Abstract
Within the information systems (IS) discipline conceptual models have gained tremendous importance in the past years. Different approaches for systematic model quality evaluation have emerged. However, these approaches are based on different understandings, definitions as well as operationalizations of the term “model quality”. In this article we refrain from conceptualizing and operationalizing model quality a priori. In contrast, assuming that the determination of model quality and appropriate criteria are negotiated in a discourse between modelers and model users based on their different perspectives, we develop a methodical framework for the critical reconstruction and evaluation of conceptual model quality discourses in order to identify relevant model quality criteria and understandings. Our method is exemplarily applied for the reconstruction of the discourse on the quality criterion model understandability based on relevant laboratory experiments. This application shows that many research results on model understandability are hardly comparable due to their different basic assumptions and should preferably be interpreted based on a methodical reconstruction of underlying understandings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Fettke, P.: How Conceptual Modeling Is Used. Communications of the AIS 25, 571–592 (2009)
Germonprez, M., Hovorka, D., Gal, U.: Secondary Design: A Case of Behavioral Design Science Research. Journal of the AIS 12, 662–683 (2011)
Moody, D.L.: Theoretical and practical issues in evaluating the quality of conceptual models: current state and future directions. Data & Knowledge Eng 55, 243–276 (2005)
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28, 75–105 (2004)
Frank, U.: Towards a Pluralistic Conception of Research Methods in Information Systems Research. Institut für Informatik und Wirtschaftsinformatik (ICB) der Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen (2006)
Garvin, D.A.: What Does Product Quality Really Mean. Sloan Management Review 26, 25 (1984)
Moody, D.L.: Metrics for Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models. In: Ling, T.-W., Ram, S., Li Lee, M. (eds.) ER 1998. LNCS, vol. 1507, pp. 211–225. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Krogstie, J., Sindre, G., Jørgensen, H.: Process Models as Knowledge for Action: A Revised Quality Framework. European Journal of Information Systems 15, 91–102 (2006)
Frank, U.: Evaluation of Reference Models. In: Fettke, P., Loos, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, pp. 118–140. Idea Group, Hershey (2007)
Becker, J., Rosemann, M., von Uthmann, C.: Guidelines of Business Process Modeling. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 30–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Janiesch, C., Brelage, C., Holten, R.: Exploration of Conceptual Models - Application of the GoM Framework. In: Information Resources Management Association International Conference (IRMA), San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 254–257 (2005)
Ortner, E., Schienmann, B.: Normative Language Approach - A Framework for Understanding. In: Thalheim, B. (ed.) ER 1996. LNCS, vol. 1157, pp. 261–276. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Moody, D.L.: Validation of a Method for Representing Large Entity Relationship Models: An Action Research Study. In: Wrycza, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2002), Gdansk, Poland, pp. 391–405 (2002)
Moody, D.L., Shanks, G.G.: Improving the Quality of Data Models: Empirical Validation of a Quality Management Framework. Information Systems 28, 619–650 (2003)
Sedera, W., Rosemann, M., Gable, G.: Measuring Process Modelling Success. In: Wrycza, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2002), Gdansk, Poland, pp. 331–341 (2002)
Schütte, R.: Evaluation of information models (in German). In: Heinrich, L.J., Häntschel, I. (eds.) Evaluation und Evaluationsforschung in der Wirtschaftsinformatik - Handbuch für Praxis, Lehre und Forschung, Oldenbourg, München, Wien, pp. 307–382 (2000)
Blommaert, J.: Discourse: a Critical Introduction. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambr. (2005)
Potter, J., Wetherell, M.: Discourse and Social Psychology. Sage, London (2011)
Harris, Z., Mattick Jr., P.: Science Sublanguages and the Prospects for a Global Language of Science. Annals of the American Academy of Pol. and Social Science 495, 73–83 (1988)
Halpin, T.: Fact-Oriented Modeling: Past, Present and Future. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Brinkkemper, S. (eds.) Conceptual Modelling in Information Systems Engineering, pp. 19–38. Springer, New York (2007)
Sindre, G., Opdahl, A.L.: Capturing Dependability Threats in Conceptual Modeling. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Brinkkemper, S. (eds.) Conceptual Modelling in Information Systems Engineering, pp. 247–260. Springer, New York (2007)
Auramäki, E., Hirschheim, R., Lyytinen, K.: Modelling Offices Through Discourse Analysis: A Comparison and Evaluation of SAMPO with OSSAD and ICN. The Computer Journal 35, 492–500 (1991)
Auramäki, E., Hirschheim, R., Lyytinen, K.: Modelling Offices Through Discourse Analysis: The SAMPO Approach. The Computer Journal 35, 342–352 (1991)
Cimiano, P., Reyle, U., Sanic, J.: Ontology-driven discourse analysis for information extraction. Data & Knowl. Eng. 55, 59–83 (2005)
Ulrich, W.: Critically Systemic Discourse - A Discursive Approach to Reflective Practice in ISD (Part 2). The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA) 3, 85–106 (2001)
Ulrich, W.: Philosophical Staircase for Information Systems Definition, Design, and Development - A Discoursive Approach to Reflective Practice in ISD (Part 1). The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA) 3, 55–84 (2001)
Winograd, T.: A Language/Action Perspective on the Design of Cooperative Work. Human-Computer Interaction 3, 3–30 (1987-1988)
Hoppenbrouwers, S., Proper, H., van der Weide, T.: Formal Modelling as a Grounded Conversation. In: Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., Haraldson, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Working Conference on the Language Action Perspective on Communication Modelling (LAP 2005), Kiruna, Sweden, pp. 139–155 (2005)
Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V.: Research Synthesis As a Scientific Enterprise. In: Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V. (eds.) The Handbook of Research Synthesis, pp. 3–14. Sage, New York (1994)
Agarwal, R., De, P., Sinha, A.P.: Comprehending Object and Process Models: An Empirical Study. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 25, 541–556 (1999)
Bodart, F., Patel, A., Sim, M., Weber, R.: Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modelling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests. Information Systems Research 12, 384–405 (2001)
Burton-Jones, A., Weber, R.: Understanding Relationships with Attributes in Entity-Relationship Diagrams. In: De, P., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 1999), pp. 214–228. Charlotte, North Carolina (1999)
Burton-Jones, A., Meso, P.N.: Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis. Information System Research 17, 38–60 (2006)
Burton-Jones, A., Meso, P.N.: The Effects of Decomposition Quality and Multiple Forms of Information on Novices’ Understanding of a Domain from a Conceptual Model. Journal of the AIS 9, 748–802 (2008)
Juhn, S., Naumann, J.: The Effectiveness of Data Representation Characteristics on User Validation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 1985), pp. 212–226 (1985)
Palvia, T., Lio, C., To, P.: The Impact of Conceptual Data Models on End User Performance. J. Database Manage. 3, 4–14 (1992)
Kim, Y.-G., March, S.T.: Comparing Data Modelling Formalisms. Communications of the ACM 38, 103–115 (1995)
Nordbotten, J.C., Crosby, M.E.: The Effect of Graphic Style on Data Model Interpretation. Information Systems Journal 9, 139–155 (1999)
Moody, D.L.: Complexity Effects on End User Understanding of Data Models: An Experimental Comparison of Large Data Model Representation Methods. In: Wrycza, S. (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2002), Gdansk, Poland, pp. 482–496 (2002)
Moody, D.L.: Cognitive Load Effects on End User Understanding of Conceptual Models: An Experimental Analysis. In: Benczúr, A.A., Demetrovics, J., Gottlob, G. (eds.) ADBIS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3255, pp. 129–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Serrano, M., Calero, C., Trujillo, J., Lujan, S., Piattini, M.: Empirical Validation of Metrics for Conceptual Models of Data Warehouses. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 506–520. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Gemino, A., Wand, Y.: Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties. Data & Knowledge Eng. 55, 301–326 (2005)
Sarshar, K., Loos, P.: Comparing the Control-Flow of EPC and Petri Net from the End-User Perspective. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Curbera, F. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3649, pp. 434–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Poels, G., Gailly, F., Maes, A., Paemeleire, R.: Object Class or Association Class? Testing the User Effect on Cardinality Interpretation. In: Akoka, J., Liddle, S.W., Song, I.-Y., Bertolotto, M., Comyn-Wattiau, I., van den Heuvel, W.-J., Kolp, M., Trujillo, J., Kop, C., Mayr, H.C. (eds.) ER Workshops 2005. LNCS, vol. 3770, pp. 33–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Khatri, V., Vessey, I., Ramesh, V., Clay, P., Park, S.-J.: Understanding conceptual schemas: Exploring the role of application and IS domain knowledge. Information Systems Research 17, 81–99 (2006)
Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Cardoso, J.: What Makes Process Models Understandable? In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Recker, J., Dreiling, A.: Does it matter which process modelling language we teach or use? An experimental study on understanding process modelling languages without formal education. In: Toleman, M., Cater-Steel, A., Roberts, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Conference on Inf. Systems, Toowoomba, Australia, pp. 356–366 (2007)
Serrano, M., Trujillo, J., Calero, C., Piattini, M.: Metrics for data warehouse conceptual models understandability. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49, 851–870 (2007)
De Lucia, A., Gravino, C., Oliveto, R., Tortora, G.: Data model comprehension an empirical comparison of ER and UML class diagrams. In: IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, Amsterdam, pp. 93–102 (2008)
Genero, M., Poels, G., Piattini, M.: Defining and validating metrics for assessing the understandability of entity-relationship diagrams. Data & Knowl. Eng. 64, 534–557 (2008)
Mendling, J., Strembeck, M.: Influence Factors of Understanding Business Process Models. In: Abramowicz, W., Fensel, D. (eds.) Business Information Systems. LNBIP, vol. 7, pp. 142–153. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J.: Modularity in Process Models: Review and Effects. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 20–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Cardoso, J.: On a Quest for Good Process Models: The Cross-Connectivity Metric. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 480–494. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Recker, J., Dreiling, A.: The Effects of Content Presentation Format and User Characteristics on Novice Developers Understanding of Process Models. Communications of the AIS 28, 65–84 (2011)
Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J.: A Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans 41, 449–462 (2011)
Schalles, C., Creagh, J., Rebstock, M.: Usability of Modelling Languages for Model Inter-pretation: An Empirical Research Report. In: Bernstein, A., Schwabe, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 787–796 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fettke, P., Houy, C., Vella, AL., Loos, P. (2012). Towards the Reconstruction and Evaluation of Conceptual Model Quality Discourses – Methodical Framework and Application in the Context of Model Understandability. In: Bider, I., et al. Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. BPMDS EMMSAD 2012 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 113. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31072-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31072-0_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31071-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31072-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)