Abstract
The most important ethical question regarding PTs is the voluntariness of changes they bring about. Coercive technologies control its users by application of direct force or credible threat. Manipulative technologies control their users by influencing them in ways of which the users are not aware and cannot control. As a result, both violate the voluntariness condition of the standard definition of PTs. Any voluntariness assessment needs to consider whether there are external controlling influences and whether the user acts intentionally.
Keywords
- voluntary change
- persuasive technology
- coercion
- manipulation
- ethics of persuasive technology
- controlling influences
- intentional action
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, S.: Coercion. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2011), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/coercion/
Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics, trans. Ross, W.D., http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.html (accessed from March 9, 2012)
Bargh, J.A., Chartrand, T.L.: The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist 54(7), 462–479 (1999)
Berdichevsky, D., Neuenschwander, E.: Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Commun. ACM 42(5), 51–58 (1999)
Blumenthal-Barby, J.S.: On the Concept and Measure of Voluntariness: Insights from Behavioral Economics and Cognitive Science. The American Journal of Bioethics 11(8), 25–26 (2011)
Bovens, L.: The Ethics of Nudge. In: Grüne-Yanoff, T., Ove Hansson, S. (eds.) Preference Change, pp. 207–219. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht (2009)
Brenkert, G.G.: Marketing Ethics. Wiley-Blackwell (2008)
Fogg, B.: Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Amsterdam (2003)
Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary (Voluntary), http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/voluntary (accessed on December 23, 2011)
Ham, J., Midden, C.: Ambient Persuasive Technology Needs Little Cognitive Effort: The Differential Effects of Cognitive Load on Lighting Feedback versus Factual Feedback. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 132–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E.: Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being: Setting the Scene. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 1–5. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Kaptein, M., Eckles, D.: Selecting Effective Means to Any End: Futures and Ethics of Persuasion Profiling. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 82–93. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Muraven, M., Baumeister, R.F.: Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin 126(2), 247–259 (2000)
Nelson, R.M., et al.: The Concept of Voluntary Consent. The American Journal of Bioethics 11(8), 6–16 (2011)
Nickel, P.J.: The Definition of Persuasive Technology (manuscript)
Nickel, P.J., Spahn, A.: Design for Symmetry - Trust, Discourse Ethics, and Persuasive Technology (submitted)
Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Behavior Change Support Systems: A Research Model and Agenda. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 4–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Ruijten, P., Midden, C., Ham, J.: Unconscious Persuasion Needs Goal Striving. The Effect of Goal Activation on the Persuasive Power of Subliminal Feedback. Paper presented at Persuasive 2011, Columbus, OH, USA (2011)
Spahn, A.: And Lead Us (Not) into Persuasion…? Persuasive Technology and the Ethics of Communication. Science and Engineering Ethics (Published online first May 5, 2011), doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9278-y
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Smids, J. (2012). The Voluntariness of Persuasive Technology. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds) Persuasive Technology. Design for Health and Safety. PERSUASIVE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31036-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31037-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
