Advertisement

Software Sustainability from a Process-Centric Perspective

  • Giuseppe Lami
  • Fabrizio Fabbrini
  • Mario Fusani
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 301)

Abstract

ICT significantly contributes to the global carbon dioxide production. In the last years the research addressed the problem of increasing ICT sustainability from different perspectives. In this paper this problem is addressed from a software process perspective. Sustainability of software process is approached in a systematic way by defining a core set of processes that represent the activities to be performed in order to introduce and integrate the greenness culture in an organization developing software. The processes have been defined so that they can be measured in terms of process capability according to the ISO/IEC 15504 standard. The relationships between process capability and sustainability are discussed as well.

Keywords

Software Process Carbon Footprint Process Capability Process Definition Improve Software Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Naumann, S., Dick, M., Kern, E., Johann, T.: The GREENSOFT Model: A Reference Model for Green and Sustainable Software and its Engineering. Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems 1, 294–304 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC IS 15504, Information technology – Process assessment, Parts 1-10, International Organization for Standardization (2001-2011) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO/IEC IS 12207:2008, Systems and software engineering — Software life cycle processes. International Organization for Standardization (2008) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Marco, T., Lister, T.: Controlling Software Projects: Management, Measurement, and Evaluation, Seminar Notes. Atlantic Systems Guild Inc., New York (1984)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gartner, Inc.: Gartner Estimates ICT Industry Accounts for 2 Percent of Global CO2 Emissions, http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=503867 (accessed March 2, 2012)
  6. 6.
    Sverdrup, H., Svensson, M.G.E.: Defining the Concept of Sustainability. Systems Approaches and Their Application, 143–164 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gordon, J., Skinner, A., Button, A. (eds.): World Economic Forum Green Technology: Driving Economical and Environmental Benefits from ICT (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hilty, L.M., Lohmann, W.: The Five Most Neglected Issues in “Green IT”. CEPIS Upgrade The European Journal for the Informatics Professional XII(4) (October 2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taina, J.: Good, Bad, and Beautiful Software – In Search of Green Software Quality Factors. CEPIS Upgrade The European Journal for the Informatics Professional XII(4) (October 2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rivoire, S., et al.: Models and Metrics to Enable Energy-efficiency Optimization. IEEE Computer (December 2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Capra, E., Merlo, F.: Green IT: Everything Starts from the Software. In: 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona, Italy (2009) Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johann, T., Dick, M., Kern, E., Naumann, S.: Sustainable Development, Sustainable Software, and Sustainable Software Engineering. In: Int.l Symposium on Humanities, Science and Engineering Research, Kuala Lampur, June 6-7. IEEE Publisher (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tate, K.: Sustainable software development: An agile perspective. Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Binswanger, M.: Technological Progress and Sustain- able Development: What About the Rebound Effect? Ecological Economics 36, 119–132 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hilty, L.M., Köhler, A., von Schéele, F., Zah, R., Ruddy, T.: Rebound Effects of Progress in Information Technology. Poiesis & Praxis. International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science 1(4), 19–38 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Darnall, N., Gallagher, D.R., Andrews, R.N.L.: ISO 14001: Greening management systems. In: Sarkis, J. (ed.) Greener Manufacturing and Operations, pp. 179–190. Sheffield, Greenleaf (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miles, M.P., Russel, G.P.: ISO 14000 total quality environmental management: the integration of environmental marketing, total quality management, and corporate environ- mental policy. Journal of Quality Management 2(1), 151–168 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chrissis, M.B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S.: CMMI Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdel-Hamid, T.K., Madnick, S.E.: A model of software project management dynamics. In: Proc. IEEE COMPSAC 1982, pp. 539–554 (November 1982)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Software Engineering Institute ”CMMI for Development, Version 1.3” CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033 (November 2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Lami
    • 1
  • Fabrizio Fabbrini
    • 1
  • Mario Fusani
    • 1
  1. 1.Consiglio Nazionale delle RicercheIstituto di Scienza e Tecnologie della InformazionePisaItaly

Personalised recommendations