Abstract
Many North Americans now work in a global economy where corporations foster networked work – with employees participating in multiple teams and often for multiple purposes – and they do so in networked organizations – whose workers may be physically and organizationally dispersed. We analyze networked workers in one networked scholarly organization: the GRAND Network Centre of Excellence. Drawing on qualitative and social network data, we present our preliminary findings at the early stages of GRAND. Early discussions viewed networked organizations as the antithesis of traditional bureaucratic organizations and expected bureaucratic characteristics such as hierarchy, centralization and formalization to be absent and cross-boundary flows – the hallmark of networked organizations – to be prominent. Our research shows that reality is more complex than the early deductive expectations for networked organizations. The GRAND network is well positioned for cross-boundary flows but they are not yet extensive. In the distributed GRAND network, researchers communicate mostly via now-traditional email although in-person contact is almost as frequent. GRAND is designed with few formal hierarchical differences. Yet hierarchy matters when it comes to communication – researchers in higher positions have higher centrality in communication structures, both GRAND-wide and within projects, suggesting consistent advantages in their communication. Cross-disciplinary exchanges in GRAND are low at the network’s early stages, with little collaboration between Computer Science and Engineering, on the one hand, and Social Sciences and Humanities, on the other. Researchers in Arts and Technology emerge as the most active collaborators in the network both internally and externally. Work within provinces is still the norm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahuja, M. K., & Carley, K. M. (1999). Network structure in virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6): 741–757.
Baker, W. (1992). The network organization in theory and practice. N. Nohria, R. Eccles, eds. Networks and Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Berg, B. L. (2009). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (7th edition). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Birnholtz, J. (2005). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity in science and engineering research. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Black, J. & Edwards, S. (2000). Emergence of virtual or network organizations: fad or feature. Journal of Organizational Change, 13(6): 567–576.
Bos, N., Gergle, D. Olson, J. & Olson, G. (2001). Being there versus seeing there: trust via video. Proceedings of the CHI 2001 conference, Seattle. http://www.crew.umich.edu/publications.html.
Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Olson, J., Yew, J., Yerkie, J., Dahl, E., & Olson, G. (2008). From shared databases to Communities of Practice: a taxonomy of collaboratories. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2):318–338.
Breiger, R. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53:181–190.
Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H. & Swana, J. (2003). Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments. International Journal of Project Management, 21(3):157–166.
Burt, R., (2010). Neighbor Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cappelli, P., Bassi, L., Katz, H., Knoke, D., Osterman, P., & Useem, M. (1997). Change at Work. New York: Oxford University Press.
Caruso, D. & Rhoten, D. (2001). Lead, follow, get out of the way: sidestepping the barriers to effective practice of interdisciplinarity. Report for the Hybrid Vigor Institute, http://www.hybridvigor.net/publications.pl?s=interdis%26d=2001.04.30#.
Chen, W., Rainie, L, and Wellman, B. (2012). Networked Work. Chapter 7 in L. Rainie and B. Wellman, Networked: The New Social Operating System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Creswell, J. W. and Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cross, R., Borgatti, S.P., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. The Network Roundtable at the University of Virginia, https://webapp.comm.virginia.edu/SnaPortal/portals%5C0%5Cmaking_invisible_work_visible.pdf.
Cummings, J. & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5): 703–722.
Dimitrova, D. & Koku, E. (2009). Research communities in context: trust, independence and technology in professional communities. In D. Akoumianakis (Ed.), Virtual community practices and social interactive media: Technology lifecycle and workflow analysis (pp. 352–377), Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Dimitrova, D., & Koku, E. (2010). Managing Collaborative Research Networks: The Dual Life of A Virtual Community of Practice. International Journal of Virtual Communities and Social Networking, 2(4): 1–23.
Dimitrova, D., Koku, E., Wellman, B., & White, H. (2007). Network Mapping Study. Final Report to the Canadian Water Network of Centres of Excellence.
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class. New York: Basic Books.
Friedman, T. (2007). The World is Flat. New York : Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Galison, P. & Hevly, B. W. (1992). Big Science: the growth of large-scale research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hanneman, R. A. & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside http://faculty.ucr.edu/textasciitilde~hanneman/nettext/Introduction_to_Social_Network_Methods.pdf.
Haythornthwaite, C. & Wellman, B. (1998). Work, friendship and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(12): 1101–14.
