Advertisement

CoTAGs and ACGs

  • Gregory M. Kobele
  • Jens Michaelis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7351)

Abstract

Our main concern is to provide a complete picture of how coTAGs, as a particular variant within the general framework of tree adjoining grammars (TAGs), can be captured under the notion of abstract categorial grammars (ACGs). coTAGs have been introduced by Barker [1] as an “alternative conceptualization” in order to cope with the tension between the TAG-mantra of the “locality of syntactic dependencies” and the seeming non-locality of quantifier scope. We show how our formalization of Barker’s proposal leads to a class of higher order ACGs. By taking this particular perspective, Barker’s proposal turns out as a straightforward extension of the proposal of Pogodalla [11], where the former in addition to “simple” inverse scope phenomena also captures inverse linking and non-inverse linking phenomena.

Keywords

Atomic Type Lexical Entry Interior Node Elementary Tree Scope Reading 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barker, C.: Cosubstitution, derivational locality, and quantifier scope. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms (TAG+10), New Haven, CT, pp. 135–142 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauderon, M., Courcelle, B.: Graph expressions and graph rewriting. Mathematical Systems Theory 20, 83–127 (1987)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    de Groote, P.: Towards abstract categorial grammars. In: 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2001), Toulouse, pp. 252–259. ACL (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Groote, P.: Tree-adjoining grammars as abstract categorial grammars. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms (TAG+6), Venezia, pp. 145–150 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habel, A., Kreowski, H.J.: Some Structural Aspects of Hypergraph Languages Generated by Hyperedge Replacement. In: Brandenburg, F.J., Vidal-Naquet, G., Wirsing, M. (eds.) STACS 1987. LNCS, vol. 247, pp. 207–219. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joshi, A.K.: An introduction to tree adjoining grammars. In: Manaster-Ramer, A. (ed.) Mathematics of Language, pp. 87–114. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (1987)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Joshi, A.K., Schabes, Y.: Tree adjoining grammars. In: Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Languages, vol. 3, pp. 69–124. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kanazawa, M.: Parsing and generation as datalog queries. In: 45th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2007), Prague, pp. 176–183. ACL (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kanazawa, M.: Second-order abstract categorial grammars as hyperedge replacement grammars. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19, 137–161 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pogodalla, S.: Computing semantic representation. Towards ACG abstract terms as derivation trees. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms (TAG+7), Vancouver, BC, pp. 64–71 (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pogodalla, S.: Ambiguïté de portée et approche fonctionnelle des grammaires d’arbres adjoints. In: Traitement Automatique des Langues Naturelles (TALN 2007), Toulouse, 10 pages (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salvati, S.: Encoding second order string ACG with deterministic tree walking transducers. In: Wintner, S. (ed.) Proceedings of FG 2006: The 11th Conference on Formal Grammar, pp. 143–156. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregory M. Kobele
    • 1
  • Jens Michaelis
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Bielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations