Advertisement

The Design of a Segway AR-Tactile Navigation System

  • Ming Li
  • Lars Mahnkopf
  • Leif Kobbelt
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7319)

Abstract

A Segway is often used to transport a user across mid range distances in urban environments. It has more degrees of freedom than car/bike and is faster than pedestrian. However a navigation system designed for it has not been researched. The existing navigation systems are adapted for car drivers or pedestrians. Using such systems on the Segway can increase the driver’s cognitive workload and generate safety risks. In this paper, we present a Segway AR-Tactile navigation system, in which we visualize the route through an Augmented Reality interface displayed by a mobile phone. The turning instructions are presented to the driver via vibro-tactile actuators attached to the handlebar. Multiple vibro-tactile patterns provide navigation instructions. We evaluate the system in real traffic and an artificial environment. Our results show the AR interface reduces users’ subjective workload significantly. The vibro-tactile patterns can be perceived correctly and greatly improve the driving performance.

Keywords

Segway Navigation Augmented Reality Vibro-Tactile Feedback modalities Real Traffic Evaluation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Aleccia, J.: Segway scooters can lead to serious injuries, experts warn. Website (2010), http://goo.gl/r2QRL
  5. 5.
    Boll, S., Asif, A., Heuten, W.: Feel your route: A tactile display for car navigation. IEEE Pervasive Computing 10(3), 35–42 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Vries, S.C., Van Erp, J.B.F., Kiefer, R.J.: Direction coding using a tactile chair. Applied Ergonomics 40(3), 477–484 (2009), http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003687008001531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van Erp, J.B.F.: Vibro-tactile information presentation in automobiles, University of Birmingham, pp. 99–104 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Erp, J.B.F.: Guidelines for the use of vibro-tactile displays in human computer interaction. Human Factors, 18–22 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jensen, B.S., Skov, M.B., Thiruravichandran, N.: Studying driver attention and behaviour for three configurations of gps navigation in real traffic driving. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, pp. 1271–1280. ACM, New York (2010), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1753326.1753517 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kern, D., Marshall, P., Hornecker, E., Rogers, Y., Schmidt, A.: Enhancing Navigation Information with Tactile Output Embedded into the Steering Wheel. In: Tokuda, H., Beigl, M., Friday, A., Brush, A.J.B., Tobe, Y. (eds.) Pervasive 2009. LNCS, vol. 5538, pp. 42–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mattes, S.: The lane change task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Medenica, Z., Kun, A.L., Paek, T., Palinko, O.: Augmented reality vs. street views: A driving simulator study comparing two emerging navigation aids. In: Mobile HCI 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pielot, M., Poppinga, B., Boll, S.: Pocketnavigator: vibro-tactile waypoint navigation for everyday mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI 2010, pp. 423–426. ACM, New York (2010), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1851600.1851696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poppinga, B., Pielot, M., Boll, S.: Tacticycle: a tactile display for supporting tourists on a bicycle trip, vol. 41. ACM (2009), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1613911
  15. 15.
    Ross, D.A., Blasch, B.B.: Wearable interfaces for orientation and wayfinding. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, Assets 2000, pp. 193–200. ACM, New York (2000), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/354324.354380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmidt-Belz, B., Laamanen, H., Poslad, S., Zipf, A.: Location-based mobile tourist services: first user experiences. In: Conference for Information and Communication Technologies in Travel & Tourism, pp. 115–123Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Srikulwong, M., O’Neill, E.: A comparative study of tactile representation techniques for landmarks on a wearable device. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, pp. 2029–2038. ACM, New York (2011), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1978942.1979236 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ueda, J.: Wearable device that vibrates fingertip could improve one’s sense of touch (August 4, 2011), http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-08-wearable-device-vibrates-fingertip.html
  19. 19.
    Wickens, C.D.: Processing Resources in Attention. Academic Press (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ming Li
    • 1
  • Lars Mahnkopf
    • 1
  • Leif Kobbelt
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Graphics GroupRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations