Skip to main content

Discharging Proof Obligations from Atelier B Using Multiple Automated Provers

  • Conference paper
Abstract State Machines, Alloy, B, VDM, and Z (ABZ 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7316))

Abstract

We present a method to discharge proof obligations from Atelier B using multiple SMT solvers. It is based on a faithful modeling of B’s set theory into polymorphic first-order logic. We report on two case studies demonstrating a significant improvement in the ratio of obligations that are automatically discharged.

This work is partly funded by the U3CAT project (ANR-08-SEGI-021, http://frama-c.com/u3cat/ ) of the French national research organization (ANR).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrial, J.-R.: The B-Book: Assigning programs to meanings. Cambridge University Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Badeau, F., Amelot, A.: Using B as a High Level Programming Language in an Industrial Project: Roissy VAL. In: Treharne, H., King, S., C. Henson, M., Schneider, S. (eds.) ZB 2005. LNCS, vol. 3455, pp. 334–354. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Barras, B.: Sets in Coq, Coq in sets. Journal of Formalized Reasoning (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett, C.W., Tinelli, C.: CVC3. In: Damm, W., Hermanns, H. (eds.) CAV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4590, pp. 298–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Behm, P., Benoit, P., Faivre, A., Meynadier, J.-M.: Météor: A Successful Application of B in a Large Project. In: Wing, J.M., Woodcock, J. (eds.) FM 1999. LNCS, vol. 1708, pp. 369–387. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bobot, F., Filliâtre, J.-C., Marché, C., Paskevich, A.: Why3: Shepherd your herd of provers. In: Workshop on Intermediate Verification Languages (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bobot, F., Paskevich, A.: Expressing Polymorphic Types in a Many-Sorted Language. In: Tinelli, C., Sofronie-Stokkermans, V. (eds.) FroCos 2011. LNCS, vol. 6989, pp. 87–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bodeveix, J.-P., Filali, M., Muñoz, C.: A formalization of the B-method in Coq and PVS. In: B-User Group Meeting, Formal Methods, pp. 33–49 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ClearSy. Language Keywords and Operators, 1.8.5 edn., http://www.tools.clearsy.com/images/3/33/Symboles_en.pdf

  10. Colin, S., Mariano, G.: Coq, l’alpha et l’omega de la preuve pour B ? (February 2009), http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00361302/PDF/bicoax.pdf

  11. Colin, S., Petit, D., Mariano, G., Poirriez, V.: BRILLANT: an open source platform for B. In: Workshop on Tool Building in Formal Methods (February 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Conchon, S., Contejean, E., Kanig, J., Lescuyer, S.: CC(X): Semantic combination of congruence closure with solvable theories. ENTCS 198(2), 51–69 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. de Moura, L., Bjørner, N.: Z3: An Efficient SMT Solver. In: Ramakrishnan, C.R., Rehof, J. (eds.) TACAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 4963, pp. 337–340. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Déharbe, D.: Integration of SMT-solvers in B and Event-B development environments. Science of Computer Programming (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jacquel, M., Berkani, K., Delahaye, D., Dubois, C.: Verifying B Proof Rules Using Deep Embedding and Automated Theorem Proving. In: Barthe, G., Pardo, A., Schneider, G. (eds.) SEFM 2011. LNCS, vol. 7041, pp. 253–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Milner, R.: A theory of type polymorphism in programming. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 17 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rocheteau, J., Colin, S., Mariano, G., Poirriez, V.: Évaluation de l’extensibilité de PhoX: B/PhoX un assistant de preuves pour B. In: JFLA, pp. 139–153 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mentré, D., Marché, C., Filliâtre, JC., Asuka, M. (2012). Discharging Proof Obligations from Atelier B Using Multiple Automated Provers. In: Derrick, J., et al. Abstract State Machines, Alloy, B, VDM, and Z. ABZ 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7316. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30885-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30885-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30884-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30885-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics