Advertisement

The Use of Smart Mobile Equipment for the Innovation in Organizational Coordination

  • Namjae Cho
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Digital Spaces book series (BRIEFSDIGIT)

Abstract

There is a series of emerging information technologies that have a good potential to enable emergent business innovation. Most of all, the new smart phone is an offspring of digital convergence of network, media, and electronic equipments. Smart phone, being an enabler of telecommunications network and open internet network access, help business people use diverse modes of data, information, images, and video on a unified mobile application platform. One major impact of such convergence is the increase of innovation potential in the structure and process of organizational coordination.

Keywords

Smart Phone Customer Relationship Management Task Characteristic Social Network Service Enterprise Resource Planning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, and benefits, Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 1(2).Google Scholar
  2. Argyres, N. (1999). The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 ‘Stealth’ Bomber. Organization Science, 10(2), 162–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arshinder, A. K., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2008). Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies, and research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 316–335.Google Scholar
  4. Astley W. G., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1983). Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 245–273.Google Scholar
  5. Ballou, R. H., Gilbert, S. M., & Mukherjee, A. (2000). New managerial challenges from supply chain opportunities. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 7–18.Google Scholar
  6. Barratt, M. (2004). Understanding the meaning of collaboration in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9(1), 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basole, R. (2007). Strategic planning for enterprise mobility: A readiness-centric approach. association for information system proceeding.Google Scholar
  8. Beulen, E., & Streng, R. (2002). The impact of online mobile office applications on the effectiveness and efficiency of mobile workers behavior: A field experiment in the IT services sector. Proceedings of 23rd ICIS Conference.Google Scholar
  9. Blili, S., Raymond, L., & Rivard, S. (1998). Impact of task uncertainty, end user involvement and competence on the success of end user computing. Information Management, 33, 137–153.Google Scholar
  10. Bonabeau, E. (2003). Don’t trust your gut. Harvard Business Review, 116–123.Google Scholar
  11. Boudreau, M. C., & Robey, D. (2005). Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science, 16(1), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Broadcasting and Communications Council of Korea (2010). National Plan to Roll-out Wireless Internet for Advanced Smart Mobile Society 4.Google Scholar
  13. Byström, K. (2002). Information and information sources in tasks of varying complexity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(7), 581–591.Google Scholar
  14. Byström, K., & Järvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 31(2), 191–213.Google Scholar
  15. Cachon, G. P., & Fisher, M. (2000). Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Science, 46(8), 1032–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cherry, C. (2007). The telephone system: Creator of mobility and social change. The social impact of the telephone. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Cho, N., Li, G., & Su, C. (2007). Am empirical study on the effect of individual factors on knowledge sharing by knowledge type. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 3(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  18. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Trevino, L. K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 355–366.Google Scholar
  20. Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.Google Scholar
  21. Ding, D., & Chen, J. (2008). Coordinating three level supply chain with flexible returns policies. Omega, 36(4), 865–876.Google Scholar
  22. Durlacher Research Ltd, Mobile Commerce Report (2000).Google Scholar
  23. Faraj, S. A., & Xiao, Y. (2006). Coordination in fast-response organizations. Management Science, 52(8), 1155–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organization design. Reading: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  25. Gebauer, J., & Shaw, M. (2004). Usage and impact of mobile business application-an assessment based on the concepts of task/technology fit. Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems. New York, August, 2004.Google Scholar
  26. Gebauer J. (2006) Task-technology fit for mobile information systems. Available at. http://www.business.uiuc.edu/ Working_Papers/papers/06-0107.
  27. Ghani, J. A. (1992). Task uncertainty and the use of computer technology. Information and Management, 12(2), 69–76.Google Scholar
  28. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structure. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gittell, J. H., & Weiss, L. (2004). Coordination networks within and across organizations: A multi-level framework, Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 127–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goodhue, D., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.Google Scholar
  31. Gordon, L. A., & Miller, D. (1976). A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1(1), 59–69.Google Scholar
  32. Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (1996). Telecommunications and the city: Electronic spaces. Urban Places, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hoyt, J., & Huq, F. (2000). From arms-length to collaborative relationships in the supply chain: An evolutionary process. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 30(9), 750–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kakihara, M., & Sorensen, C. (2002). Mobility: An extended perspective. HICSS Proceeding, 2002.Google Scholar
  35. Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 783–808.Google Scholar
  36. King, R. C., & Xia, W. (1997). Media appropriateness: Effects of experience on communication media choice. Decision Science, 28(4), 877–910.Google Scholar
  37. Kirs, P. J., Sanders, G. L., Ceveny, R. P., & Robey, D. (1989). An Experimental validation of the Gorry and Scott Morton Framework. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 183–197Google Scholar
  38. KT Economics Research Center (2010). Economy effect of mobile office, March 2010.Google Scholar
  39. Ling, T. P. (1986). Critical success factors of decision support systems: An experimental study. Database, 17(2), 3–16.Google Scholar
  40. Majchzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 569–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malone, T., & Crowston, K. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87–119.Google Scholar
  42. Melnyk, S. A., Davis, E. W., Spekman, R. E., & Sandor, J. (2010). Outcome-driven supply chains. MIT Sloan Management Review, 51(2), 33–38.Google Scholar
  43. Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1998). Competing by design: The power of organizational architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.Google Scholar
  45. Osborn, R. N., & Hunt, J. G. (1974). Environment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(2), 231–246.Google Scholar
  46. Pearce. J. L., Sommer, S. M., Morris, A., & Frideger, M. (1992). A configurational approach to interpersonal relations: Profiles of workplace social relations and task interdependence, GSM#OB92015 1992. Irvine: University of California.Google Scholar
  47. Perrow. (1986). Complex organizations a critical essay. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  48. Rice, R. E. (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3(4), 475–500.Google Scholar
  49. Samsung Economics Research Institute (2010). Smart phone opens a new future, 3 Feb 2010.Google Scholar
  50. Sanders, G. L., & Courtney, J. F. (1985). A field study of organizational factors influencing DSS success. MIS Quartely, 9(1), 77–89.Google Scholar
  51. Sharma. R., & Yetton, P. (2007). The contingent effects of training, technical complexity and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 219–238.Google Scholar
  52. Sheer, V. C., & Chen, L. (2004). Improving media richness theory: A study of interaction goals, message valence, and task complexity in manager-subordinate communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 11(1). Google Scholar
  53. Staples, D. S., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2000). Using Electronic Media for Information Sharing Activities: A replication and extension (pp.117–133). Proceedings of the 21st ICIS, December 10–13.Google Scholar
  54. Swingedouw, E. (1993). Communication, mobility and the struggle for power over space, In G. Gianopoulos & A. Gillespie (Eds.), Transportation and communication innovation in Europe.Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organization in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  56. Tichy, N. (1983). Managing strategic change: Technical, Political and cultural dynamics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  57. Turban, E., & King, D. (2003). Introduction to E-commerce. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
  58. Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organization design. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 613–624.Google Scholar
  59. Van de Ven, A. H., & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Weill, P., & Olson, M. (1989). An assessment of contingency theory. Journal of Information System, 6(1), 59–86.Google Scholar
  61. Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1986). Structural adaptations to environments. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 9–21.Google Scholar
  62. Zhou, H., & W. C. Benton Jr. (2007). Supply chain practice and information sharing. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1348–1365.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementHanyang UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea (South Korea)

Personalised recommendations