Advertisement

Eurocleft and Americleft Studies: Experiments in Intercenter and International Collaboration

  • Ross E. LongJr.
  • William C. Shaw
  • Gunvor Semb
Chapter

Abstract

It goes without saying that professionals involved in health care have a continuing obligation to review the quality of care they provide. As stated in a WHO report (2002):

Keywords

Orthodontic Treatment Cleft Palate Lateral Incisor Mixed Dentition Skeletal Morphology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alex R (2011) Indiacleft. In: Proceedings 9th European congress, Salzburg, 2011Google Scholar
  2. Asher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw WC, Gallager C (1991) Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 28:385–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asher-McDade C, Brattström V, Dahl E et al (1992) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 4. Assessment of nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:409–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atack NE, Hathorn IS, Semb G et al (1997) A new index for assessing surgical outcome in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects aged five: reproducibility and validity. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 34:242–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bellardie H (2011) South-Africleft.’ In: Proceedings 9th European congress, Salzburg, 2011Google Scholar
  6. Bongaarts CAM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van’t Hof MA et al (2004) The effect of infant orthopedics on the occlusion of the deciduous dentition in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J 41:633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bongaarts CAM, van’t Hof MA, Prahl-Andersen B et al (2006) Infant orthopedics has no effect on maxillary arch dimensions in the deciduous dentition of children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brattström V, Mølsted K, Prahl-Andersen B et al (2005) The Eurocleft study: longitudinal follow-up of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:69–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cordero KN, Baylis AL, Chapman KL, Dixon AJ, Dobbelsteyn C, Harding-Bell A, Sell D, Sweeney T, Thurmes A, Trost-Cardamone J, Wilson KD (2012) The Americleft speech project: training, trials and reliability outcomes. In: 69th annual meeting, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, San Jose, 11–17 Apr 2012Google Scholar
  10. Daskalogiannakis J, Dugas G, Long Jr RE, Hathaway, R (2010) Cephalometric comparison of treatment outcome in CBLCLP from 3 different centers. In: 67th annual meeting, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, Fort Worth, 15–20 Mar 2010Google Scholar
  11. Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Russell K, Long RE Jr, Hathaway R, Cohen M, Semb G, Shaw WC (2011) The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 3. Analysis of craniofacial form. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:252–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL (1994) Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Dogan S (2011) Turkeycleft. In: Proceedings 9th European congress, Salzburg, 2011Google Scholar
  14. Flinn W, Long RE, Garattini G et al (2006) A multicenter outcome assessment of five-year-old patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:253–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fudalej P, Hortis-Dzierbicka M, Dudkiewicz Z et al (2009) Dental arch relationship in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate following Warsaw (one-stage simultaneous repair) and Oslo protocols. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 46:648–653PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaukroger MJ, Noar JH, Sanders R et al (2002) A cephalometric inter-centre comparison of growth in children with cleft lip and palate. J Orthod 29:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grunwell P, Brøndsted K, Henningsson G et al (2000) A six-center international study of the outcome of treatment in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: the results of a cross-linguistic investigation of cleft palate speech. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 34:219–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hathaway R, Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Russell K, Long Jr RE, Semb G, Shaw WC, Shue J (2008) The Americleft project panel: a comparison of dental arch relationships in bilateral cleft lip and palate. In: 65th annual meeting, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, Philadelphia, 14–18 Apr 2008Google Scholar
  19. Hathaway R, Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Russell K, Long RE Jr, Cohen M, Semb G, Shaw WC (2011) The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 2. Dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:244–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. John A, Sell D, Harding-Bell A, Sweeney T, Williams A (2006) CAPS-A – a validated and reliable measure for auditing cleft speech. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:272–288PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuehn DP, Moller KT (2000) Speech and language issues in the cleft palate population: the state-of-art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 37:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Long RE Jr, Hathaway R, Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Russell K, Cohen M, Semb G, Shaw WC (2011) The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 1. Principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:239–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacKay F, Bottomley J, Semb G et al (1994) A two center study of dentofacial development in the five year old child with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 31:372–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mars M, Plint DA, Houston WJB, Bergland O, Semb G (1987) The Goslon Yardstick: a new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 24:314–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mars M, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V et al (1992) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 3. Dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:405–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meazzini MC, Giussani G, Morabito A et al (2008) A cephalometric intercenter comparison of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: analysis at 5 and 10 years of age and long term. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 45:654–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meazzini M, Rossetti G, Garattini G et al (2010) Early secondary gingivo-alveolo-plasty in the treatment of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: 20 years experience. J Cranio Maxillofacial Surg 38:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mercado A, Peanchitlertkajorn S, Daskalogiannakis J, Hathaway R, Lamichane M, Russell K, Semb G, Long Jr RE (2011a) The Americleft project: an expansion of the Americleft intercenter comparisons of nasolabial appearance outcomes to include a center using NAM as part of its primary protocol. In: 68th annual meeting, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, San Juan, 4–9 Apr 2011Google Scholar
  29. Mercado A, Russell K, Long RE Jr, Hathaway R, Daskalogiannakis J, Cohen M, Semb G, Shaw WC (2011b) The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 4. Nasolabial aesthetics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:259–264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mølsted K, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V et al (1992) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 2. Craniofacial form and soft tissue profile. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:398–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mølsted K, Dahl E, Brattström V et al (1993a) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: evaluation of maxillary asymmetry. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 30:22–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mølsted K, Dahl E, Skovgaard LT et al (1993b) A multicenter comparison of treatment regimes for unilateral cleft lip and palate using a multiple regression model. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 27:277–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mølsted K, Brattström V, Prahl-Andersen B et al (2005) The Eurocleft study: longitudinal follow-up of patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 3: dental arch relationship. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:78–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nollet P, Katsaros C, van’t Hof M et al (2005) Treatment outcome after two-stage palatal closure in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a comparison with eurocleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:512–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nordin K-E, Larson O, Nylén B et al (1983) Early bone grafting in complete cleft lip and palate cases following maxillofacial orthopedics. I. The method and the skeletal development from seven to thirteen years of age. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 17:33–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ozawa TO, Shaw WC, Katsaros C, Kuijper-Jagtman AM, Hagberg C, Rønning E, Semb G (2011) A new yardstick for rating dental arch relationship in patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:167–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peanchitlertkajorn S, Russell K, Daskalogiannakis J, Lamichane M, Mercado A, Hathaway R, Long Jr RE, Gregory J (2010) The Americleft project: an expansion of the Americleft intercenter comparisons of ­dental arch relationship to include a center using NAM +/− GPP as part of its primary protocol. In: 67th annual meeting, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, Fort Worth, 15–20 Mar 2010Google Scholar
  38. Peanchitlertkajorn S, Daskalogiannakis J, Lamichane M, Mercado A, Hathaway R, Russell K, Long Jr RE, Gregory J (2011) The Americleft project: a multi-center retrospective study of patients with CUCLP from 5 North American Centers. In: 68th annual meeting, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, San Juan, 4–9 Apr 2011Google Scholar
  39. Prahl C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van’t Hof MA et al (2001) A randomized prospective clinical trial into the effect of infant orthopaedics on maxillary arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Oral Sci 109:297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prahl C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van’t Hof MA et al (2003) A randomized prospective clinical trial of the effect of infant orthopedics in unilateral cleft lip and palate: prevention of collapse of the alveolar segments (Dutchcleft). Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40:337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roberts-Harry D, Hathorn I, Semb G et al (1996) Facial growth in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: a two centre study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 33:489–493PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robertson NRE, Jolleys A (1968) Effects of early bone grafting in complete clefts of lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:414–421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robertson NRE, Jolleys A (1983) An 11-year follow-up of the effects of early bone grafting in infants born with complete clefts of the lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg 36:438–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ruppel J, Long Jr RE, Semb G, Hathaway RR, Mercado A, Russell K, Lamichane M, Daskalogiannakis J (2012) The Americleft project: a two-center comparison of short and long term outcomes. In: 69th annual meeting, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, San Jose, 17–21 Apr 2012Google Scholar
  45. Russell K, Long RE Jr, Hathaway R, Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Cohen M, Semb G, Shaw WC (2011a) The Americleft study: an inter-center study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:265–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Russell KA, Long Jr RE, Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Lamichane M, Hathaway RR, Semb G, Shaw WC (2011b) The Americleft project: multicenter retrospective secondary alveolar bone grafting outcome study. In: 68th annual meeting, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, San Juan, 4–9 Apr 2011Google Scholar
  47. Russell KA, Long Jr RE, Lamichane M, Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Hathaway RR, Semb G, Shaw WC (2012) Americleft – the SWAG method used to assess secondary alveolar bone grafts in the mixed and permanent dentitions and aid in future decision making. In: 69th annual meeting, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, San Jose, 17–21 Apr 2012Google Scholar
  48. Sell D, Grunwell P, Mildinhall S et al (2001) Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom – the clinical standards advisory group (CSAG) study: part 3 – speech outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:30–37PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Semb G, Brattström V, Mølsted K et al (2005a) The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 1: introduction and treatment experience. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:64–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Semb G, Brattström V, Mølsted K et al (2005b) The Eurocleft study: longitudinal follow-up of patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 4: relationship between treatment outcome, patient/parent satisfaction and the burden of care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:83–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shaw WC, Semb G (1996) Facial growth in orofacial clefting disorders. In: Turvey TA, Vig KWL, Fonseca RJ (eds) Principles and management of facial clefting disorders and craniosynostosis. WB Saunders Co., Philadelphia, pp 28–56Google Scholar
  52. Shaw WC, Asher-McDade C, Brattström V et al (1992a) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 1. Principles and study design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:393–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shaw WC, Dahl E, Asher-McDade C et al (1992b) A six-center international study of treatment outcome in patients with clefts of the lip and palate: part 5. General discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:413–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shaw WC, Semb G, Nelson P et al (2001) The Eurocleft project 1996–2000: overview. J Cranio Maxillofac Surg 29:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shaw WC, Brattström V, Mølsted K et al (2005) The Eurocleft study: longitudinal follow-up of patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 5: discussion and conclusions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:93–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Singer E (2012) Burden of care analysis of infant orthopedics for improvement of nasolabial aesthetics in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Toronto, School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  57. Susami T, Ogihara Y, Matsuzaki M et al (2006) Assessment of dental arch relationships in Japanese patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate using a five-category rating. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:96–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams AC, Bearn DR, Mildinhall S et al (2001) Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom – the clinical standards advisory group (CSAG) study: part 2 – dentofacial outcomes, psychosocial status and patient satisfaction. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:24–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson KD, Thurmes A, Baylis AL, Cordero KN, Dixon AJ, Dobbelsteyn C, Chapman KL, Sell D, Trost-Cardamone J (2012) Americleft speech project: overcoming distance with technology. In: 69th annual meeting, American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association, San Jose, 11–17 Apr 2012Google Scholar
  60. World Health Organization (2001) Global strategies towards reducing the health-care burden of craniofacial anomalies. Report of WHO meetings on international collaborative research on craniofacial anomalies. WHO Human Genetics Programme, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ross E. LongJr.
    • 1
  • William C. Shaw
    • 2
  • Gunvor Semb
    • 2
  1. 1.Lancaster Cleft Palate ClinicLancasterUSA
  2. 2.Department of OrthodonticsUniversity of Manchester, School of DentistryManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations