Advertisement

Does a Hyperlink Function as an Endorsement?

  • Eric DiMuzio
  • S. Shyam Sundar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7284)

Abstract

Websites often provide hyperlinks to other sites featuring related content. Does this imply an endorsement of the content presented on those linked sites? We answered this question with a 2 x 2 between-subjects factorial experiment in which we systematically varied source credibility (high vs. low) and source sequence (linking vs. linked). All study participants (N = 572) read a dubious story questioning the value of sunscreen, with a link at the bottom to a related story with the same claim. Results show that user perceptions of interest value (i.e., appeal) do transfer over from the linking site to the linked site. However, the source signal is quite salient when it comes to evaluations of newsworthiness and trustworthiness, with users taking note of the differences in credibility. Design implications of these findings for persuasive communications are discussed.

Keywords

Hyperlink Link Source Endorsement Persuasion 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kang, H., Bae, K., Zhang, S., Sundar, S.S.: Source cues in online news: Is the proximate source more powerful than distal sources? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 88, 719–736 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kim, H.-S., Sundar, S.S.: Using interface cues in online health community boards to change impressions and encourage user contribution. In: Proc. CHI 2011, pp. 599–608. ACM Press (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Metzger, M.J.: Making sense of credibility on the web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. JASIST 58(13), 2078–2091 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J., Medders, R.B.: Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. J. Communication 40, 419–439 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newhagen, J., Nass, C.: Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly 66, 277–284 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rubin, R.B., Palmgreen, P., Sypher, H.E.: Communication research measures: a sourcebook. Guilford (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sundar, S.S., Nass, C.: Conceptualizing sources in online news. J. of Communication 51(1), 52–72 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sundar, S.S.: Exploring receivers’ criteria for perception of print and online news. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 76(2), 373–386 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sundar, S.S.: The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In: Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J. (eds.) Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, MIT Press (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric DiMuzio
    • 1
  • S. Shyam Sundar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Media Effects Research LaboratoryThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations