IP Modularity in Software Ecosystems: How SugarCRM’s IP and Business Model Shape Its Product Architecture
We provide a case study of the concept of “IP modularity,” analyzing the case of SugarCRM. The modular architecture of this platform software is aligned with its intellectual property structure in such a way that the firm can derive, from the same code tree, an open source community version and a proprietary version. The software’s IP modular structure also facilitates the development of complements by distributed and anonymous complementors and simplifies downstream customizations, thus enhancing the platform’s attractiveness. We find that SugarCRM implements IP modularity on three different levels of the architectural hierarchy, in some cases down to the source code level. Our study thus extends the concept of IP modularity to comprise the notion of hierarchy levels.
KeywordsIntellectual Property Modularity Platforms Software Ecosystems
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Henkel, J., Baldwin, C.Y.: Modularity for Value Appropriation - How to Draw the Boundaries of Intellectual Property. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper, No. 11-054 (2010), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1340445
- 2.Baldwin, C.Y., Henkel, J.: The Impact of Modularity on Intellectual Property and Value Appropriation. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper No. 12-040 (2011), http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1971203
- 4.Gawer, A., Cusumano, M.A.: Platform leadership. How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2002)Google Scholar
- 7.Baldwin, C.Y., Woodard, C.J.: The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View. In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, pp. 19–44. Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2009)Google Scholar
- 8.Cusumano, M.A.: Staying power. Six enduring principles for managing strategy and innovation in an uncertain world (lessons from Microsoft, Apple, Intel, Google, Toyota and more). Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
- 9.Eisenmann, T.R., Parker, G., van Alstyne, M.: Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? In: Gawer, A. (ed.) Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Cheltenham, U.K. and Northampton, pp. 131–162. Elgar, Mass (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Raymond, E.S.: The cathedral and the bazaar. Musings on Linux and Open Source by an accidental revolutionary, Rev. edn. O’Reilly, Beijing (2001)Google Scholar
- 16.Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532–550 (1989)Google Scholar
- 17.Band, W.: The Forrester WaveTM: CRM Suites For Midsized Organizations. In: Q2 2010, Cambridge, Mass (2010)Google Scholar
- 18.Dow Jones Company Report - SugarCRM Inc. (2011) Google Scholar