Advertisement

Evaluation of Production Processes Using Hybrid Simulation

  • Norbert Gronau
  • Hanna TheuerEmail author
  • Sander Lass
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)

Abstract

Changing market conditions, variable customer demands and growing customer requirements are some reasons for producing companies to create flexible and adaptable processes and to fulfil the customer demands in a high quality. For this reason it may be beneficial to change the production system from a centralized towards a decentralized production management approach. It is of high importance to figure out the best mix of centralized and decentralized production control for every company separately, while at the same time ensuring that the process continues running. Comprehensive analyses often turn out to be time-consuming and expensive. Especially small and medium sized enterprises have to avoid these side-effects. This article presents a method for the fast and well-founded evaluation of the best mix of decentralized and centralized production control by using autonomous technologies.

Keywords

Decentralized production control Hybrid simulation Autonomous technologies Robust production control 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The project upon which this publication is based is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (BMWi) under the project number: 01MA09018A. This publication reflects the views of only the authors.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Lass, S., Theuer, H., Gronau, N.: A new approach for simulation and modeling of autonomous production processes. In: Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2012), Maui, Hawaii, pp. 1247–1256. Jan 2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Association of German Engineers (VDI) : VDI-Guideline 4499—Digital Factory—Basics, (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure), Beuth, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muhs, D., et al.: Roloff/Matek—Machine Elements, Wiesbaden, Germany, p. 9 (2007) (in German)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Westkämper, E.: Management of production in a turbulent environment. In: PPS Management 12, 2. Berlin, p. 70 (2007) (in German)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scholz-Reiter, B., Lütjen, M.: Digital factory—basic approaches of an integrated design of products and processes, In: Industrie Management 25, 1. Berlin, p. 19 (2009) (in German)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Freund, G.: Development of a Methodical Procedure for Implementation of Digital-Mock-Up- Technologies in Automotive Product Construction, Freiberg (2004) (in German)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Syska, A.: Production Managment: Important Methods and Concepts for Today’s Production, Gabler Wiesbaden, (2006) (in German)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Institut für Produktionsmanagement, Technologie und Werkzeugmaschinen|TU Darmstadt. http://www.prozesslernfabrik.de/
  11. 11.
    Gronau, N., Theuer, H., Lass, S., Nguyen, V.: Productivity evaluation of autonomous production objects. In: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics. Osaka, Japan, p. 751 July 2010Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rother, M., Shook, J.: Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate MUDA. Lean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erlach, K.: Value Stream Design: The way to a Lean Enterprise. Springer, Berlin (2007) (in German)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Business Information Systems and Electronic GovernmentUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations