Abstract
Eye movement patterns of science- and non-science students in solving scientific graph problems were compared. Experts (science-students) tended to spend more time, compared to novices, to comprehend the questions during the first run / inspection. Concerning the main graph region, both the True and False subregions (corresponding to correct and wrong answer choices, respectively) were inspected carefully during the first run. Significant differences were observed in the second run, in which the False region was fixated longer when participants made wrong responses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., Säljö, R.: Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review 23(4), 523–552 (2011)
Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., van Gog, T.: In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction 20(2), 146–154 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yen, MH., Lee, CN., Yang, YC. (2012). Eye Movement Patterns in Solving Scientific Graph Problems. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7352. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_46
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31222-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31223-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)