast density have not been for risk prediction, rather they are for judging when to recommend further imaging. In this paper, we show how scientific research has had to be adapted in order to create the automated volumetric breast density assessment tool, Volpara®, to make it ready for actual clinical use and how it is impacting patient management.

Keywords

Breast density BI-RADS® 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pisano, E., et al.: Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital versus Film Mammography: Exploratory Analysis of Selected Population Subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 246(2), 376 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arora, N., King, T.A., Jacks, L.M., Stempel, M.M., Patil, S., Morris, E., Morrow, M.: Impact of Breast Density on the Presenting Features of Malignancy. Ann. Surg. Oncolol. 17, S211–S218 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berg, W.A., et al.: Combined Screening with Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer. JAMA 303(15), 1482 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steenbergen, S., Weigert, J.: The Connecticut Experiment: The Role of Ultrasound in the Screening of Dense Breasts. RSNA (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berg, W.A., Campassi, C., Langenberq, P., Sexton, M.J.: BIRADS: Inter-and Intra-Observer Variability in Feature Analysis and Final Assessment. AJR 174(6), 1769–1777 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harvey, J.A., Bovbjerg, V.E.: Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk. Radiology 230, 29–41 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nicholson, B.T., LoRusso, A.P., Smolkin, M., Bovbjerg, V.E., Petroni, G.R., Harvey, J.A.: Accuracy of Assigned BI-RADS Breast Density Category Definitions. Acad. Radiology 13(9), 1143–1149 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciatto, S., Visioli, C., Paci, E., Zappa, M.: Breast Density As a Determinant of Interval Cancer At Mammographic Screening. Breast Journal of Cancer 90, 393–396 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin, K.E., Helvie, M.A., Zhou, C., Roubidoux, M.A., Bailey, J.E., Paramaqul, C., Blane, C.E., Klein, K.A., Sonnad, S.S., Chan, H.P.: Mammographic Density Measured with Quantitative Computer-Aided Method: Comparison to Radiologists’ Estimates and BI-RADS categories. Radiology 240(3), 656–665 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ren, B., Smith, A.P., Marshall, J.: Investigation of Practical Scoring Methods for Breast Density. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds.) IWDM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6136, pp. 651–658. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ng, K.-H., Yip, C.-H., Taib, N.A.M.: Standardization of Clinical Breast Density Measurement. Lancet Oncology 13, 334 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Highnam, R., Brady, S.M., Yaffe, M.J., Karssemeijer, N., Harvey, J.: Robust Breast Composition Measurement - VolparaTM. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds.) IWDM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6136, pp. 342–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jeffreys, M., Harvey, J., Highnam, R.: Comparing a new volumetric breast density method (VolparaTM) to cumulus. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds.) IWDM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6136, pp. 408–413. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shepherd, J.A., Herve, L., Landau, J., Fan, B., Kerlikowske, K., Cummings, S.R.: Novel Use of Single X-ray Absorptiometry for Measuring Breast Density. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 4(2), 173–182 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Highnam, R., Brady, M.: Mammographic Image Analysis. Kluwer Academic Press (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Engeland, S., Snoeren, P.R., Huisman, H., Boetes, C., Karssemeijer, N.: Volumetric Breast Density Estimation From Full-Field Digital Mammograms. IEEE Medical Imaging 25(3) (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kopans, D.: Breast Imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ralph Highnam
    • 1
  • Natascha Sauber
    • 1
  • Stamatia Destounis
    • 2
  • Jennifer Harvey
    • 3
  • Dennis McDonald
    • 4
  1. 1.Matakina TechnologyWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Elizabeth Wende Breast Care, LLCRochesterUSA
  3. 3.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA
  4. 4.Sutter Health North Bay Women’s HealthSanta RosaUSA

Personalised recommendations