Biometric Monitoring as a Persuasive Technology: Ensuring Patients Visit Health Centers in India’s Slums

  • Nupur Bhatnagar
  • Abhishek Sinha
  • Navkar Samdaria
  • Aakar Gupta
  • Shelly Batra
  • Manish Bhardwaj
  • William Thies
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7284)


Managing chronic disease is particularly challenging in the developing world, because every trip to a health center can translate to lost time and wages on the part of the patient. This problem is especially acute for tuberculosis patients, who in India are required to visit a center over 40 times in the course of a six-month treatment period. In this paper, we explore the role of a biometric attendance terminal in persuading patients to complete follow-up health visits in slum communities of New Delhi, India. The terminal, which enrolled over 2,300 patients across 25 centers during our 2 years of observation, uses biometric fingerprint scanning to ensure that tuberculosis patients receive and take medications on the right schedule. We evaluate the perceived impact of the terminal via interviews with 8 health workers, 4 center owners, and 23 patients. Our findings suggest that the biometric terminal helps to draw patients to the center, both by incentivizing health workers to convince patients to come, and by persuading patients that in-person visits are important.


Health Worker Tuberculosis Patient Biometric System Average Household Income Persuasive Technology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Dell, N., Vaidyanathan, V., Medhi, I., Cutrell, E., Thies, W.: “Yours is Better!” Participant Response Bias in HCI. In: CHI (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farmer, T.: Factors influencing adherence to tuberculosis directly observed therapy: A review of the literature. Tech. rep., Toronto Public Health (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krueger, K., Ruby, D., Cooley, P., Montoya, B., Exarchos, A., Djojonegoro, B., Field, K.: Videophone utilization as an alternative to directly observed therapy for tuberculosis. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 14(6) (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    SonLa Study Group: Using a fingerprint recognition system in a vaccine trial to avoid misclassification. Bulletin of the WHO 85(1) (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization: Global Tuberculosis Control 2009: Epidemiology, Strategy, Financing (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McDonald, H.P., Garg, A.X., Haynes, R.B.: Interventions to enhance patient adherence to medication prescriptions. Journal of the American Medical Association 288(22) (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moulding, T.S., Caymittes, M.: Managing medication compliance of tuberculosis patients in haiti with medication monitors. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 6(4) (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nair, D.M., George, A., Chacko, K.T.: Tuberculosis in Bombay: New Insights from Poor Urban Patients. Health Policy and Planning 12(1) (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Osterberg, L., Blaschke, T.: Adherence to medication. New England Journal of Medicine 353 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paik, M., Samdaria, N., Gupta, A., Weber, J., Bhatnagar, N., Batra, S., Bhardwaj, M., Thies, W.: A Biometric Attendance Terminal and its Application to Health Programs in India. In: ACM Workshop on Networking and Systems for Developing Regions (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rao, M.: UID and Public Health: Specious Claims. eSS/Newsclick Policy Matters, Rao, UID health (February 2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Serwaa-Bonsu, A., Herbst, A.J., Reniers, G., Ijaa, W., Clark, B., Kabudula, C., Sankoh, O.: First experiences in the implementation of biometric technology to link data from health and demographic surveillance systems with health facility data. Global Health Action 3 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sterns, A.A., Mayhorn, C.B.: Persuasive Pillboxes: Improving Medication Adherence with Personal Digital Assistants. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 195–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    UID and Public Health. UIDAI Working Paper,
  15. 15.
    Weibel, D., Schelling, E., Bonfoh, B., Utzinger, J., Hattendorf, J., Abdoulaye, M., Madjiade, T., Zinsstag, J.: Demographic and health surveillance of mobile pastoralists in Chad: Integration of biometric fingerprint identification into a geographical information system. Geospatial Health 3(1) (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yu, K.L., Chen, C.C., Chang, W.S., Juma, H., Chang, C.S.: Fingerprint identification of AIDS patients on ART. Lancet 365 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nupur Bhatnagar
    • 1
  • Abhishek Sinha
    • 1
  • Navkar Samdaria
    • 2
  • Aakar Gupta
    • 2
  • Shelly Batra
    • 1
  • Manish Bhardwaj
    • 3
  • William Thies
    • 4
  1. 1.Operation ASHAIndia
  2. 2.University of TorontoCanada
  3. 3.Innovators In HealthIndia
  4. 4.Microsoft ResearchIndia

Personalised recommendations