Advertisement

A Queueing Theoretic Approach to Decoupling Inventory

  • Eline De Cuypere
  • Koen De Turck
  • Dieter Fiems
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7314)

Abstract

This paper investigates the performance of different hybrid push-pull systems with a decoupling inventory at the semi-finished products and reordering thresholds. Raw materials are ‘pushed’ into the semi-finished product inventory and customers ‘pull’ products by placing orders. Furthermore, production of semi-finished products starts when the inventory goes below a certain level, referred to as the threshold value and stops when the inventory attains stock capacity. As performance of the decoupling stock is critical to the overall cost and performance of manufacturing systems, this paper introduces a Markovian model for hybrid push-pull systems. In particular, we focus on a queueing model with two buffers, thereby accounting for both the decoupling stock as well as for possible backlog of orders. By means of numerical examples, we assess the impact of different reordering policies, irregular order arrivals, the set-up time distribution and the order processing time distribution on the performance of hybrid push-pull systems.

Keywords

Lead Time Arrival Rate Poisson Arrival Markovian Arrival Process Modulate Chain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bell, P.: A decoupling inventory problem with storage capacity constraints. Operations Research 28, 476–488 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blecker, T., Abdelkafi, N.: Complexity and variety in mass customization systems: analysis and recommendations. Management Decision 44(7), 908–929 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bonomi, F.: An approximate analysis for a class of assembly-like queues. Queueing Systems Theory and Applications, 289–309 (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang, K., Lu, Y.: Queueing analysis on a single-station make-to-stock/make-to-order inventory-production system. Applied Mathematical Modelling 34, 978–991 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cochran, J., Kim, S.: Optimizing a serially combined push and pull manufacturing system by simulated annealing. In: Second International Conference on Engineering Design and Automation (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Cuypere, E., Fiems, D.: Performance Evaluation of a Kitting Process. In: Al-Begain, K., Balsamo, S., Fiems, D., Marin, A. (eds.) ASMTA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6751, pp. 175–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghrayeb, O., Phojanamongkolkij, N., Tan, B.: A hybrid push/pull system in assemble-to-order manufacturing environment. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 20, 379–387 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harris, F.: How many parts to make at once. Factory, the Magazine of Management 10(2), 135–136 (1913)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrison, J.: Assembly-like queues. Journal of Applied Probability 10(2), 354–367 (1973)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoekstra, S., Romme, J., Argelo, S.: Integral logistic structures: developing customer-oriented goods flow. McGraw-Hill (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hopp, W.J., Simon, J.T.: Bounds and heuristics for assembly-like queues. Queueing Systems 4, 137–156 (1989)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hopp, W., Spearman, M.: Factory physics: Foundations of manufacturing management. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaminsky, P., Kaya, O.: Combined make-to-order/make-to-stock supply chains. IIE Transactions 41, 103–119 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Latouche, G.: Queues with paired customers. Journal of Applied Probability 18, 684–696 (1981)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Latouche, G., Ramaswami, V.: Introduction to Matrix Analytic Methods in Stochastic Modeling. SIAM (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, C.: A recent development of the integrated manufacturing system: A hybrid of mrp and jit. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 13(4), 3–17 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lipper, E., Sengupta, B.: Assembly-like queues with finite capacity: bounds, asymptotics and aproximations. Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications 18, 684 (1986)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ohta, H., Hirota, T., Rahim, A.: Optimal production-inventory policy for make-to-order versus make-to-stock based on the m/er/1 queuing model. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies 33, 36–41 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pandey, P., Khokhajaikiat, P.: Performance modeling of multistage production systems operating under hybrid push-pull control. International Journal Production Economics 43, 115–126 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ramachandran, K., Whitman, L., Ramachandran, A.: Criteria for determining the push-pull boundary. In: Industrial Engineering Research Conference. Orlando, FL, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Som, P., Wilhelm, W.: Analysis of stochastic assembly with GI-distributed assembly time. INFORMS Journal on Computing 11, 104–116 (1999)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Som, P., Wilhelm, W., Disney, R.: Kitting process in a stochastic assembly system. Queueing Systems 17, 471–490 (1994)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soman, C., van Donk, D., Gaalman, G.: Combined make-to-order and make-to-stock in a food production system. International Journal of Production Economics 90, 223–235 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spearman, M., Zazamis, M.: Push and pull production systems: Issues and comparisons. Operations Research 3, 521–532 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Takahashi, K., Nakamura, N.: Push pull, or hybrid control in supply chain management. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 17(2), 126–140 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eline De Cuypere
    • 1
  • Koen De Turck
    • 1
  • Dieter Fiems
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Telecommunications and Information ProcessingGhent UniversityBelgium

Personalised recommendations