Advertisement

Benign and Malignant EndometriumOpen image in new window

  • Jean Noel Buy
  • Michel Ghossain
Chapter

Abstract

Glands are lined by a single layer of flattened or cuboidal epithelial cells containing bland nuclei without mitoses. Mucus is scant. Glands may be fragmented.

Keywords

Endometrial Carcinoma Myometrial Invasion Endometrial Polyp Normal Endometrium Contrast Uptake 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Smith-Bindman R et al (1998) Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude ­endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA 280(17):1510–1517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choo YC et al (1985) Postmenopausal uterine bleeding of nonorganic cause. Obstet Gynecol 66(2):225–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lidor A et al (1986) Histopathological findings in 226 women with post-menopausal uterine bleeding. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 65(1):41–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sherman ME (2002) Benign diseases of the endometrium. In: Kurman RJ (ed) Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. Springer, New York, pp 421–466Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Atri M et al (1994) Transvaginal US appearance of endometrial ­abnormalities. Radiographics 14:483–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baldwin MT et al (1999) Focal intracavitary masses recognized with the hyperechoic line sign at endovaginal US and characterized with ­hysterosonography. Radiographics 19(4):927–935PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    La Torre R et al (1999) Transvaginal sonographic evaluation of endometrial polyps: a comparison with two dimensional and three dimensional contrast sonography. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 26(3–4):171–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldstein SR et al (2002) Evaluation of endometrial polyps. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186(4):669–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jorizzo JR, Chen MY, Riccio GJ (2001) Endometrial polyps: sonohysterographic evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(3):617–621PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grasel RP et al (2000) Endometrial polyps: MR imaging features and ­distinction from endometrial carcinoma. Radiology 214(1):47–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park BK et al (2006) Differentiation of the various lesions causing an abnormality of the endometrial cavity using MR imaging: emphasis on enhancement patterns on dynamic studies and late contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Eur Radiol 16(7):1591–1598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mittal KR et al (1995) Coexistent atypical polypoid adenomyoma and endometrial adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol 26(5):574–576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazur MT (1981) Atypical polypoid adenomyomas of the endometrium. Am J Surg Pathol 5(5):473–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Longacre TA et al (1996) Atypical polypoid adenomyofibromas (atypical polypoid adenomyomas) of the uterus. A clinicopathologic study of 55 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 20(1):1–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maeda T et al (2006) Atypical polypoid adenomyoma of the uterus: appearance on (18)F-FDG PET/MRI fused images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(2):320–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ronnett BM, Kurman MD (2002) Precursor lesions of endometrial ­carcinoma. In: Kurman RJ (ed) Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chaudhry S et al (2003) Benign and malignant diseases of the endometrium. Top Magn Reson Imaging 14(4):339–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hendrickson MR, Kempson RL (1980) Endometrial epithelial metaplasias: proliferations frequently misdiagnosed as adenocarcinoma. Report of 89 cases and proposed classification. Am J Surg Pathol 4(6):525–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamashita Y et al (1993) Assessment of myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: transvaginal sonography vs contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 161(3):595–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fleischer AC et al (1987) Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: sonographic assessment. Radiology 162(2):307–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alcazar JL et al (2009) Assessing myometrial infiltration by endometrial cancer: uterine virtual navigation with three-dimensional US. Radiology 250(3):776–783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tamai K et al (2007) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of uterine endometrial cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(3):682–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fujii S et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating benign from malignant uterine endometrial cavity lesions: initial results. Eur Radiol 18(2):384–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Manfredi R et al (2005) Endometrial cancer: magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 30(5):626–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Joja I et al (1996) Endometrial carcinoma: dynamic MRI with turbo-FLASH technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20(6):878–887PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Manfredi R et al (2004) Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology 231(2):372–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Takeuchi M et al (2005) Pathologies of the uterine endometrial cavity: usual and unusual manifestations and pitfalls on magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 15(11):2244–2255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sala E et al (2007) MRI of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus and cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(6):1577–1587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shen SH et al (2008) Diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging with parallel technique in assessment of endometrial cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(2):481–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pecorelli S (2009) Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, ­cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105(2):103–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ronnett BM et al (2002) Endometrial carcinoma. In: Kurman RJ (ed) Blaustein’s pathology of the female genital