Advertisement

Robotic Fish to Lead the School

  • C. Rossi
  • W. Coral
  • A. Barrientos
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the possibility of using robotics technology in order to aid fish farming. The main idea is to use biomimetic robots that can lead the school and control its swimming behavior. Such approach has several advantages over other technological means, and poses interesting challenges, both as far as robotics technology and fish biology is concerned. In this chapter, such technological challenges are discussed.

Keywords

Artificial Agent Live Fish Robotic Technology Schooling Behavior Artificial Fish 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aureli M, Porfiri M (2010) Coordination of self-propelled particles through external leadership, EPL (Europhysics Letters) vol 92, Nov 4, 2010Google Scholar
  2. Aureli M, Kopman V, Porfiri M (2010a) Free-locomotion of underwater vehicles actuated by ionic polymer metal composites. In: IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics, vol 15(4), pp 603–6013Google Scholar
  3. Aureli M, Fiorilli F, Porfiri M (2010b) Interactions between fish and robots: an experimental study. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2010 dynamic systems and control conference, paper no. DSCC2010-4098, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bone Q, Moore RH (2008) Biology of fishes. Taylor & Francis, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bumann D, Krause J (1993) Front individuals lead in shoals of 3-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) and juvenile roach (Rutilus rutilus), Behaviour, vol 125(3/4), pp 189–198Google Scholar
  6. Chen Z, Shatara S, Tan X (2010) Modeling of biomimetic robotic fish propelled by an ionic polymer metal composite caudal fin. In: IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol 15, pp 448–459Google Scholar
  7. Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1989) Collective patterns and decision-making. Ethol Ecol Evol 1:295–311Google Scholar
  8. Dyer JRG, Croft DP, Morrell LJ, Krause J (2009) Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy. Behav Ecol 20:165–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faria JJ, Dyer JRG, Clément RO, Couzin RO, Holt N, Ward AJW, Waters D, Krause J (2010) A novel method for investigating the collective behaviour of fish: introducing ‘Robofish’. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1211–1218Google Scholar
  10. Gray J (1933) Studies in animal locomotion. J Exp Biol 10:88–104Google Scholar
  11. Hensor EMA, Godin J-GJ, Hoare DJ-JK (2004) Effects of nutritional state on the shoaling tendency of banded killifish, Fundulus diaphanus, in the field. Anim Behav 65:663–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jung J, Kim B, Kim D, Park J (2005) A biomimetic undulatory tadpole robot using ionic polymer metal composite actuators. Smart Mater Struct 14:1579–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lighthill MJ (1960) Note on the swimming of slender fish. J Fluid Mech 9:305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu J, Hu H (2007) Methodology of modelling fish-like swim patterns for robotic fish. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, Harbin, China, pp 1316–1321Google Scholar
  15. Liu J, Hu H (2010) Biological inspiration: from carangiform fish to multi-joint robotic fish. J Bionic Eng 7(1):35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ming A, Park S, Nagata Y, Shimojo M (2009) Development of underwater robots using piezoelectric fiber composite. In IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Kobe, Japan, pp 3821–3826Google Scholar
  17. Nguyen QS, Heo S, Park HC, Goo NS, Kang T, Yoon KJ, Lee SS (2009) A fish robot driven by piezoceramic actuators and a miniaturized power supply. Int J Control Autom Syst 7(2):267–272Google Scholar
  18. Ono N, Kusaka M, Taya M, Wang C (2004) Design of fish fin actuators using shape memory alloy composites. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol 5388, pp 305–312Google Scholar
  19. Parrish JK, Viscido SV, Ggünbaum D (2002) Self-organized fish schools: an examination of emergent properties. Biol Bull 202:296–305Google Scholar
  20. Rediniotis OK, Wilson LN, Lagoudas DC, Khan MM (2002) Development of a shape-memory-alloy actuated biomimetic hydrofoil. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 13(1):35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reebs SG (2001) Influence of body size on leadership in shoals of golden shiners, notemigonus crysoleucas. Behaviour, 138(7):797–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robinson CJ, Pitcher TJ (1989) The influence of hunger and ration level on shoal density, polarization and swimming speed of herring, Clupea harengus L. J Fish Biol 34:631–633Google Scholar
  23. Rossi C, Coral W, Barrientos A, Colorado J (2010) Fish physiology put into practice: a robotic fish model. In: Workshop on the swimming physiology of fish (FitFish 2010), Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  24. Rossi C, Colorado J, Coral W, Barrientos A (2011) Bending continuous structures with SMAs: a novel robotic fish design. Bioinspir Biomim 6:045005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shahinpoor M (1992) Conceptual design, kinematics and dynamics of swimming robotic structures using ionic polymeric gel muscles. Smart Mater Struct 1(1):91–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shahinpoor M, Kim KJ (2004) Ionic polymer-metal composites: III. Modeling and simulation as biomimetic sensors, actuators, transducers and artificial muscles. Smart Mater Struct 13:1362–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shames I, Yu J, Fidan B, Anderson BDO (2007) Externally excited coordination of autonomous formations. In: Mediterranean conference on control and automation, Athens, Greece, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  28. Suleman Afzal, Crawford Curran (2008) Design and testing of a biomimetic tuna using shape memory alloy induced propulsion. Comput Struct 86:491–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Valdivia y Alvarado P, Youcef-Toumi K (2006) Design of machines with compliant bodies for biomimetic locomotion in liquid environments. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 128:3–13Google Scholar
  30. Vaughan R, Sumpterm N, Henderson J, Frost A, Cameron S (2000) Experiments in automatic flock control. J Robot Auton Syst 31:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang Z, Hang G, Wang Y, Li J, Du W (2008) Embedded sma wire actuated biomimetic fin: a module for biomimetic underwater propulsion. Smart Mater Struct 17(2):25–39Google Scholar
  32. Zhang Y, Li S, Ma J, Yang J (2005) Development of an underwater oscillatory propulsion system using shape memory alloy. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation, Niagara Falls, Canada, pp 1878–1883Google Scholar
  33. Zio D, Tangorra J, Anquetil P, Fofonoff T, Chen A, Hunter I (2007) The application of conducting polymers to a biorobotic fin propulsor. J Bioinsp Biomim 2(2):S6–S17CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Automation and RoboticsUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid28006 MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations