Skip to main content

Optimization of Criminal HotSpots Based on Underlying Crime Controlling Factors Using Geospatial Discriminative Pattern

  • Conference paper
Advanced Research in Applied Artificial Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2012)

Abstract

Criminal activities are unevenly distributed over space. The concept of hotspots is widely used to analyze the spatial characters of crimes. But existing methods usually identify hotspots based on an arbitrary user-defined threshold with respect to the number of a target crime without considering underlying controlling factors. In this study we introduce a new data mining model – Hotspots Optimization Tool (HOT) – to identify and optimize crime hotspots. The key component of HOT, Geospatial Discriminative Patterns (GDPatterns), which capture the difference between two classes in spatial dataset, is used in crime hotspot analysis. Using a real world dataset of a northeastern city in the United States, we demonstrate that the HOT model is a useful tool in optimizing crime hotspots,and it is also capable of visualizing criminal controlling factors which will help domain scientists further understanding the underlying reasons of criminal activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, T.C., Gatrell, A.C.: Interactive spatial data analysis. Longman Scientific & Technical Essex (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bates, S.: Spatial and temporal analysis of crime. Research Bulletin (April 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chainey, S., Ratcliffe, J.: GIS and crime mapping, vol. 6. John Wiley & Sons Inc. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chainey, S., Tompson, L., Uhlig, S.: The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Security Journal 21(1), 4–28 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, L.E., Felson, M.: Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 588–608 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cook, W., Ormerod, P., Cooper, E.: Scaling behaviour in the number of criminal acts committed by individuals. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2004, 07003 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ding, W., Stepinski, T.F., Salazar, J.: Discovery of geospatial discriminating patterns from remote sensing datasets. In: Proceedings of SIAM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dong, G., Li, J.: Efficient mining of emerging patterns: Discovering trends and differences. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGKDD, pp. 43–52. ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eck, J.E., Chainey, S., Cameron, J.G., Leitner, M., Wilson, R.E.: Mapping crime: Understanding hot spots (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gladwell, M.: The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Little, Brown and Company (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Harries, K.D.: Mapping crime: Principle and practice. US Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Crime Mapping Research Center (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hirschfield, A.: Mapping and Analysing Crime Data: Lessons from research and practice. CRC (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jenks, G.F.: The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography 7, 186–190 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Li, J., Liu, G., Wong, L.: Mining statistically important equivalence classes and delta-discriminative emerging patterns. In: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD, pp. 430–439. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pasquier, N., Bastide, Y., Taouil, R., Lakhal, L.: Discovering Frequent Closed Itemsets for Association Rules. In: Beeri, C., Bruneman, P. (eds.) ICDT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1540, pp. 398–416. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Short, M.B., Bertozzi, A.L., Brantingham, P.J.: Nonlinear patterns in urban crime: Hotspots, bifurcations, and suppression. Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems 9, 462 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Skogan, W.G.: Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. Univ. of California Pr. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wand, M.P., Jones, M.C.: Kernel smoothing, vol. 60. Chapman & Hall/CRC (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, D., Ding, W., Stepinski, T., Salazar, J., Lo, H., Morabito, M. (2012). Optimization of Criminal HotSpots Based on Underlying Crime Controlling Factors Using Geospatial Discriminative Pattern. In: Jiang, H., Ding, W., Ali, M., Wu, X. (eds) Advanced Research in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7345. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31087-4_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31087-4_57

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31086-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31087-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics