Common Sensorimotor Representation for Self-initiated Imitation Learning

  • Yasser Mohammad
  • Yoshimasa Ohmoto
  • Toyoaki Nishida
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7345)

Abstract

Internal representation is an important design decision in any imitation learning system. Actions and perceptual spaces were separate in classical AI due to the standard sense-process-act loop. Recently another representation that combines the two spaces into what we call a common sensorimotor space was inspired by the discovery of mirror neurons in animals and humans. The justification of this move is usually biological plausibility. This paper reports on a series of experiments comparing these two alternatives for self-initiated imitation tasks. The results of these experiments show that using a common sensorimotor representation allows the system to achieve higher accuracy and sensitivity. This is shown to be true (for our scenarios) even when the dimensionality of the common sensorimotor representation is higher than the dimensionality of the separate perceptual space. It also allows for an easier behavior generation mechanism and ensures reproducibility of learned behavior by the learner.

Keywords

Action Space Mirror Neuron Central Pattern Generator Motif Discovery Perceptual Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ajallooeian, M., Ahmadabadi, M.N., Araabi, B.N., Moradi, H.: An Imitation Model based on Central Pattern Generator with application in Robotic Marionette Behavior Learning. In: IEEE IROS, pp. 4199–4205 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alippi, C., Roveri, M.: An adaptive CUSUM-based test for signal change detection. In: 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, p. 4 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alissandrakis, A., Nehaniv, C.L., Dautenhahn, K.: Correspondence Mapping Induced State and Action Metrics for Robotic Imitation. Cybernetics 36(3), 1–9 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antonelo, E.A., Schrauwen, B., Stroobandt, D.: Imitation Learning of an Intelligent Navigation System for Mobile Robots using Reservoir Computing. In: 10th Barazelian Symposium on Neural Networks, pp. 93–98 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brooks, R.A.: Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47, 139–159 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dufay, B., Latombe, J.C.: An approach to automatic robot programming based on inductive learning. International Journal of Robotics Research 3(4), 3–20 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iacoboni, M.: Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology 60, 653–670 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohammad, Y., Nishida, T.: Constrained motif discovery in time series. New Generation Computing 27(4), 319–346 (2009)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohammad, Y., Nishida, T.: Robust Singular Spectrum Transform. In: Chien, B.-C., Hong, T.-P., Chen, S.-M., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5579, pp. 123–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mohammad, Y., Nishida, T.: On comparing SSA-based change point discovery algorithms. In: IEEE/SICE SII 2011, pp. 938–945 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohammad, Y., Nishida, T.: Fluid imitation: Learning from unplanned demonstrations. International Journal of Social Robotics (in press, 2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moskvina, V., Zhigljavsky, A.: An algorithm based on singular spectrum analysis for change-point detection. Communications in Statistics.Simulation and Computation 32(4), 319–352 (2003)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nagai, Y., Rohlfing, K.J.: Can Motionese Tell Infants and Robots. What to imitate? In: 4th Inter. Symp. on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts, pp. 299–306 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spong, M.W., Hutchinson, S., Vidyasagar, M.: Robot Modeling and Control. Wiley (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasser Mohammad
    • 1
  • Yoshimasa Ohmoto
    • 2
  • Toyoaki Nishida
    • 2
  1. 1.Assiut UniversityEgypt
  2. 2.Kyoto UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations