Skip to main content

The Voluntariness of Persuasive Technology

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 7284)

Abstract

The most important ethical question regarding PTs is the voluntariness of changes they bring about. Coercive technologies control its users by application of direct force or credible threat. Manipulative technologies control their users by influencing them in ways of which the users are not aware and cannot control. As a result, both violate the voluntariness condition of the standard definition of PTs. Any voluntariness assessment needs to consider whether there are external controlling influences and whether the user acts intentionally.

Keywords

  • voluntary change
  • persuasive technology
  • coercion
  • manipulation
  • ethics of persuasive technology
  • controlling influences
  • intentional action

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, S.: Coercion. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/coercion/

  2. Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, trans. Ross, W.D., http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html (accessed from March 9, 2012)

  3. Bargh, J.A., Chartrand, T.L.: The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist 54(7), 462–479 (1999)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Berdichevsky, D., Neuenschwander, E.: Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Commun. ACM 42(5), 51–58 (1999)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Blumenthal-Barby, J.S.: On the Concept and Measure of Voluntariness: Insights from Behavioral Economics and Cognitive Science. The American Journal of Bioethics 11(8), 25–26 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Bovens, L.: The Ethics of Nudge. In: Grüne-Yanoff, T., Ove Hansson, S. (eds.) Preference Change, pp. 207–219. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Brenkert, G.G.: Marketing Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fogg, B.: Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary (Voluntary), http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/voluntary (accessed on December 23, 2011)

  10. Ham, J., Midden, C.: Ambient Persuasive Technology Needs Little Cognitive Effort: The Differential Effects of Cognitive Load on Lighting Feedback versus Factual Feedback. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 132–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E.: Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being: Setting the Scene. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 1–5. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaptein, M., Eckles, D.: Selecting Effective Means to Any End: Futures and Ethics of Persuasion Profiling. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 82–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Muraven, M., Baumeister, R.F.: Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin 126(2), 247–259 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Nelson, R.M., et al.: The Concept of Voluntary Consent. The American Journal of Bioethics 11(8), 6–16 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Nickel, P.J.: The Definition of Persuasive Technology (manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nickel, P.J., Spahn, A.: Design for Symmetry - Trust, Discourse Ethics, and Persuasive Technology (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Behavior Change Support Systems: A Research Model and Agenda. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 4–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruijten, P., Midden, C., Ham, J.: Unconscious Persuasion Needs Goal Striving. The Effect of Goal Activation on the Persuasive Power of Subliminal Feedback. Paper presented at Persuasive 2011, Columbus, OH, USA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spahn, A.: And Lead Us (Not) into Persuasion…? Persuasive Technology and the Ethics of Communication. Science and Engineering Ethics (Published online first May 5, 2011), doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9278-y

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Smids, J. (2012). The Voluntariness of Persuasive Technology. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds) Persuasive Technology. Design for Health and Safety. PERSUASIVE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31036-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31037-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)