Advertisement

Holonification of a Network of Agents Based on Graph Theory

  • Monireh Abdoos
  • Ahmad Esmaeili
  • Nasser Mozayani
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7327)

Abstract

A multi-agent system consists of a group of interacting autonomous agents. The key problem in such a system is coordination and cooperation, i.e. how to ensure that individual decisions of the agents result in jointly optimal decisions for the overall system. This problem becomes even more serious when the number of the agents is large. Holonic model is an effective method to manage large scale problems. In holonic approaches, the formation of the initial holons is very critical and has a great influence on their performance and effectiveness. In this paper, we use a graph based modelling approach to group a population of agents with a greedy method, driven by a very simple and effective quality measure. The proposed method is evaluated by applying it to an urban traffic problem as a case study and it is shown the proposed method produces better results.

Keywords

Quality Measure Multiagent System Autonomous Agent Weighted Graph Large Scale Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Weiss, G.: Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Modern Approach to Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Theocharopoulou, C., Partsakoulakis, I., Vouros, G.A., Stergiou, K.: Overlay networks for task allocation and coordination in dynamic large-scale networks of cooperative agents. In: Proc. of 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, Hawaii, pp. 295–302 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Irandoust, H., Benaskeur, A.R.: Multi-organizational structures. In: Proc. of Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Chicago, pp. 25–33 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tianfield, H.: A new framework of holonic self-organization for multi-agent systems. In: Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Montreal, pp. 753–758 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koestler, A.: The Ghost in the Machine. Hutchinson (1967)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rodriguez, S., Hilaire, V., Koukam, A.: Towards a holonic multiple aspect analysis and modeling approach for complex systems: Application to the simulation of industrial plants. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 15, 521–543 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodriguez, S., Hilaire, V., Koukam, A.: Formal specification of holonic multi-agent. In: Proc. of International Conference on Computational Science, pp. 719–726 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deen, S.M.: A cooperation framework for holonic interactions in manufacturing. In: Proc. of the Second International Working Conference on CKBS, pp. 103–124 (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burckert, H.J., Fischer, K., Vierke, G.: Transportation scheduling with holonic mas - the teletruck approach. In: 3d International Conference on Practical Applications of Intelligent Agents and Multiagents, pp. 577–590 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rodriguez, S., Hilaire, V., Koukam, A.: Towards a methodological framework for holonic multi-agent systems. In: Proc. of Fourth International Workshop of Engineering Societies in the Agents World, London, pp. 179–185 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ulieru, M., Geras, A.: Emergent holarchies for e-health applications: a case in glaucoma diagnosis. In: Proc. of 28th Annual Conference of the Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 4, pp. 2957–2961 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brandes, U., Delling, D., Gaertler, M., Gorke, R.: On finding graph clusterings with maximum modularity. In: Proc. of 33rd International Workshop on Graph-Theoric Concepts in Computer Science, pp. 121–132 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schaeffer, S.E.: Survey graph clustering. Computer Science Review, 27–64 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kok, J.R., Hoen, P.J., Bakker, B., Vlassis, N.: Utile coordination: Learning interdependencies among cooperative agents. In: Proc. of IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games, Colchester, pp. 29–36 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Melo, F.S., Veloso, M.: Learning of coordination: Exploiting sparse interactions in multiagent systems. In: Proc. of 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, Budapest, pp. 773–780 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doniec, A., Mandiau, R., Piechowiak, S., Espie, S.: A behavioral multi agent for road traffic simulation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 21, 1443–1454 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hirankitti, V., Krohkaew, J., Hogger, C.: A multi-agent approach for intelligent traffic-light control. In: World Congress on Engineering, London (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, H.T., Yu, F., Li, W.: Step-coordination algorithm of traffic control based on multi-agent system. International Journal of Automation and Computing 6, 308–313 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hu, M.B., Jiang, R., Wu, Y.H., Wang, W.X., Wu, Q.S.: Urban traffic from the perspective of dual graph. The European Physical Journal B(63), 127–133 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chen, S.W., Yang, C.B., Peng, Y.H.: Algorithms for the traffic light setting problem on the graph model. In: Taiwanese Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1–8 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monireh Abdoos
    • 1
  • Ahmad Esmaeili
    • 1
  • Nasser Mozayani
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Engineering DepartmentIran University of Science and TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations