A Proposal of an Event Ontology for Urban Crowd Profiling

  • Mizar Luca Federici
  • Andrea Gorrini
  • Lorenza Manenti
  • Fabio Sartori
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 112)

Abstract

The definitions of ‘‘event’’ and ‘‘crowd’’ are still representing controversial issues that have been tackled by different disciplines like Sociology, Philosophy and Computer Science. The proposed ontology of events takes advantage of results and perspectives already present in literature and in available resources, like DBpedia. Events, such as celebrations, concerts, sport matches and so on, are, in this work, defined as structured entities spatially and temporally confined, codified by a specific script, and participated by urban crowds. The integration of an ontology of ‘‘event’’ with an ontology of ‘‘crowd’’ constitutes the originality of this work. A conceptual framework has been defined, and then implemented in Protègè, to create a versatile tool to profile crowds. In the paper the assumptions that underline the development of the ontology are introduced, then its implementation in Protègè and its application to a case study is presented.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Casati, R., Varzi, A.: Fifty years of events: An annotated bibliography 1947 to 1997. Philosophy Documentation Center, Bowling Green, OH (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mühl, G., Fiege, L., Pietzuch, P.R.: Distributed event-based systems. Springer (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaneiwa, K., Iwazume, M., Fukuda, K.: An Upper Ontology for Event Classifications and Relations. In: Orgun, M.A., Thornton, J. (eds.) AI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4830, pp. 394–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Allen, J.F., Ferguson, G.: Actions and events in interval temporal logic. J. Log. Comput. 4(5), 531–579 (1994)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical and computational foundations. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Niles, I., Pease, A.: Towards a standard upper ontology. In: FOIS, pp. 2–9 (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krantz, M., Schätzl, L.: Marketing the city. European Cities in Competition, 468–491 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Bon, G.: The crowd (1895). Viking, New York (1960)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reicher, S.: Crowd behaviour as social action. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory, 171–202 (1987)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Challenger, R., Clegg, C., Robinson, M.: Understanding Crowd Behaviours, vol. 1. Cabinet Office (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Canetti, E., Stewart, C.: Crowds and power. Farrar, Straus and Giroux (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schank, R., Abelson, R., University, Y.: Scripts, plans, and knowledge. Yale University (1975)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bandini, S., Manenti, L., Manzoni, S., Sartori, F.: A knowledge-based approach to crowd classification. In: Peacock, R.D., Kuligowski, E.D., Averill, J.D. (eds.) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, pp. 515–525. Springer, US (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mizar Luca Federici
    • 1
  • Andrea Gorrini
    • 2
  • Lorenza Manenti
    • 3
  • Fabio Sartori
    • 3
  1. 1.CROWDYXITY s.r.l. - Crowd Dynamics and ComplexityMilanoItaly
  2. 2.INFORMATION SOCIETY Ph.D. ProgramUniversity of Milan-BicoccaMilanoItaly
  3. 3.CSAI - Complex Systems and Artificial Intelligence Research CenterUniversity of Milan - BicoccaMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations