Advertisement

Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Conceptual Modelling

  • Bernhard Thalheim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7337)

Abstract

Models, modelling languages, modelling frameworks and their background have dominated conceptual modelling research and information systems engineering for last four decades. Conceptual models are mediators between the application world and the implementation or system world. Currently conceptual modelling is rather a craft and at the best an art. We target on a science and culture of conceptual modelling. Models are governed by their purpose. They are used by a community of practice and have a function within application cases. Language-based models use a language as a carrier. Therefore, semiotics of models must be systematically developed. This paper thus concentrates on the linguistic foundation of conceptual modelling.

Keywords

Integrity Constraint Link Schema Referential Meaning Structural Abstraction Cognitive Semantic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Agassi, J.: Why there is no theory of models. In: Niiniluoto, I., Herfel, W.E., Krajewsky, W., Wojcicki, R. (eds.) Theories and Models in Scientific Processes, Amsterdam, Atlanta, pp. 17–26 (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dahanayake, A., Thalheim, B.: Towards a Framework for Emergent Modeling. In: Trujillo, J., Dobbie, G., Kangassalo, H., Hartmann, S., Kirchberg, M., Rossi, M., Reinhartz-Berger, I., Zimányi, E., Frasincar, F. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6413, pp. 128–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dahanayake, A., Thalheim, B.: Enriching Conceptual Modelling Practices through Design Science. In: Halpin, T., Nurcan, S., Krogstie, J., Soffer, P., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Bider, I. (eds.) BPMDS 2011 and EMMSAD 2011. LNBIP, vol. 81, pp. 497–510. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ginsburg, R.S., Khidekei, S.S., Knyazeva, G.Y., Sankin, A.A.: A course in modern English lexicology, 2nd edn. Vysschaja Schkola, Moscov (1979) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Halloun, I.A.: Modeling Theory in Science Education. Springer, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hausser, R.: Foundations of computational linguistics - human-computer communication in natural language, 2nd edn. Springer (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaschek, R.: Konzeptionelle Modellierung. PhD thesis, University Klagenfurt, Habilitationsschrift (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Korta, K., Perry, J.: Critical Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krogstie, J.: Quality of uml. In: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (IV), pp. 2387–2391 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mahr, B.: Information science and the logic of models. Software and System Modeling 8(3), 365–383 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ritchey, T.: Outline for a morphology of modelling methods-Contribution to a general theory of modellingGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stachowiak, H.: Modell. In: Seiffert, H., Radnitzky, G. (eds.) Handlexikon zur Wissenschaftstheorie, pp. 219–222. Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, München (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steinmüller, W.: Informationstechnologie und Gesellschaft: Einführung in die Angewandte Informatik. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thalheim, B.: Entity-relationship modeling – Foundations of database technology. Springer, Berlin (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thalheim, B.: Towards a theory of conceptual modelling. Journal of Universal Computer Science 16(20), 3102–3137 (2010), http://www.jucs.org/jucs_16_20/towards_a_theory_of zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thalheim, B.: The art of conceptual modelling. In: Proc. EJC 2011, Tallinn, pp. 203–222 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thalheim, B.: The Science of Conceptual Modelling. In: Hameurlain, A., Liddle, S.W., Schewe, K.-D., Zhou, X. (eds.) DEXA 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6860, pp. 12–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thalheim, B.: The theory of conceptual models, the theory of conceptual modelling and foundations of conceptual modelling. In: The Handbook of Conceptual Modeling: Its Usage and Its Challenges, ch.12, pp. 543–578. Springer, Berlin (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Whorf, B.L.: Lost generation theories of mind, language, and religion. Popular Culture Association, University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Mich. (1980)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wojcicki, R.: Wyklady z logiki z elementami teorii wiedzy. Wyd. Naukowe SCHOLAR (2003) (in polish)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernhard Thalheim
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science InstituteChristian-Albrechts-University KielGermany

Personalised recommendations