tract. Springer, New York, pp 501–559Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Seki H, Kimura M, Sakai K (1997) Myometrial invasion of endometrial carcinoma: assessment with dynamic MR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Clin Radiol 52(1):18–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ito K et al (1994) Assessing myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma with dynamic MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18(1):77–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lin G et al (2009) Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging – initial experience. Radiology 250(3):784–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koyama T, Tamai K, Togashi K (2007) Staging of carcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium. Eur Radiol 17(8):2009–2019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Larson DM et al (1996) Prognostic significance of gross myometrial ­invasion with endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 88(3):394–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nakao Y et al (2006) MR imaging in endometrial carcinoma as a diagnostic tool for the absence of myometrial invasion. Gynecol Oncol 102(2):343–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lee EJ et al (1999) Staging of early endometrial carcinoma: assessment with T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiographics 19(4):937–945; discussion 946–947PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Scoutt LM et al (1995) Clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma: pitfalls in preoperative assessment with MR imaging. Work in progress. Radiology 194(2):567–572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Utsunomiya D et al (2004) Endometrial carcinoma in adenomyosis: assessment of myometrial invasion on T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182(2):399–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fanning J et al (1991) Prognostic significance of the extent of cervical involvement by endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 40(1):46–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boente MP et al (1993) Prognostic factors and long-term survival in endometrial adenocarcinoma with cervical involvement. Gynecol Oncol 51(3):316–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lampe B et al (1997) Accuracy of preoperative histology and macroscopic assessment of cervical involvement in endometrial carcinoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 74(2):205–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rutledge F (1974) The role of radical hysterectomy in adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol 2(2–3):331–347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rubin SC et al (1992) Management of endometrial adenocarcinoma with cervical involvement. Gynecol Oncol 45(3):294–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Elia G et al (1995) Surgical management of patients with endometrial cancer and cervical involvement. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 16(3):169–173PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bigelow B, Vekshtein V, Demopoulos RI (1983) Endometrial carcinoma, stage II: route and extent of spread to the cervix. Obstet Gynecol 62(3):363–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Belloni C et al (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging in endometrial carcinoma staging. Gynecol Oncol 37(2):172–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chen SS, Rumancik WM, Spiegel G (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging in stage I endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 75(2):274–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Murakami T et al (1995) Cervical invasion of endometrial carcinoma – evaluation by parasagittal MR imaging. Acta Radiol 36(3):248–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Takahashi S et al (1998) Preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma: diagnostic effect of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 206(2):539–547PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Seki H, Takano T, Sakai K (2000) Value of dynamic MR imaging in assessing endometrial carcinoma involvement of the cervix. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(1):171–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tsili AC et al (2008) Local staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of ­multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 18(5):1043–1048PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Walsh JW, Goplerud DR (1982) Computed tomography of primary, persistent, and recurrent endometrial malignancy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 139(6):1149–1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Neven P (1993) Tamoxifen and endometrial lesions. Lancet 342(8869):452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    McGonigle KF et al (1998) Abnormalities detected on transvaginal ultrasonography in tamoxifen-treated postmenopausal breast cancer patients may represent endometrial cystic atrophy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178(6):1145–1150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Goldstein SR (1994) Unusual ultrasonographic appearance of the uterus in patients receiving tamoxifen. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(2):447–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Achiron R et al (1995) Sonohysterography for ultrasonographic evaluation of tamoxifen-associated cystic thickened endometrium. J Ultrasound Med 14(9):685–688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    van Leeuwen FE et al (1994) Risk of endometrial cancer after tamoxifen treatment of breast cancer. Lancet 343(8895):448–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lahti E et al (1993) Endometrial changes in postmenopausal breast cancer patients receiving tamoxifen. Obstet Gynecol 81(5 (Pt 1)):660–664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cheng WF et al (1997) Comparison of endometrial changes among symptomatic tamoxifen-treated and nontreated premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 66(2):233–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kedar RP et al (1994) Effects of tamoxifen on uterus and ovaries of postmenopausal women in a randomised breast cancer prevention trial. Lancet 343(8909):1318–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Noel Buy
    • 1
  • Michel Ghossain
    • 2
  1. 1.Service RadiologieHopital Hotel-DieuParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyHotel Dieu de FranceBeirutLebanon

Personalised recommendations