Advertisement

Enforcement

  • Eun Sup Lee
Chapter

Learning Objectives

This chapter is to help students understand:
  1. 1.

    Basic objectives of the provisions on enforcing protection of intellectual property rights under TRIPs;

     
  2. 2.

    Civil and administrative measures required to be available in respect of any activity infringing intellectual property rights covered in TRIPs;

     
  3. 3.

    Provisional measures to permit effective action against infringements and to include expeditious remedies under TRIPs;

     
  4. 4.

    Necessity to enforce the border measures for the proper protection of intellectual property rights;

     
  5. 5.

    Criminal procedures applied in cases of willful trade mark counterfeiting or copyright piracy on a commercial scale.

     

Keywords

Intellectual Property Supra Note Dispute Settlement Criminal Procedure Uruguay Round 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott FM (1996) The new global technology regime: the WTO TRIPs agreement and global economic development. Chicago-Kent Law Rev 72Google Scholar
  2. Abbott FM (1997) WTO dispute settlement and the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights, in international trade law and the GATT-WTO dispute settlement system. Kluwer Law InternationalGoogle Scholar
  3. Abbott FM (1997) The future of the multilateral trading system in the context of TRIPS. Hastings Int’l Comp Law Rev 20Google Scholar
  4. Abbott FM (1998) The enduring enigma of TRIPs: a challenge for the world economic system. J Int’l Econ LawGoogle Scholar
  5. Aberto C (1989) The economics of intellectual property rights and the GATT: a view from the south. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 22Google Scholar
  6. Anawalt HC (2003) International intellectual property, progress, and the rule of law. Santa Clara Computer & High Tech Law J 19Google Scholar
  7. Bhala R, Gantz DA (2003) Intellectual property and trademarks rights. Arizona J Int’l Comp Law 20Google Scholar
  8. Braga CAP (1995) Trade-related intellectual property issue: the Uruguay round agreement and its economic implications, in the Uruguay round and the developing countriesGoogle Scholar
  9. Braga CAP and Fink C (1998) The relationship between intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. Duke J Comp & Int’l Law 9Google Scholar
  10. Cahn S, Schimmel D (1997) The cultural exception: does it exist in GATT and GATS frameworks? how does it affect or is it affected by the agreement on TRIPs? Cardozo Arts & Ent Law J 15Google Scholar
  11. Correa CM (2002) Public health and international laws: unfair competition under the TRIPs greement: protection of data submitted for the registration of pharmaceuticals. Chicago J Int’l LawGoogle Scholar
  12. Croome J (1995) Reshaping the world trading system: a history of the Uruguay round. The World Trade Organization, Geneva, p. 130Google Scholar
  13. Curci FX (2002) Symposium: transnational business law in the twenty-first century: protecting your intellectual property rights overseas. Transnat’l Law 15Google Scholar
  14. Divney JA, Connell GJ (1994) Intellectual property provisions of the GATT. University of Colorado Law Rev 23Google Scholar
  15. Doane ML (1994) TRIPS and international intellectual property protection in an age of advancing technology. American University J Int’l Law & Policy 9Google Scholar
  16. Drahos P, Braithwaite J (2002) Proceedings of the 2002 conference access to medicines in the developing world: international facilitation or hindrance? Wisconsin Int’l Law J 20Google Scholar
  17. Dreier T (1996) TRIPS and the enforcement of intellectual property rights, in from GATT to TRIPS-the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. In: Beier F-K and Schricker G (eds.) John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Dreyfuss RC, Lowenfeld AF (1997) Two achievement of the Uruguay round: putting TRIPs and dispute settlement together. Virginia J Int’l Law 37Google Scholar
  19. Farkas LP (1996) Trade-related aspects of intellectual property, in world trade organization, the multilateral framework for the 21st century and U.S. implementing legislation. In: Stewart TP (ed) ABA Section of International Law and PracticeGoogle Scholar
  20. Folsom RH et al. (1995) International business transactions, Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar
  21. Fried JT (1994) Two paradigms for the rule of international trade las. United States Law J 39Google Scholar
  22. Gana R (1996) Prospects for developing countries under the TRIPs agreement. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 29Google Scholar
  23. Garcia G (2000) Economic development and the course of intellectual property protection in Mexico. Int’l Law J 27Google Scholar
  24. Geller PE (1995) Intellectual property in the global marketplace: impact of TRIPs dispute settlement? Int’l Law 29Google Scholar
  25. Hill E (1990) U.S. addresses contentious issues in negotiation on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Business America 18Google Scholar
  26. Hoekman B, Kosteck M (1995) The political economy of the world trading system: from GATT to WTO. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  27. Holwick S (1999) Trade and the environment: developing nations and the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Colorado J Int’l: Environ Law & PolicyGoogle Scholar
  28. Karjala D, Sugiyama K (1988) Fundamental concept of Japanese and American copyright law. America J Comp Law 36Google Scholar
  29. Kastenmeier RW, Beier D (1989) International trade and intellectual property: promise, risks and reality. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 22Google Scholar
  30. Kennedy KC (1998)The GATT-WTO system at fifty. Wisconsin Int’l Law J 16Google Scholar
  31. Land JN (2004) Intellectual property protection as viewed through the European community’s treatment of geographical indications: what lessons can TRIPs learn? Cardozo J Int’l & Comp Law 11Google Scholar
  32. Lehmann M (1985) The theory of property rights and the protection of rev. Indus. Property & Copyright LawGoogle Scholar
  33. Mangassarian E (2001) Technological trends and the changing face of international intellectual property law. Int’l Legal Perspectives 11Google Scholar
  34. Maskus KE, Denubarti M (1995) How trade-related are intellectual property rights? J Int’l Econ 39Google Scholar
  35. Ugolini MA (1999) Gray-market goods under the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Transnat’l Law 12Google Scholar
  36. O’Sullivan MJ (2000) International copyright: protection for copyright holders in the Internet age. N.Y. Int’l Law Rev 13Google Scholar
  37. Oman R (1994) Intellectual property after the Uruguay round. J Copyright Soc U.S.A. 42Google Scholar
  38. Otten A, Wager H (1996) Compliance with TRIPs: the emerging world view. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 29Google Scholar
  39. Pechman RJ (1998) Seeking multilateral protection for intellectual property: the United States “TRIPs” over special Global Trade 7, p. 301Google Scholar
  40. Preeg EH (1995) Trades in a brave new world; the Uruguay round and the future of the international trading system. International trade regulation. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Reed C (2012) Computer law, 7th edn. Universal Law Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  42. Reichman JH (1989) Intellectual property in international trade: opportunities and risks of a GATT connection. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 22Google Scholar
  43. Reichman JH (1993) The TRIPS component of the GATT’s Uruguay round; competitive prospects for intellectual property owners in an integrated world market. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media Ent Law J 4Google Scholar
  44. Reichman JH (1995) Universal minimum standards of intellectual property protection under the TRIPS component of the WTO agreement. Int’l Law 29Google Scholar
  45. Reichman JH (1996) Compliance with the TRIPs agreement: introduction to scholorly debate. Vanderbilt J Transnat’l Law 29Google Scholar
  46. Reichman JH (1997) Symposium: intellectual property law in the international marketplace: trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Virginia J Int’l Law 37Google Scholar
  47. Reichman JH (2000) The TRIPs agreement comes of age: conflict or cooperation with the developing countries? Int’l Law 32Google Scholar
  48. Romano F (1998) Global trademark and copyright 1998: protecting intellectual property rights in the international marketplace. International Conventions and TreatiesGoogle Scholar
  49. Schaffter R, Earle B, Agusti F (2002) International business law and its environment. Thomson/WesternGoogle Scholar
  50. Sell SK (2002) Industry strategies for intellectual property and trade: the quest for TRIPs, and post-TRIPs strategies. Cardozo J Int’l Comp Law 10Google Scholar
  51. Simon E (1994) The integration of intellectual property and trade policy. ALAIGoogle Scholar
  52. Su E (2000) The winners and the losers: the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights and its effects on developing countries. J Int’l Law 23Google Scholar
  53. Ullrich H (1995) TRIPS; adequate protection, inadequate trade, adequate competition policy. Pacific Rim Law & Policy J 4Google Scholar
  54. Williamson D (1989) Addressing inadequate intellectual property protection in the Uruguay round. Business America 4Google Scholar
  55. Young MK (1996) Dispute resolution in the Uruguay round: lawyers triumph over diplomats. Int’l Law 29Google Scholar
  56. Yu PK (2002) Symposium: world trade intellectual property and the global elites: international lawmaking in the new millennium: an introduction. Int’l & Comp Law 10Google Scholar
  57. Appellate Body Report, United States-Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998, WT/DS176/AB/R, (Jan. 2, 2002)Google Scholar
  58. Panel Report, United States-Section 211 Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1998, WT/DS176/R, (Aug. 6, 2001)Google Scholar
  59. Universal Copyright Convention, Sept. 6, 1952, 6 U.S.T. 2731, 216 U.N.T.S. 134, revised by 25 U.S.T. 1341, 943 U.N.T.S. 178, July 24, 1971.Google Scholar
  60. WTO, Agreement on Trade – Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, April 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex C, Legal Instruments-Results of the Uruguay Round, Vol. 33, I.L.M. (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of International TradePusan National UniversityPusanRepublic of South Korea

Personalised recommendations