Comparison of Visual Business Modeling Techniques for Software Companies

  • Garm Lucassen
  • Sjaak Brinkkemper
  • Slinger Jansen
  • Eko Handoyo
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 114)

Abstract

Despite the widespread adoption of business modeling techniques in academic research and business, no research has been done into how efficient and effective business modeling techniques document and communicate business models. This paper compares three visual business modeling techniques with a visual approach and identifies the strong and weak points of each modeling technique, based on applying the techniques to three startups and interviews with industry experts. With this comparison, visual business modeling technique developers can improve their own techniques and software companies can determine which technique to apply in their specific case.

Keywords

Visual Business Modeling Techniques Software Business Models Software Business Analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Designing and Evaluating E-business Models. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16, 11–17 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Tucci, C.L.: Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present and Future of the Concept. Communications of the Association for Information Science 16, 1–25 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brinkkemper, S., Soest, I., Jansen, S.: Modeling of Product Software Businesses: Investigation into Industry Product and Channel Typologies. In: 16th International Conference on Information Systems Development, pp. 307–325. Springer, Boston (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Mey, N., de Ridder, P.: Board of Innovation, http://www.boardofinnovation.com
  5. 5.
    Chesbrough, H., Rosenbloom, R.S.: The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change 1, 529–555 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Allen, J.: The Entrepreneur’s Business Model: Toward a Unified Perspective. Journal of Business Research 58, 726–735 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson, M.W., Christensen, C.M., Kagermann, H.: Reinventing Your Business Model. Harvard Business Review 12, 50–59 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linder, J., Cantrell, S.: Changing Business Models: Surveying the Landscape. Accenture Institute for Strategic Change, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lagha, S.B., Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Modeling e-business with eBM. In: 5th International Conference on Management of Networked Enterprises (CIMRE), Mahdia, pp. 1–14 (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pateli, A.G., Giaglis, G.M.: A Framework For Understanding and Analysing e-Business Models. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 13, 302–314 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Osterwalder, A.: The Business Model Ontology - a proposition in a design science approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, HEC Lausanne (2004a)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Osterwalder, A.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research - Design and Methods. SAGE Publications, Newbury Park (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shafer, S.M., Smith, H.J., Linder, J.C.: The Power of Business Models. Business Horizons 48, 199–207 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Investigating the Use of the Business Model Concept through Interviews. In: 4th International Conference on Electronic Business, pp. 568–573. Academic Publishers/World Publishing Corporating, Beijing (2004b)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weill, P., Vitale, M.: Place to Space: Migrating to Ebusiness Models. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boucharas, V., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Formalizing software ecosystem modeling. In: 1st International Workshop on Open Component Ecosystems, pp. 41–50. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Penker, M., Eriksson, H.: Business Modeling With UML: Business Patterns at Work. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Garm Lucassen
    • 1
  • Sjaak Brinkkemper
    • 1
  • Slinger Jansen
    • 1
  • Eko Handoyo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Computing SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations