Advertisement

Immersed in Immersion: Simulation as Technology and Theory of Mind

  • John Z. Elias
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 44)

Introduction

Cognitive theories involving the notion of simulation have developed hand in hand with the advancement and pervasiveness of simulation technologies. This intimate interrelation suggests the promise of implementing simulation technology in cognitive research, as well as in the facilitation and manipulation of cognitive and affective mechanisms for learning and training. In this chapter I describe the general interdependence of forms of technology and theories of mind, the former often furnishing metaphors for the latter, and offer a brief historical sketch leading up to the recent emergence of the centrality of simulation. I then follow with a critical evaluation of the role of simulation in current cognitive theories, and relate these critiques to philosophical concerns about the ontological, epistemological, and methodological status of modeling and simulation as a research tool. I end with some illustrative examples from cognitive research and therapy, and point towards potential future applications.

Keywords

Mirror Neuron Rubber Hand Simulation Technology Phantom Limb Simulation Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blanke, O., Mohr, C., Michel, C.M., Pascual-Leone, A., Brugger, P., Seeck, M., Landis, T., Thut, G.: Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to mental own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction. The Journal of Neuroscience 25(3), 550–557 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botvinick, M., Cohen, J.: Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see. Nature 391, 756 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Capelari, E.D.P., Uribe, C., Brasil-Neto, J.P.: Feeling pain in the rubber hand: Integration of visual, proprioceptive, and painful stimuli. Perception 38(1), 92–99 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carruthers, P., Smith, P.K. (eds.): Theories of Theory of Mind. Cambridge University Press (1996)Google Scholar
  5. Clark, A.: Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford University Press (2003)Google Scholar
  6. Decety, J., Grezes, J.: The power of simulation: Imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Research 1079, 4–14 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Desmurget, M., Grafton, S.: Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Science (4), 423–431 (2000)Google Scholar
  8. Draaisma, D.: Metaphors of memory: A history of ideas about the mind. Cambridge University Press (2000)Google Scholar
  9. Froese, T., Gallagher, S.: Phenomenology and Artificial Life: Toward a Technological Supplementation of Phenomenological Methodology. Husserl Studies 26(2), 83–106 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gaggioli, A., Amoresano, A., Gruppioni, E., Verni, G., Riva, G.: A myoelectric-controlled virtual hand for the assessment and treatment of phantom limb pain in trans-radial upper extremity amputees: a research protocol. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 154, 220–222 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. Gallagher, S.: How the body shapes the mind, Oxford, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  12. Gallagher, S.: Simulation trouble. Social Neuroscience (2), 353–365 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. Gallese, V., Goldman, A.: Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(12), 493–501 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gallese, V., Sinigaglia, C.: What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(11), 512–519 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gibson, J.: The theory of affordances. In: Shaw, R., Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, pp. 67–82. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1977)Google Scholar
  16. Giraux, P., Sirigu, A.: Illusory movements of the paralyzed limb restore motor cortex activity. Neuroimage 20, 107–111 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glenberg, A.M., Gutierrez, T., Levin, J.R., Japuntich, S., Kaschak, M.P.: Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology 96(3), 424–436 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldman, A.: Simulation theory and mental concepts. In: Dokic, J., Proust, J. (eds.) Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  19. Grüne-Yanoff, T., Weirich, P.: The philosophy and epistemology of simulation: a review. Simulation & Gaming 41(1), 20–50 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hesslow, G.: Conscious thought as simulation of behavior and perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6(6), 242–247 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Humphreys, P.: The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods. Synthese 169, 615–626 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurley, S.L.: The shared circuits model (SCM): How control, mirroring, and simulation can enable imitation, deliberation, and mindreading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(1), 1–58 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hutto, D.D.: Cognition without Representation. In: Riegler, A., Peschl, M., von Stein, A. (eds.) Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences: Does Representation Need Reality?. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  24. Knill, D.C., Pouget, A.: The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends in Neuroscience 27(12), 712–719 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Perseus Books, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  26. Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., Blanke, O.: Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 317, 1096–1099 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meister, I.G., Krings, T., Foltys, H., Boroojerdi, B., Müller, M., Töpper, R., Thron, A.: Playing piano in the mind – an fMRI study on music imagery and performance in pianists. Cognitive Brain Research 19, 219–228 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morrow, P.B., Elias, J., Streater, J., Ososky, S., Phillips, E., Fiore, S., Jentsch, F.: Embodied cognitive fidelity and the advancement of human robot team simulations. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 55(1), 1506–1510 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mukamel, R., Ekstrom, A.D., Kaplan, J., Iacoboni, M., Fried, I.: Single-neuron responses in humans during execution and observation of actions. Current Biology 20, 750–756 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Murray, C.D., Pettifer, S., Howard, T., Patchick, E.L., Caillette, F., Kulkarni, J., Bamford, C.: The treatment of phantom limb pain using immersive virtual reality: three case studies. Disability & Rehabilitation 29(18), 1465–1469 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pylyshyn, Z.W.: Computers and the Symbolization of Knowledge. In: Morelli, Anselmi, Brown, Haberlandt, Lloyd (eds.) Minds, Brains and Computers: Perspectives in Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence. Ablex (1993)Google Scholar
  32. Pylyshyn, Z.W.: What’s in your mind? In: Lepore, E., Pylyshyn, Z. (eds.) What is Cognitive Science. Blackwell, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  33. Quine, W.V.: On empirically equivalent systems of the world. Erkenntnis 9(3), 313–328 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramachandran, V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D., Stewart, M.I.: Perceptual correlates of massive cortical reorganization. Science 258(5085), 1159–1160 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L.: Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research 3, 131–141 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Searle, J.: Mind: A Brief Introduction. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  37. Speer, N.K., Reynolds, J.R., Swallow, K.M., Zacks, J.M.: Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences. Psychological Science 20, 989–999 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tolk, A.: Using Simulation Systems for Decision Support. In: Abu-Taieh, E.M.O., El Sheikh, A.A. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Discrete Event Simulation Environments: Technologies and Applications, pp. 317–336. IGI Global, Hershey (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Turkle, S.: Simulation and Its Discontents. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  40. Wastell, D.G.: Learning dysfunctions in information systems development: Overcoming the social defense with transitional objects. MIS Quarterly 23(4), 581–600 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weiskopf, D.: Embodied cognition and linguistic understanding. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41(3), 294–304 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Blackwell Publishing, Malden (1953)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Z. Elias
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Central FloridaOrlandoUnited Sates

Personalised recommendations