Skip to main content

Is There a Crisis in Generative Linguistics?

  • Chapter
Shall We Play the Festschrift Game?
  • 540 Accesses

Abstract

Several recent critiques have claimed that the empirical foundations of generative linguistics are weak due to the reliance on informally gathered grammaticality judgments drawn from the intuitions of the researcher. Phillips (In: Japanese/Korean linguistics, vol. 17, 2009) argued i.a. that, in order for there to be a theoretical crisis, two criteria should be fulfilled, namely (i) intuitive judgments have led to generalizations that are widely accepted yet bogus, and (ii) misleading judgments form the basis of important theoretical claims or debates. Furthermore Phillips claimed that (i, ii) have not been fulfilled. I argue that (i, ii) have in fact been satisfied because Chomsky’s (Q. Prog. Rep.—Mass. Inst. Technol., Res. Lab. Electron. 41:64–65, 1956; Syntactic structures. Mouton, The Hague, 1957) intuition-based claim that English is not a finite-state language is demonstrably false.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bach, Emmon. 1974. Syntactic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Lauri. 2006. Parsing spoken dialogue. In A man of measure: Festschrift in honour of Fred Karlsson. on his 60th birthday, eds. Mickael Suominen, Antti Arppe, Anu Airola, Orvokki Heinämäki, Matti Miestamo, Urho Määttä, Jussi Niemi, Kari K. Pitkänen, and Kaius Sinnemäki. Vol. 19 of SKY journal of linguistics, 128–137. Turku: The Linguistic Association of Finland. http://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/sky2006special.shtml (special supplement).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1956. On the limits of finite-state description. Quarterly Progress Report—Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research Laboratory of Electronics 41: 64–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Judith. 1972. Psycholinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, Trevor. 1995. The psychology of language. From data to theory. Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky, and W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, Jerry R., Douglas Appelt, John Bear, David Israel, Megumi Kameyama, Mark Stickel, and Tyson Mabry. 1997. FASTUS: A cascaded finite-state transducer for extracting information from natural-language text. In Finite-state language processing, eds. Emmanuel Roche and Yves Schabes, 383–406. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson, Fred. 2007. Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics 43: 365–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, Willem J.M. 1974. Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics. Vol. II: Applications in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manaster Ramer, Alexis. 1983. Soft formal underbelly of theoretical syntax. In Papers from the 19th regional meeting, 256–262. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, George A., and Noam Chomsky. 1963. Finitary models of language users. In Handbook of mathematical psychology, II. eds. R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush, and Eugene Galanter. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara H., Alice ter Meulen, and Robert E. Wall. 1993. Mathematical methods in linguistics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Colin. 2009. Should we impeach armchair linguists. In Japanese/Korean linguistics, eds. Shoichi Iwasaki, Hajime Hoji, Patriciam M. Clancy, and Sung-Ock Sohn, Vol. 17. Stanford: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred Karlsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karlsson, F. (2012). Is There a Crisis in Generative Linguistics?. In: Santos, D., Lindén, K., Ng’ang’a, W. (eds) Shall We Play the Festschrift Game?. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30773-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30773-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30772-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30773-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics