Skip to main content

Psychological Evidence of Mental Segmentation in Table Reading

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNAI,volume 7352)

Abstract

How we organize elements when reading a table was examined in a psychological experiment using a modified spatial-cuing paradigm. Table-like stimuli consisting of 16 square elements arranged in a four-by-four matrix form were used. Participants were instructed to discriminate whether the presented stimuli could be read as containing either one element or two elements in accordance with the induced reading direction. The results showed that when two elements were presented along with the induced direction, it was easier to read as such than when two elements were presented orthogonal to the induced direction. Although there was no contour line in the stimuli, participants were able to mentally segment and organize them into global units lying in the particular direction, which was instrumental to reading the tables efficiently.

Keywords

  • object-based attention
  • table reading
  • global unit

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cleveland, W.S., McGill, R.: An experiment in graphical perception. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 25(5), 491–500 (1986)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Spence, I.: Visual psychophysics of simple graphical elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16(4), 683–692 (1990)

    CrossRef  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gattis, M., Holyoak, K.J.: Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 22(1), 231–239 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pinker, S.: A theory of graph comprehension. In: Aritificial Intelligence and the Future of Testing, pp. 73–126. L. Erlbaum Associates (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter, P., Shah, P.: A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 4(2), 75–100 (1998)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Peebles, D., Cheng, P.C.: Modeling the effect of task and graphical representation on response latency in a graph reading task. Human Factors 45(1), 28–46 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Egly, R., Driver, J., Rafal, R.D.: Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123(3), 161–177 (1994)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Roelfsema, P.R., Lamme, V.A.F., Spekreijse, H.: The implementation of visual routines. Vision Research 40, 1385–1411 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Roelfsema, P.R.: Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Review of Neuroscience 29, 203–227 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Ullman, S.: Visual routines. Cognition 18, 97–159 (1984)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Duncan, J.: Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113(4), 501–517 (1984)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Kramer, A.F., Jacobson, A.: Perceptual organization and focused attention: the role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics 50(3), 267–284 (1991)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertin, J.: Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tufte, E.R.: Envisioning information. Graphics Press, Cheshire (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cleveland, W.S.: The Elements of Graphing Data. Hobart Press, Summit (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kosslyn, S.M.: Elements of Graph Design. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brainard, D.H.: The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10(4), 433–436 (1997)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Masson, M.E.J., Loftus, G.R.: Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 57(3), 202–220 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jansen, A.R., Marriott, K., Yelland, G.W.: Comprehension of algebraic expressions by experienced users of mathematics. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 56A(1), 3–30 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sugio, T., Shimojima, A., Katagiri, Y. (2012). Psychological Evidence of Mental Segmentation in Table Reading. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7352. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31222-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31223-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)