Advertisement

The Impact of a Special Interaction of Managerial Practices and Organizational Resources on Knowledge Creation

  • Jader Zelaya-Zamora
  • Dai Senoo
  • Kan-Ichiro Suzuki
  • Lasmin
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 172)

Abstract

This study analyzes how an apparent paradoxical combination of managerial practices and organizational resources affects the knowledge-creation capability of organizations. The propositions developed are theoretically supported and for the greatest part empirically validated, thus transcending the conventional understanding and generating insightful perspectives and practical implications for both academicians and practitioners.

Keywords

Managerial Practice Intellectual Property Knowledge Management Exploitation Resource Knowledge Creation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguinis, H., Harden, E.: Sample Size Rules of Thumb: Evaluating Three Common Practices. In: Lance, C., Vandenberg, R. (eds.) Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences, pp. 267–286. Routledge, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  2. Barney, J.B.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1), 99–120 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen, D.-N., Shie, Y.-J., Liang, T.-P.: The Impact of Knowledge Diversity on Software Project Team’s Performance. In: The 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Taipei, pp. 222–230 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. Chin, W.: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. Management Information Systems Quarterly 22(1), 7–16 (1998)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Comrey, A.: A First Course in Factor Analysis. Academic Press, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  6. Crossan, M., Hurst, D.: Strategic renewal as improvisation: reconciling the tension between exploration and exploitation. Working Paper, Ivey Business School, Ontario (2003)Google Scholar
  7. Farjoun, M.: Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change as a Duality. Academy of Management Review 35(2), 202–225 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Field, A.: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Sage Publications, London (2005)Google Scholar
  9. Grant, R.: Prospering in Dynamically-Competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science 7(4), 375–387 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hair, J., Andersen, R., Tathan, R., Black, W.: Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice-Hall, NJ (1998)Google Scholar
  11. Hirunyawipada, T., Beyerlein, M., Blankson, C.: Cross-functional integration as a knowledge transformation mechanism: Implications for new product development. Industrial Marketing Management 39, 650–660 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holsapple, C.W., Joshi, K.D.: Organizational knowledge resources. Decision Support Systems 31, 39–54 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holsapple, C., Joshi, K.: An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9, 235–261 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsu, I.-C.: Knowledge sharing practices as a facilitating factor for improving organizational performance through human capital: a preliminary test. Expert Systems with Applications 35, 1316–1326 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hunt, J.W.: The restless organization. Wiley and sons Australasia Pty. Ltd., Sydney (1972)Google Scholar
  16. Kankanhally, A., Tan, B., Wei, K.: Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repository: An Empirical Investigation. Management Information Systems Quarterly 29(1), 113–143 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. Kim, S., Lee, H.: Employee Knowledge Sharing Capabilities in Public and Private Organizations: Does Organizational Context Matter? In: 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, pp. 249–258 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. King, W., Marks, J.P.: Motivating Knowledge Sharing through a Knowledge Management System. International Journal of Management Science 36(1), 131–146 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. Kline, P.: The Handbook of Psychological Testing. Routledge, London (1999)Google Scholar
  20. Kogut, B., Zander, U.: Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science 3(3), 383–397 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kulkarni, U., Ravindran, S., Freeze, R.: A Knowledge Management Success Model: Theoretical Development and Empirical Validation. Journal of Management Information Systems 23(3), 309–347 (2006-2007)Google Scholar
  22. Lee, H., Choi, B.: Knowledge Management Enablers, Processes, and Organizational Performance: An Integrative View and Empirical Examination. Journal of Management Information Systems 20(1), 179–228 (2003)Google Scholar
  23. Leonard-Barton, D.: Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the source of innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1995)Google Scholar
  24. March, J.: Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1), 71–87 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Namvar, M., Fathian, M., Akhavan, P., Reza, M.: Exploring the impacts of intellectual property on intellectual capital and company performance. Management Decision 48(5), 676–697 (2010)Google Scholar
  26. Nonaka, I.: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science 5(1), 14–37 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  28. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Konno, N.: SECI, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning 33, 5–34 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pee, L., Kankanhalli, A.: Knowledge management capability: a resource-based comparison of public and private organizations. In: International Conference on Information Systems, Phoenix, pp. 1–19 (2009)Google Scholar
  30. Peters, T., Waterman, J.R.: Managing Ambiguity and Paradox; Simultaneous Loose-Tight Properties. In: Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies, pp. 89–118, 318–325. Harper Collins Publishers, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  31. Senoo, D., Magnier-Watanabe, R., Salmador, M.P.: Workplace reformation, active ba and knowledge creation: from a conceptual to a practical framework. European Journal of Innovation Management 10(3), 296–315 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Thoms, P.: Driven by time: time orientation and leadership. Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc., Westport (2004)Google Scholar
  33. Venkatraman, N.: The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence. The Academy of Management Review 14(3), 423–444 (1989)Google Scholar
  34. Vera, D., Crossan, M.: Improvisation and Innovative Performance in Teams. Organization Science 16(3), 203–224 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wade, M., Hulland, J.: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension and suggestion for future research. MIS Quaterly 28(1), 107–142 (2004)Google Scholar
  36. Zelaya-Zamora, J., Senoo, D.: An approach to develop novel and practical knowledge management research. In: Sixth International KMO Conference “Knowledge Management for Sustainable Innovation”, Tokyo (2011)Google Scholar
  37. Zsulanski, G.: Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm. Strategic Management Journal 17, 27–43 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jader Zelaya-Zamora
    • 1
  • Dai Senoo
    • 1
  • Kan-Ichiro Suzuki
    • 2
  • Lasmin
    • 2
  1. 1.Tokyo Institute of TechnologyTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific UniversityBeppuJapan

Personalised recommendations