Configurable Process Models for the Swedish Public Sector

  • Carl-Mikael Lönn
  • Elin Uppström
  • Petia Wohed
  • Gustaf Juell-Skielse
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7328)


Process orientation and e-services have become essential in revitalizing local government. Although most municipalities offer similar services there is little reuse of e-services or underlying process models among municipalities. Configurable process models represent a promising solution to this challenge by integrating numerous variations of a process in one general model. In this study, design science is used to develop a configurable process model to capture the variability of a number of different processes. The results include a validated configurable process model for social services, a benefits analysis and directions for future development. Although the results are perceived useful by municipal officials, there are several challenges to be met before the benefits of configurable process models are fully utilized.


Configurable process models public administration processes e-services e-government 


  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., Gottschalk, F., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J.: Correctness-Preserving Configuration of Business Process Models. In: Fiadeiro, J.L., Inverardi, P. (eds.) FASE 2008. LNCS, vol. 4961, pp. 46–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., Gottschalk, F., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J.: Preserving correctness during business process model configuration. Formal Asp. Comput. 22(3-4), 459–482 (2010)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    YAWL foundation. YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language, (accessed November 2011)
  4. 4.
    Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., La Rosa, M.: Configurable Workflow Models. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 17(2), 177–221 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gottschalk, F., Wagemakers, T.A.C., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., van der Aalst, W.M.P., La Rosa, M.: Configurable Process Models: Experiences from a Municipality Case Study. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 486–500. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Guaranteeing Soundness of Configurable Process Variants in Provop. In: Hofreiter, B., Werthner, H. (eds.) Prof. of IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, pp. 98–105. IEEE Computer Society (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–106 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ter Hofstede, A.,van der Aalst W.M.P., Adams, M., Russell, N. (eds.): Modern Business Process Automation: YAWL and its Support Environment. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Juell-Skielse, G., Wohed, P.: Design of an Open Social E-Service for Assisted Living. In: Wimmer, M.A., Chappelet, J.-L., Janssen, M., Scholl, H.J. (eds.) EGOV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6228, pp. 289–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dumas La Rosa, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Questionnaire-based Variability Modeling for System Configuration. Software and Systems Modeling (SoSyM) 8(2) (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Seven process modeling guidelines (7pmg). Information & Software Technology 52(2), 127–136 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mendling, J., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Getting Rid of the OR-Join in Business Process Models. In: 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC 2007), pp. 3–14. IEEE Computer Society (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neale, P., Thapa, S., Boyce, C.: Prepareing A Case Study: A Guide for Designing and Conducting a Case Study for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder International (May 2006) (accessed November 2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Razavian, M., Khosravi, R.: Modeling Variability in Business Process Models Using UML. In: Proc. of 5th Int. Conf. on Information Technology: New Generations. IEEE Computer Society (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    La Rosa, M.: Process, (accessed November 2011)
  16. 16.
    La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J., Gottschalk, F.: Beyond Control-Flow: Extending Business Process Configuration to Roles and Objects. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 199–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    La Rosa, M., Lux, J., Seidel, S., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Questionnaire-driven Configuration of Reference Process Models. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 424–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schnieders, A., Puhlmann, F.: Variability Mechanisms in E-Business Process Families. In: Abramowicz, W., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) Proc. of. 9th Int. Conf. on Business Information Systems. LNI, vol. 85, pp. 583–601. GI (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Statistics Sweden. The future population of Sweden (2009), (accessed July 15 2010)
  20. 20.
    Vogelaar, J., Verbeek, H.M.W., Luka, B., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Comparing Business Processes to Determine the Feasibility of Configurable Models: A Case Study, pp. 50–61 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl-Mikael Lönn
    • 1
  • Elin Uppström
    • 1
  • Petia Wohed
    • 1
  • Gustaf Juell-Skielse
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations