Abstract
Several recent critiques have claimed that the empirical foundations of generative linguistics are weak due to the reliance on informally gathered grammaticality judgments drawn from the intuitions of the researcher. Phillips (In: Japanese/Korean linguistics, vol. 17, 2009) argued i.a. that, in order for there to be a theoretical crisis, two criteria should be fulfilled, namely (i) intuitive judgments have led to generalizations that are widely accepted yet bogus, and (ii) misleading judgments form the basis of important theoretical claims or debates. Furthermore Phillips claimed that (i, ii) have not been fulfilled. I argue that (i, ii) have in fact been satisfied because Chomsky’s (Q. Prog. Rep.—Mass. Inst. Technol., Res. Lab. Electron. 41:64–65, 1956; Syntactic structures. Mouton, The Hague, 1957) intuition-based claim that English is not a finite-state language is demonstrably false.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bach, Emmon. 1974. Syntactic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Carlson, Lauri. 2006. Parsing spoken dialogue. In A man of measure: Festschrift in honour of Fred Karlsson. on his 60th birthday, eds. Mickael Suominen, Antti Arppe, Anu Airola, Orvokki Heinämäki, Matti Miestamo, Urho Määttä, Jussi Niemi, Kari K. Pitkänen, and Kaius Sinnemäki. Vol. 19 of SKY journal of linguistics, 128–137. Turku: The Linguistic Association of Finland. http://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/sky2006special.shtml (special supplement).
Chomsky, Noam. 1956. On the limits of finite-state description. Quarterly Progress Report—Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics 41: 64–65.
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Greene, Judith. 1972. Psycholinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Harley, Trevor. 1995. The psychology of language. From data to theory. Hove: Erlbaum.
Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky, and W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–1579.
Hobbs, Jerry R., Douglas Appelt, John Bear, David Israel, Megumi Kameyama, Mark Stickel, and Tyson Mabry. 1997. FASTUS: A cascaded finite-state transducer for extracting information from natural-language text. In Finite-state language processing, eds. Emmanuel Roche and Yves Schabes, 383–406. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Karlsson, Fred. 2007. Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics 43: 365–392.
Levelt, Willem J.M. 1974. Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Vol. II: Applications in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.
Manaster Ramer, Alexis. 1983. Soft formal underbelly of theoretical syntax. In Papers from the 19th regional meeting, 256–262. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Miller, George A., and Noam Chomsky. 1963. Finitary models of language users. In Handbook of mathematical psychology, II. eds. R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush, and Eugene Galanter. New York: Wiley.
Partee, Barbara H., Alice ter Meulen, and Robert E. Wall. 1993. Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Phillips, Colin. 2009. Should we impeach armchair linguists. In Japanese/Korean linguistics, eds. Shoichi Iwasaki, Hajime Hoji, Patriciam M. Clancy, and Sung-Ock Sohn, Vol. 17. Stanford: CSLI.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karlsson, F. (2012). Is There a Crisis in Generative Linguistics?. In: Santos, D., Lindén, K., Ng’ang’a, W. (eds) Shall We Play the Festschrift Game?. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30773-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30773-7_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30772-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30773-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)