Haythornthwaite, C. et al. (2003). Challenges in the practice and study of distributed, interdisciplinary collaboration. GSLIS Technical Report No.: UIUCLIS–2004/1+DKRC, http://www.lis.uiuc.edu/textasciitilde~haythorn/hay_challenges.html.
Hey, T., & Trefethen, A. (2008). E-science, cyber-infrastructure, and scholarly communication. In G. Olson, A. Zimmerman, and N. Bos (Eds.), Scientific Collaboration on the Internet (pp. 15–33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hollingshead, A., & Contractor, N. (2002). New media and organizaing at the group level. In Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. M. (Eds). Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs. London: Sage.
Howley, I., Chaudhuri, S., Kumar, R. and Ros, C. P. (2009). Motivation and collaboration on-line DOI: http://celstec.org/system/files/file/conference_proceedings/aeid2009/papers/paper_243.pdf.
Jarvenpaa, S., & Leidner, D. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6): 791–815.
Koku, E., Nazer, N., & Wellman, B. (2001). Netting scholars: online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(10): 1752–74.
Kollock, P. (1999). The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge.
Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: nonparametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks. 10 (4): 359–381.
Krackhardt, D. & Stern, R. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: an experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly 51(2), 123–140.
Krebs, V. (2007). Managing the 21st Century Organization. Institute of Human Resources and Information Management, 11(4): 2–8.
Mortensen, M., Woolley, A. W., & O’Leary, M. (2007). Conditions Enabling Effective Multiple Team Membership. International Federation for Information Processing Report No. 236.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Knopf. Olson, G. & Olson, J. (2003). Mitigating the effects of distance on collaborative intellectual work. Economic Innovation and New Technologies. 12(1): 27–42.
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human Computer Interaction, 15: 139–178.
Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Cooney, D. (2008). Success factors: Bridging distance in collaboration. In G. M. Olson, A. Zimmerman, & N. Bos (Eds.), Science on the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Olson, J., Hofer, E., Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Olson, G. D. Cooney, G., Faniel, I. (2008). A theory of remote scientific collaboration. In G. Olson, A. Zimmerman, and N. Bos (Eds.), Scientific Collaboration on the Internet (pp. 73–99), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Quan-Haase, A., & Wellman, B. (2004). Groups and networks : local virtuality in a high-tech networked organization. Analyse & Kritik, 26(1): 241.
Rafaeli, S., & Ariel, Y. (2008). Online motivational factors: incentives for participation and contribution in Wikipedia. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 243–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rainie, L. & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The New Social Operating System. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Reichardt, J. & Bornholdt, S. (2006). Statistical mechanics of community detection, Physical Review, 74, 016110.
Rhoten, D. (2003). National Science Foundation BCS-0129573.A multi-method analysis of the social and technical conditions for interdisciplinary collaboration. Report. Hybrid Vigor Institute http://hybridvigor.net/interdis/pubs/hv_pub_interdis-2003.09.29.pdf.
Shrum, W., Chompalov, I., & Genuth, J. (2001). Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science, 31(5):681–730.
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2008). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1): 643–681.
Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11):1492–1512.
Taylor, J. R. (1999). The other side of rationality: socially distributed cognition. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(2):317–26.
Walters, D., & Buchanan, J. (2001). The new economy, new opportunities and new structures. Management Decision, 39(10): 818–834.
Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Wellman, B. & Zhuo, X. (2012). Structural variation in scholarly teams: size, density and centralization. Presented to the International Social Network Conference, Redondo Beach, CA. March.
White, H., Wellman, B., & Nazer, N. (2004). Does citation reflect social structure? Longitudinal evidence from the ‘Globenet’ interdisciplinary research group. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 55(2): 111–126.
Wu, L., Lin, C-Y., Aral, S., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2009). Value of social network. Presented to the Winter Information Systems Conference, Salt Lake City, February http://smallblue.research.ibm.com.
Zheng, J., Veinott, E., Bos, N., Olson, J. & Olson, G. (2002).Trust without touch: jumpstarting long-distance trust with initial social activities. Proceedings of CHI. New York: ACM Press http://www.crew.umich.edu/publications.html
Acknowledgements
We thank GRAND for its support of its projects – and NAVEL in particular – and Lilia Smale for her editorial help.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dimitrova, D. et al. (2012). NAVEL Gazing: Studying a Networked Scholarly Organization. In: Kranakis, E. (eds) Advances in Network Analysis and its Applications. Mathematics in Industry, vol 18. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30904-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30904-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30903-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30904-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)